Is there a lawyer to ask about the property dispute case 5

Property disputes are not necessarily.

Get a lawyer. You can also negotiate a solution yourself.

1. The testator does not need to notify his children when making a will.

2. This will has been notarized, as long as your grandmother's mind is clear and normal when she makes the will, then the will is valid.

As long as it is a true expression of the grandmother, the will is valid, and then consult the real estate and legal department.

1.Your grandmother has the right to dispose of her property, and she does not need to notify her other children when she makes a will for her property;

2.A notarized will has strong legal force and will generally not be overturned.

1. The house is the joint property of your mother and your stepfather, and your stepfather cannot sell the house alone. When a real estate transaction is made, both husband and wife must sign at the same time to sell the house.

2. Your mother and your stepfather are not divorced, so there is no need to file a lawsuit, because 50% of the house belongs to your mother. In the case of divorce, it involves the division of the joint property of the husband and wife, and only if the negotiation is unsuccessful, the lawsuit will be filed.

3. You are already an adult, your stepfather and you have a dependency relationship, in the future, if he needs your support, you have the obligation to support him, as long as you treat him better, I believe he will not sell the house.

Generally, it can only be required to divide according to the joint property of the husband and wife, and the oral promise has no probative force unless the other party admits it himself.

The house belongs to the joint property of your parents (stepfather), and how to dispose of it should be agreed upon by the husband and wife. Even if it is sold, the proceeds are the joint property of the husband and wife. It is more difficult to prove verbally, and the ownership of the house is subject to the registration of ownership.

The situation you mentioned belongs to the inheritance issue: the house belongs to the joint property of your grandmother and grandfather, and the dao should be divided first.

Half to your grandmother; The other half of the house belongs to your grandfather's estate, and in the absence of a will, it is divided according to the following circumstances: your grandmother and your grandfather's children are divided equally, and the children who have more maintenance obligations can be appropriately divided. In the case of a will, the property is divided according to the will.

If you really say that, you can apply to the court to confirm that the will is invalid, but you must have definite evidence to prove it, otherwise the court will not support it.

Your narrative is a little unclear: did your own grandfather die 20 years ago, your grandmother remarried, and now you are fighting for your step-grandfather's real estate?

Guangdong lawyer:

1. The house belongs to the joint property of the two elders, and the income of your grandfather and your grandmother after marriage, including the pension version or other rights, is also joint property, and your grandmother enjoys half of the property rights of the house and half of the share of other property.

2. According to the legal inheritance, your grandmother and your grandparents' children (including children born out of wedlock) shall have the right to inherit half of the house and half of the other common property belonging to your grandfather.

3. According to the Inheritance Law, the heirs who bear more support obligations to the decedent during their lifetime (in this case, the maintenance obligation) may share more of the inheritance, and the heirs who bear less or no support obligations may share less or no inheritance.

The premise depends on what kind of agreement you have signed with the developer and how the agreement is agreed.

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Disputes over Commercial Housing Sales Contracts.

Article 14 Where the floor area or floor area of the house unit delivered by the seller is inconsistent with the area agreed in the contract for the sale and purchase of commercial housing, and there is an agreement in the contract, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement; If there is no agreement in the contract or the agreement is not clear, it shall be handled in accordance with the following principles:

1) If the absolute value of the area error ratio is within 3 (including 3), and the settlement is based on the facts in accordance with the provisions of the contract, and the buyer's request to terminate the contract shall not be supported;

2) If the area error exceeds 3 in absolute value, and the buyer's request to terminate the contract and return the purchase price and interest paid shall be supported. If the buyer agrees to continue to perform the contract, and if the actual area of the house is greater than the area agreed in the contract, the buyer shall make up the price of the house price within 3 (including 3) of the area error ratio in accordance with the agreement, and the seller shall bear the price of the house price exceeding the 3 part of the area error ratio, and the ownership shall belong to the buyer; If the actual area of the house is less than the area agreed in the contract, the seller shall return to the buyer the price and interest for the part of the area error ratio within 3 (including 3), and the seller shall return double the price of the house price for the area error ratio exceeding 3 parts.

Whether you have signed a pre-sale agreement and other relevant documents with the real estate developer before the formal contract, if there is a real estate developer, you may be liable for the negligence of the contract; If you don't have the developer's current behavior, you will hardly get relief.

Tips: If you have already signed a sales contract with the real estate developer, if you encounter this situation during the delivery process, you should only pay more than 3% of the agreed area, that is, only 40x3% of the square meter should be paid, and the real estate developer should bear the rest.

1.The house was bought during the existence of the marital relationship, and in principle, your mother has a share in this house Your father's oral will can only dispose of his own share, and his mother's share he has no right to dispose of If there is no other right holder, only from the capital contribution, your mother's share is: (5500 2000) 2} 5500 100

2.Since your four siblings voluntarily signed the agreement and you made compensation, the agreement should be legal and valid, so no one other than your mother has the right to claim the right to the house Because your share of the property is greater than your mother, she has no right to sell the house without your consent But she claims her own share, and you have the right of first refusal

First of all, whether the old man's will has been notarized is necessary, and if it is indeed voluntary, it is necessary.

So, from the moment the old man dies, legally speaking, the house belongs to the third son, so whatever the third son does with the property in the future, it is his own property, and he has his freedom whether he gives it to the eldest son or sells it.

Therefore, as the second son, you have no right to sue the court.

To use an example, if I give you a hundred dollars, and if you give it to you, it's yours, and I don't care how you spend it.

The old man has already given your third brother the house is your third brother's then what your third brother does with this house is your third brother's own business, and he is willing to give your eldest brother a part of it is someone else's business, and you can't participate.