Who has a more comprehensive information on the C outlook and outlook?

c The prospects are okay. C, the demand in my city is also not small, Winform, WebForm have, the web aspect is the majority, and the game aspect is not understood.

As for speaking of cnet, at present, it seems that if you want to go to an Internet company, the scope of understanding these options will be much narrower, and traditional companies will be of great use. The future development depends on Microsoft's promotion and execution in this regard.

I feel that the development prospects are still good.

As long as you learn any language, you have a future for development.

It's good that all of them under win7 are in C.

c It doesn't matter if the outlook is good or not.

The line is the champion.

You like to develop, you like to write**.

Ask yourself.

Compared with C and C++, C has a tendency to replace it in application system programming;

Whether it is a novice learning programming or a variety of software engineering development, C has the advantages of being quick to get started, easy to learn and easy to handle.

Its disadvantage compared with C lies in the grasp of the underlying layer, so the system it develops or the program it develops is inferior to C in terms of operational efficiency, but in today's hardware development, it is not necessary to speed up through software, unless it is a program that develops a large number of applications.

XNA can be used for PC and Xbox game programming.

1. Please believe that no one can predict the future. Microsoft is withered. NET can only run on Windows at the moment.

2. Based on. .NET's C is a good tool for writing the current three-tier dry architecture, which is easier to get started and more "money-making".

3. Based on. .NET C When writing a stand-alone version of a WIN application, the running of the written program depends. .NET dynamic library call, therefore, the efficiency is lower than that of the real machine code program, and it can still be used when the efficiency requirements are not high.

4. There is no new technology and new thinking in the future. What's more, how far into the future is the future, 5 years, 10 years, or 100 years? I bet that in 100 years, we won't be using Microsoft's Windows.

5. Finally, I would like to say that the learning of programming has always been a one-size-fits-all approach, and changing a language is just a change of grammar and a change of tools. The core idea and understanding of computer technology remain the same. At the very least, you have to believe that the IQ of your mind is constant.