-
No, why do the created entries always fail to pass, there may be the following reasons
1.Propaganda suspicions.
2.Resources.
References must be added to the References column. Whether the reference is from an official**, or other authority**. The content of encyclopedia entries should be objective and true, and reference materials should be provided to support it.
Character entry references cannot come from forums, blogs, etc. with disclaimers; Reference materials for books, networks**, comics, products, software, and game entries should come from official ** or other non-sale**; Drugs and other health products need to provide the manufacturer or health department filing information as a reference.
3.Body content.
The content of the text must meet the inclusion standards, and those that do not meet the inclusion standards will not be approved.
Do not include content that is irrelevant or weakly relevant to the entry name, such as redundant, meaningless or non-compliant information (e.g., non-objective, accurate, and comprehensive information). Do not include ambiguous content, such as maybe, maybe, probably, etc.
Entries must be written in the same way as an encyclopedia entry, and subjective content must not be added to the entry, or news reports must be reproduced.
4.Advertising content.
Encyclopedia does not allow any form of advertising. Promotional posts about individuals, companies, or products, or content that contains promotional or promotional content will be removed.
-
Encyclopedia entries are available to everyone, the creation and modification of entries are free, and there is no official and ** paid compilation by the company, please do not be deceived. The encyclopedia does not have any so-called "** business", and it does not have an external sales role. At the same time, Encyclopedia is also cracking down on criminals pretending to be official charges, if there are relevant clues, please report here.
In addition, if there is a submitted content system that does not pass, in order to ensure that the problem can be solved quickly, you can directly go to the online customer service for consultation and input: manual customer service), or you can provide the corresponding information to the complaint center for feedback in the failed area, and the staff will give detailed suggestions for modification according to the specific version.
-
No! When creating an encyclopedia, you don't have to use your real name, just like those celebrity encyclopedias, which of them uses their real name? Therefore, when creating an encyclopedia, it is more important to comply with the rules of copywriting, and at the same time have relevant materials to support it.
If you don't want to use your real name to do it, you can also use a stage name, but there is a premise that it must be supported by news materials, otherwise you can't create it.
About the creation of the encyclopedia,Jin Suitui has also shared some methods and skills in many articles,In fact, the core point is just a few,Consistent copywriting,Available testimony materials are enough,The rest is basically incidental,For the **aspect,Generally, you can upload it normally with your own.,But it's recommended to take some artistic photos.,Don't do those bells and whistles**Upload it.。
For the character encyclopedia, some characters still choose to use their real names to create encyclopedias, and a small number use their online stage names to make encyclopedias. Here Jin Suitui tells you one thing, whether it is a real name or a stage name as an encyclopedia, as long as you have available news supporting materials, both of these can create a successful encyclopedia.
The above is the relevant summary of Jin Suitui's encyclopedia must use his real name, if you still don't understand the relevant knowledge of the encyclopedia, you can find Jin Suitui here to ask you for the answer.
-
Thanks to Yunru Ke on behalf of the encyclopedia technical consultant teacher, give me feedback on the progress every day, the boss looks at the rest assured I am also comfortable, although halfway because of some official rules, resulting in some content needs to be slightly changed, Yun Ruke on behalf of the encyclopedia is also very patient to tell us the rules and principles, and finally the effect after the improvement of the line is still very good, and then cooperate when adding content in the future
-
Actually, there is no rule to this.,It's just that in general, I find that the created entries are more difficult to pass than the modified entries.、My entry is,A total of 8 entries.,After five.,But all five are modified entries.。 The remaining two are self-created entries. Because there is no standard comparison of the entries created by MS itself, it feels like the content is empty or there is too little information.
However, the modified entries are different, the first has a large flow, the second has a version comparison, and the third has a very short interval between modifications, and the changes are large. So even the slightest change can be easily compared. And then as long as there is a change that matches the current situation, it will let you pass.
Another point is the question of time, did you choose a time that is not the normal time? Is it late at night or at noon? In this case, this time period is an abnormal review time.
In other words, the wrong time period is also one of the reasons why your review fails.
Of course, there is also a problem of your own character, to see if you can catch up with a very casual administrator.
In addition, I would like to conclude with a sentence: as long as you firmly believe that the entries you make are done seriously and with your own painstaking efforts, no matter what the result is, this process is the most important. Gold will always shine, and as long as you put in the effort, you will definitely reap the abundant fruits with the sweat of hard work.
Complete! I hope mine can help you!
The creation of ordinary entries is generally free, and if you can't pass the review, it's not a problem with the reference material, it's a problem with the content. You check again, Sina such ** news can be used, and the content selected should be removed from subjective sentences and described in the third person. If you don't know the layout format, you can find a few entries created by others in the same kind for reference. >>>More
In fact, there are two aspects involved in this, one is the encyclopedia level itself, and the other is the skill of making entries. Generally speaking, the higher the level, the more things can be modified, and the higher the pass rate. As for skills, in fact, everything has to be skillful, and you can't mess around. >>>More
Mine too, the company's encyclopedia wanted to improve the information, so I wrote the company's profile, business scope and advantages, revised it many times but failed, deleted some content, changed the wording, and added references, internal links or something, but it just failed to pass, and new problems will appear every time. I guess even the slightest propaganda content can't be passed. The same is true for the library, and even the content of the propaganda nature cannot be passed.
There must be a reason why you didn't pass the creation, you can log in to your encyclopedia, and then, click on the failed version, and click on the view later. There will be reasons why you didn't pass it. If your encyclopedia is of a commercial nature, since June After the system upgrade, the commercial nature, people and medical encyclopedias, now the review is quite strict, for the creation of encyclopedias, I summarized the specific steps and some tips to share with you. >>>More
For beginners in encyclopedias, many places are still relatively difficult. Especially for the creation of entries for some business items, it is more difficult for newbies to succeed. There are a lot of rules in there that need to be learned slowly. >>>More