How strong is the shark swimsuit banned by the swimming federation?

The shark is the hegemon in the ocean, not only because of its aggressiveness, but also because of its speed.

This swimsuit relieves the user too much stress, so it helps too much when swimming.

I think the shark swimsuit might be in. There is a big increase in swimming speed, which is why it is banned.

It's very powerful, and when swimming, it will reduce a lot of resistance, and you can travel quickly.

I think it's probably going to be unfair to other players, so I'm going to be banned.

Because there are some human mechanics that may have a helping effect!

I felt that he could greatly increase the swimming speed of athletes, which is why he was banned.

I think this should have a certain auxiliary effect, so it will be canceled.

I think it's mainly because his design is so advanced, so it's hard to be fair.

This thing can reduce a lot of resistance from people, so it's very powerful.

Because it undermines the fairness of the competition, the swimming competition is originally a competition between athletes, and the competition is the ability of the athletes. But the advent of sharkskin swimsuits changed everything, because sharkskin swimsuits can greatly improve swimming performance by reducing resistance when swimming, and the difference between athletes who wear sharkskin swimsuits and those who don't wear sharkskin swimsuits is very large, which makes the competition very unfair. And the sharkskin swimsuit is also being upgraded, so this unfairness is getting worse and worse, and the swimming competition becomes a sharkskin swimsuit competition.

It makes the competition lose its original meaning, and it also makes the athletes lose the motivation to work hard. As a result, FINA finally decided to ban the use of high-tech swimsuits in swimming competitions after 2010.

Sharkskin swimsuits were first allowed to compete in 1999, but experimentally, but at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, sharkskin shone and Australian swimmer Thorpe won three gold medals in a sharkskin swimsuit. And it broke three world records. And at that Olympics, 13 of the 14 world records set in swimming were set by wearing sharkskin swimsuits.

Since then, sharkskin swimsuits have become popular and have continued to grow, and it is Phelps of the United States who has benefited the most, and it is no exaggeration to say that without the support of sharkskin swimsuits, Phelps would never have won so many gold medals. Phelps' pinnacle was the development of sharkskin.

And after the sharkskin swimsuit was banned, Phelps's light was gone, which says a lot. Sharkskin swimsuits are a dark history in the world of swimming, and their appearance has made swimsuits the protagonists of competitions, not athletes, and he has made athletes' hard work in vain. This is very unsportsmanlike, and it is a matter of time before it is banned, and it is also a bit unbelievable that it was banned only after more than 10 years.

Because sharkskin swimsuits reduce drag by 3%. The race is a race against the clock, and this 3% reduction is likely to play a key role in swimming competitions. The swimsuit was banned by FINA in 2010 for use in swimming competitions.

Because this clothing affects the fairness and impartiality of the competition, and the resistance of wearing such clothing will be reduced, it is unfair to other athletes.

I know the reason, which will make other people very scared, and it is also a prank, so I will be banned.

I know, because shark skin reduces drag when swimming, allowing athletes to swim quickly, and there is a suspicion of cheating.

A shark swimsuit can greatly improve an athlete's performance, directing the surrounding current, reducing water resistance and increasing swimming speed by 3%.

In 1999, FINA officially allowed athletes to wear shark swimsuits to compete. At the 2000 Sydney Olympics, Australian swimmer Ian Thorpe wore the first shark swimsuit to compete, and Thorpe broke three world records and won all three gold medals.

The most exaggerated was his 400m freestyle final, when Thorpe, wearing a shark swimsuit, swam to the finish line and turned to find that none of the competitors were within a metre of him, and even the second place was only visible on the live TV camera, and the rest of the competitors had not even entered the live camera.

The core technology of the shark swimsuit

The core technology of the shark swimsuit is to imitate the shark's **. Biologists have found that the rough V-shaped folds on the surface of sharks** can greatly reduce the friction of the current, allowing the current around the body to flow more efficiently, allowing the shark to swim quickly. The fast-skinned, ultra-stretched fiber surface is made to completely mimic the surface of a shark**.

In addition, the swimsuit incorporates biomimetic principles to mimic human tendons at the seams to provide power for athletes to stroke backwards. It imitates human ** on the cloth and is elastic.

