Is it true that any political party has a class basis and a class character?

Right! Political parties have had a class character since their founding. The Communist Party is not saying that it represents the proletariat.

Classes have existed since the emergence of the state.

If classes no longer exist, it is what the Communists describe as communism. At that time, there was no state, no political party, and no class. But how many years it will take, whether it will be a thousand years or ten thousand years, no one knows.

In the national politics we studied in high school, it was said that "a political party is a political organization of classes, and it has a distinct class character." ”

By extension, yours is not wrong with that statement.

Upstairs, from the point of view of political science, any political party serves its own interests in the first place, and only the Communist Party serves the whole people, because the Communist Party represents all the proletariat. There are also communist parties abroad, which also serve the whole people; It's just that some of them are political parties that are supported by certain interest groups, and they serve interest groups in the first place.

I don't think I can say that.

Political parties in foreign countries basically serve the people of the whole country.

Their task is precisely to balance the interests of the various classes.

Upstairs, yes"That's nice", since you insist on dividing it by class.

Then I ask you which stratum of interests the Kuomintang in Taiwan represents.

Which class of the Democratic Party does it represent?

One more thing, I'm sure you're not in the world yet.

At present, you are still very convinced that what you learn from books is the truth.

I was shocked when I saw it, and then I looked at the time, so it was.

My lord, times have changed.

Answer]: False. (1) All political parties are political organizations of classes, and they all represent the interests of certain classes, strata and social groups in a concentrated manner, and class nature is the essential attribute of a political party.

2) In modern times, countries are generally led by political parties. The nature of a country is usually consistent with the class nature of the ruling party, but it is not the same as the class nature of all political parties. (3) In many countries, there are other political parties besides the ruling party, and not all political parties can become the ruling party.

4) It is unscientific to confuse "political parties" with "political parties" and to think that the nature of the state is consistent with the class nature of all political parties.

First of all, to correct the mistake of the landlord's formulation, China has not eliminated the class, at that time the formulation was "the exploiting class has been eliminated, and the exploiting class as a class no longer exists", and then said that "the class struggle is no longer the main contradiction in our country".

Class refers to the different social groups divided by people in a certain social production system because of their different positions, different relations of possession of the means of production, different roles in the organization of social labor, and different ways and amounts of social wealth. Its essence is due to their different positions in a certain socio-economic structure, where one group is able to appropriate the labor of the other. Class is an economic category, and the division of society into classes indicates the different positions of people in socio-economic relations.

Class is also a historical category, and its existence is only linked to a certain historical stage in the development of production. In every class society, there are two fundamentally antagonistic classes. Different class positions determine people's different political stances and mental outlooks.

Class contradictions and antagonisms will inevitably lead to fierce class struggle and social revolution.

To put it simply, in modern social theory, class is a social group. The working class has an image in people's minds when they hear their names, and although not every worker looks the same, the social image of this group is something they have in common. The middle class is the same, hehe, the "petty bourgeoisie" used to be said is outdated, maybe you think that you have a car, have a golf card and a gym card, and so on.

In China, scholars are now more likely to use the concept of "class" instead of "class", largely for historical reasons, in order to distinguish it from the political practice of "classification and composition".

Class: In a certain social production system, people are divided into different social groups because of their different positions, different relations with the means of production, and different roles in the organization of social labor, so they can receive their share of social wealth at their disposal in different ways and amounts.

Political party: A political organization that represents the interests of a certain class, stratum or social group in modern society and carries out extensive political activities in social life and state organs.

The difference between the essence of class and political party: 1. Any political party is a political organization of a class, and it represents the interests of a certain class, stratum or social group in a concentrated manner, and class nature is the essential attribute of a political party; 2. A political party is a class organization and a product of class struggle, but a political party is not a political phenomenon that arises at the same time as class and class struggle, it is a product of modern capitalist economic and political relations; 3. The basic characteristics of political parties are: political parties have a distinct class character, class nature is the essential attribute of a political party, which is embodied in the political program of the political party and the actual activities to realize class interests, and the class nature of the political party is also concentrated in the fact that the political party is composed of the backbone elements of the class.

In terms of the essence of class, it is an economic category. Lenin pointed out that the fundamental mark of distinguishing a class is its relationship with the means of production, whether it owns the means of production, and whether it owns the labor of other groups.

In essence, a class is a social group or a community of people whose interests are fundamentally opposed based on the different relations of ownership of the means of production.

Class is also a historical category. The existence of classes is only linked to a certain historical stage in the development of production.

In the early stage of primitive society, because there was no surplus product, there was no possibility of one large group appropriating the labor of another, so there was no class, and the formation of classes was the result of a certain degree of development of the productive forces and relative underdevelopment. ”