Why did the encyclopedia entries I created not pass the review?

Why do the entries I create always fail?

1.Propaganda suspicions.

2.Resources.

References must be added to the References column. Whether the reference is from an official**, or other authority**. The content of encyclopedia entries should be objective and true, and reference materials should be provided to support it.

Character entry references cannot come from forums, blogs, etc. with disclaimers; Reference materials for books, networks**, comics, products, software, and game entries should come from official ** or other non-sale**; Drugs and other health products need to provide the manufacturer or health department filing information as a reference.

3.Body content.

The content of the text must meet the inclusion standards, and those that do not meet the inclusion standards will not be approved.

Do not include content that is irrelevant or weakly relevant to the entry name, such as redundant, meaningless or non-compliant information (e.g., non-objective, accurate, and comprehensive information). Do not include ambiguous content, such as maybe, maybe, probably, etc.

Entries must be written in the same way as an encyclopedia entry, and subjective content must not be added to the entry, or news reports must be reproduced.

4.Advertising content.

Encyclopedia does not allow any form of advertising. Promotional posts about individuals, companies, or products, or content that contains promotional or promotional content will be removed.

If you create an entry that doesn't pass the review, there are a few possibilities:

The first possibility is that the created entry [does not meet the inclusion criteria of the encyclopedia], and the encyclopedia is not included, in this case, [no matter how well it is written, it is impossible to pass]. Specifically, if a [third party's] [publicly published] ** makes a [definitive introduction] to this content, and this ** is written as a "reference" in the entry, this content can be included as an entry. Otherwise, it doesn't meet the criteria for encyclopedia.

There are no references", "references are unreliable", etc., all fall into this category.

The second possibility is that the created entry name is not standardized. For example, if a person's name is "Zhang San", then the entry name should be "Zhang San", not "Singer Zhang San", "Professor Zhang San", etc.; The company name is ABC clothing ****, then the entry name should be "ABC clothing ****", not "ABC" or "ABC clothing", and so on. See here for details.

The third possibility is that the term created [insufficient valid information] does not clearly state the topic described by the entry. For example, when writing an entry for a TV series, you only write a synopsis, but you don't have the filming time, director, actors, information, etc. of the TV series; Write a company's entry, only write the company's products, but do not have the company's main business, company history, important events, etc. See here for details.

Originally, the product brand encyclopedia was made in November, but the boss was too busy with other projects, and it was determined in December and then placed an order, and the docking was done by Mr. Liu, who was the encyclopedia on behalf of Yunruke. At present, it has been completed, to give Yunru Kedai an encyclopedia a good praise.