Because this is a high-tech product, the appearance of such a product will affect the fairness of the game, so it is natural to need a ban.

Because it's unfair to do so, people who wear sharkskin swimsuits will have less resistance and will have more advantages, so they will be banned.

It's very unfair to wear a swimsuit like this, because it reduces drag in the water, so you're banned.

Because shark skin swimsuits are high-tech products, they imitate human beings in fabric, are elastic, and can reduce resistance in the water when swimming, which violates the essence of swimming competitions without the help of external forces, and shark skin swimsuits are more expensive than ordinary swimsuits, and not all athletes can afford to wear them, thus causing unfairness.

Shark skin swimsuit, also known as magic swimsuit, is a high-tech swimsuit made by simulating sharks**.

Because sharkskin swimsuits have been subject to a lot of criticism and controversy since they were allowed in 2000, FINA banned high-tech swimsuits globally in 2010.

FINA rules prohibit the use of high-tech swimsuits during swimming, which must be made of textile and must not cover the limbs.

Many experts believe that this kind of swimsuit violates the essence of sports competitions without the help of external forces and is not in line with the Olympic spirit. Therefore, in 2009, FINA decided to ban the use of this particular swimsuit.

Sharks swim extremely fast in the water, reaching speeds of up to nearly 60 kilometers per hour. The skin of the shark we see on TV seems to be very smooth, but in fact it is not, the real shark skin is very rough, and the surface is covered with a lot of tiny scales, these small scales are like small deflectors, so that the water can flow through the body faster, which can significantly reduce the friction resistance of the water.

This allows the sharks to swim faster during the hunt. Inspired by this, scientists also used this structure when making swimsuits, and experiments have shown that wearing shark skin, swimmers can reduce their resistance in the water by 3%.

Olympic spirit

Everyone should have the possibility to play sport, free from any form of discrimination, and embody the spirit of mutual understanding, friendship, solidarity and fair play, which was the original vision of humanity to carry out the Olympic Games. With the advancement of science and technology, various black technologies in the Olympic Games have also begun to appear on the stage, and it is understandable to have the blessing of science and technology in the process of competition.

However, there were some black technologies in the Olympics that gradually undermined the fairness of the Olympic Games, and the sharkskin swimsuit was such an existence until it was directly banned by FINA.

Introduction: In fact, the equipment worn by athletes is usually not simple, good equipment can improve athletes' performance, but bad equipment will seriously reduce athletes' performance. Swimsuits worn by swimmers are also particularly noteworthy, there are some athletes who have performed well after wearing sharkskin swimsuits, but I didn't expect this sharkskin swimsuit to be banned, why?

In fact, this is equivalent to a competition between people and people, a physique and skill of the athletes, but in the end it becomes a competition of technology. If you use technology to train the athletes, make the training methods of the athletes more scientific, and quickly improve the physical level of the athletes. But if you swim in a shark skin swimsuit, in the words of an athlete, it is equivalent to putting a scuba on the athlete to participate in swimming, which is actually a cheating.

The athlete who wore sharkskin must have a more obvious advantage than other people who did not wear it, which has seriously undermined the fairness of the game.

Swimming competitions are actually more than the physical fitness of the athlete and the swimming skillsThis requires athletes to train hard day after day, not to say that wearing a swimsuit can be better than others. And athletes work so hard every day, and every country treats athletes differently. If these high-tech products are allowed to appear, then it means that the better the treatment and the stronger the country's economic strength, the better the performance of the athletes, which is not a mess.

The proper use of technology is very good, for example, in sprint competitions, Su Bingtian is a highly educated person, and can use research to analyze the level of competition and change his training style. It's all well and good to use technology appropriately, but you can't use it to cheat in a competition like the Olympics.

Mainly because this swimsuit allows athletes to improve their athletic performance, it has some unique features. So you will be banned.

Because this dress is very good for swimming, it can reduce resistance, and it destroys the fairness of the game, so he was banned.

Because such clothes are equipped with high-tech applications, and then with the help of external forces, it is easy to be unfair or illegal.