-
To put it simply, a white horse is not a horse, Gongsun Long: a famous family among the hundreds of sons, he has always been known for his sophistry.
In the middle of the Warring States period in China, Gongsun Long of Zhao put forward the sophistry proposition "white horses are not horses" in "On White Horses". Gongsun Long believes that things and concepts are different, so there is absolutely no connection between concepts and concepts. In his opinion, the two concepts of "white horse" and "horse" are different, so there is no connection between them, which leads to the inference:
"White horse" is not "horse". He believes that the concept of "white horse" is both "color" and "shape", and the concept of "horse" is only the name "shape", so "white horse is not a horse". In order to prove the proposition that "white horses are not horses", Gongsun Long put forward another argument:
Ask for horses, yellow and black horses can be caused; Ask for a white horse, and a yellow and black horse cannot be done. Such a statement is, of course, ridiculous.
-
It is a topic of debate, which roughly means: A asks B: Is a white horse a horse?
B said yes, so there was a white horse = horse, and then A asked B: What about a horse = a white horse? B must say no, because horses have many colors, and then A comes to the conclusion that horses ≠ white horses, and this comparison with the previous one leads to a paradox:
White horses are not horses. In ancient times, this subject was debated, but no one could argue with you...
-
White horses are not horses, this is a famous logical problem put forward by the great ancient Chinese logician Gongsun Long (c. 320-250 BC), from "Gongsun Longzi White Horse Treatise".
-
This is a point in philosophy.
-
The meaning of white horse is not horse: white horse refers to a white horse, and its connotation is an animal plus color, while the connotation of horse is just an animal, and the connotation of the two is different, so the two cannot be equated, so the white horse is not a horse.
The connotation of the theory of white horses and non-horsesThe classical discourse of the white horse and the non-horse distinguishes the three concepts of horse, white horse and white, and replaces the inequality in the real sense with the inequality between the connotations, so as to realize its discourse through semantic fallacy.
In Huiyin Gongsun Long's view, if you want to get a "horse", then both the yellow horse and the black horse are horses, and if you want to get a white horse, then neither the black horse nor the white horse can meet the requirements. If you have to say that the white horse is a horse, then if you want to get the "former hall horse", you can only be a white horse, so why do you get a different macro answer with the exact same requirements as before? Gongsun Long goes on to discuss this, which shows that the requirements for getting a horse are completely different from the requirements for getting a white horse, so as mentioned earlier, a white horse is different from a horse, so a white horse is not the same as a horse.
-
White horse is not a horse means a logical question raised by the Chinese logician Gongsun Long.
Original text: "A white horse is not a horse, but what? He said, "Yes." He said, "What? Said Liang Husun: "The horse, so the shape of the life is also." The white one, so the color of life also. Those who are destined for color are not destined for shape, so they are called white horses and not horses. ”
Translation: Isn't it true that the guest side said that it can be expressed as a white horse is not equal to a horse? Gongsun Long:
OK. Guest: Why?
Gongsun Long: "Horse" is a regulation on the "shape" of things, while "white horse" is a regulation on the "color" of horses, and the definition of the "color" aspect is naturally different from the definition of the "shape" aspect of the chain. Therefore, as a result of different definitions of different concepts, white horses and horses are also different.
Gongsun Long (320 years ago, 250 years ago), the legend Zibing, the Chinese Warring States period Zhao people, once did the plain Jun's doorman, the representative of the hundred famous families, its main work is "Gongsun Longzi", a total of 14 Gongsun Long in the Western Han Dynasty, divided into three volumes in the Tang Dynasty, lost 8 in the Northern Song Dynasty, only 6 articles remain, a total of one volume.
Philosophical Explanations of White Horses Not Horses
Philosophy pursues the truth of things, and in the face of the discourse of "white horses are not horses", we must first understand its original meaning, otherwise we will fall into the logical fallacy of covering our ears and stealing bells. Here the "white horse" is the white horse, an animal with specific attributes. "Horse" is the animal of horses, which is a general term for a group of organisms limited to the level of "species".
The key to understanding this discourse lies in understanding its logical conjunction "non", where "non" means "not", and the meaning of "is" is multiple, including "belongs", "equal", etc., and there is a logical relationship between "contains" and "equivalent to". The concept of "Qingchang White Horse" belongs to "horse", but it is not equivalent to "horse".
From a philosophical point of view, it is a kind of idealistic thought, detached from the ideological principles of materialism, detached from reality, opportunistic, and a typical substitute for subjective idealism, which is the outstanding work of the founder of the sophists in the Warring States period of our country.
According to the Hubei vernacular, there are seven birds on the board, and they chew crookedly.