-
No. The right to personal liberty is commonly known as the "right to liberty". Strictly speaking, the concept of "right to liberty" cannot be established.
Rights are the qualifications of the subject of rights to realize their own will, that is, the freedom to realize their own will. The essence of rights is freedom. Every right is a freedom.
"The right to freedom" is the freedom of freedom, or the freedom to dominate freedom, which obviously does not make sense. The right to personal liberty is the right of the subject of rights to independently control his actions within the scope of the law, and it is the right to freedom of action, which should be called the right to action. Action is the material personal element of the subject, and the right to action is the material personality right.
Behavioral qualifications are material personality elements. The human body is the sum of the elements of each person, and is the object of all personal rights, not the object of the right to act. "Person" can be interpreted as a person's body in Chinese, but the person's body is the object of the right to body, not the object of the right to action.
Therefore, it is not accurate to refer to the right of the right holder to direct his or her own actions as the right to personal liberty, but it is widely used. Juridically speaking, the "right to act" can be divided into political and non-civil rights of action and civil rights of action. Traditional civil law divides the "right to liberty" into the right to freedom under public law and the right to freedom from private law, which is roughly equivalent.
The right to political action is a personality right in the political field, including the right to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, freedom of assembly, procession and demonstration, and freedom of religious belief, and is not a civil right. The right to act in civil law refers to the right to act in civil law.
-
It should be violated, because this is the teacher's private decision, not all schools stipulate this, you can complain to the teacher, but it's better not to do this, the teacher is very vindictive! But you're already cool, we wake up at 6:20 a.m. each!
-
Okay, we all wake up at about 6:30 and 6:45 in elementary school, and we have more classes in the morning than in the university (7 classes a day and 4 classes in the morning). So don't complain.
-
No, maybe it's for you, otherwise why would he be so boring?
-
I'm a post-00s, and I don't know if college is difficult or easy, but because I was exercised by my parents, in the third grade, I woke up naturally at half past six, and I didn't need an alarm clock...
-
In fact, for us, the starting point of the school at any time is good, but there are still many controversies about stipulating that students must get up at 7:30, whether it will cause a psychological burden on childrenIn other words, it takes time to test the pressure of studying, and for this practice of colleges and universities, it does deprive college students of their rights, so it may also increase the burden on college students, so we can consider the problem from the following aspects. <>
1. For us, colleges and universities stipulate that students must get up at 7:30, which is also for the consideration of students, so it is worth advocating. In fact, in some ways, school rules are made for the sake of students, so in some senses, the starting point of these regulations is good, and it stipulates that students 7:
30 It is necessary to get up, but also to allow students to develop good habits of behavior, to prevent time from being wasted, and to consider in the spirit of being responsible for students. <>
2. Whether the school's regulations are reasonable also needs to be considered over time, and it should be considered in combination with the physical and mental development of students at various times. In fact, we will find that the adult world is relatively complex, and because of this, college students have more personal lives while studying, so they need to make regulations, students must get up diligently, whether there is a need for implementation is also controversial, although the starting point is good, but in the actual implementation process, whether it will have a negative impact on students is also unknown, so it should be combined with the actual situation of students for reasonable planning. <>
3. At any time, the school stipulates that students must get up at 7:30, which is worth advocating, but from the perspective of human nature, it should be adjusted in combination with the actual situation of the students themselves. Among them, we will find that most of the time if you are too paranoid, it will also increase the learning burden and pressure of students, so it is necessary for us to give students relaxation appropriately from the perspective of human nature, and for adults, there is a need for personal leisure time at any time, so for this reason, the school should formulate a clear plan for adjustment in combination with the student's learning itself to avoid causing psychological harm to students.
In fact, it has to be said that colleges and universities stipulate that students must get up at 7:30, which is also worthy of praise and advocacy, but whether these regulations are human or need to be tested by students, and students should be given appropriate freedom at all times, so deliberate coercion is also irrational, so it should be adjusted in combination with the actual situation.
-
I think the school's rules are very reasonable, because many college students may go to bed late and get up late, which is not only very bad for their body, but also may be very chaotic in life, which is also very bad for their personal growth, so I think that getting up at 7:30 is not only helpful for their physical health, but also for them to be more self-disciplined.
-
Plausible. Because it is good to go to bed early and get up early, such a school rule is conducive to the physical and mental health of students, so the rule is reasonable.
-
I think the rules of the university are unreasonable, although it is good to get up early in the morning that "the bed is the grave of youth", but on the weekends students can relax their tired bodies by taking a lazy nap.
-
I think that the fact that colleges and universities require students to get up at half past seven is worthy of implementation and praise from a certain point of view. Through such mandatory regulations, it is conducive to helping students develop healthier living habits. <>
This rule is conducive to helping students quit laziness and become more positive. Many college students think that after the end of the heavy academic life in high school, they can finally relax in the university, but after all, there are not so many courses in the university, and the students' time is relatively free, therefore, many college students have become extremely lazy in their college life, go to bed late and get up late, do not want to make progress, do not like sports, and like to stay in the dormitory every day. <>
Such a lazy state of life is slowly ruining this kind of college student like boiling a frog in warm water. Because they don't have to get up early, many students like to stay up late and wake up every morning when the sun is shining, and this person's mental state is not very good.
This provision is beneficial to the physical and mental health of students. Many students wake up late in the morning because they stayed up late the night before, and as we all know, staying up late can be very harmful to the body. In addition, many students choose to skip breakfast because they wake up late, and skipping breakfast is not only very hurtful to the stomach, but also easy to lead to stones.
In addition, when students wake up early, they will have time to participate in morning exercises, run or walk, and participate in other physical exercises. Therefore, stipulating that students must get up at half past seven is actually for the sake of students' physical health. <>
This regulation is also conducive to helping students develop the good habit of being diligent and eager to study and improving their mental outlook. Students get up early, will have more energy to go to the library early to study, the so-called plan of the day lies in the morning, morning is the best time of the day to learn, make full use of the morning time to study than other time in the day to learn more efficiently. Therefore, stipulating that students must get up at 7:30 is to help students develop healthier living habits and thus harvest a more exciting university life.
-
I think this is very helpful for students to be more disciplined, and it can also cultivate students' awareness of strict self-discipline, and getting up at 7:30 in the morning may also be very helpful for the healthy growth of students, so that they will not go to bed too late at night and not be able to get up in the morning.
-
I think it's good that the school has this kind of rule, because college students are lazy in life, and if there are no classes in the morning, some college students don't sleep at night, and they will sleep until noon during the day and don't get up, so they waste their good years. I think it's a good rule that colleges and universities have to get up at 7:30, and I hope other colleges and universities will do the same in the future.
-
Jilin University of Foreign Chinese stipulates that freshmen and sophomores must leave bed at 7:10, and juniors and seniors must get up at 7:30, otherwise each person will be deducted two points.
This provision is made for colleges and universities. Many people are in favor of it, because some students start to relax mentally and physically after entering university. Often staying up late, not getting up in the morning, developing bad habits, causing harm to the body and also affecting schooling.
The school solves these problems, helps students develop good living habits, stipulates work and rest time to restrain students to study hard, and urges students not to waste their good years.
-
It was not early at half past seven, and we all got up at 5 o'clock when we went to school, and we had to walk for an hour on the mountain road. Not to mention that the body is great, now the child just lacks exercise and only knows how to play with mobile phones.
-
I think it's very good, so that students develop a good habit of going to bed early and waking up early, which is also good for physical health, and can also allow students to be self-disciplined, but if there are no classes on weekends, it is better to allow students to sleep a little later, so that students have time to relax.
-
I think that's a good thing. Nowadays, the situation of college students sleeping in the dormitory is very serious, and this measure can effectively prevent lazy sleep, which is very good for students' learning and school management.
-
This is beneficial for students to develop a good habit of waking up early. Getting students up early through hard measures is beneficial for some students with poor self-control, which is conducive to improving their self-discipline.
-
I think it's okay but it's not necessary, the school rules are not very humane, everyone has their own schedule, and the right of students to arrange their own time should be respected.
-
I don't think it's necessary because college students are already adults and have their own way of managing their time. The school should respect the daily routine of each student, and students should also have the right to arrange their own time.
-
I think this rule is also to let children develop a regular schedule, which is also a good thing, and half past seven is also a normal time to get up.
-
The school's approach is a good idea to make effective use of their study time, but the mandatory requirements will be off-putting to students, and if conditions allow, students can take more breaks.
-
Think this decision is worth promoting! Nowadays, some college students start to be lazy as soon as they enter college, and they are depressed all day long. Resting late, comforting myself the next day for various reasons not to get up. College students should be more energetic to improve themselves!
-
I think the original intention of the school is good, the purpose is to let students develop a good habit of going to bed early and waking up early, but it can't be one-size-fits-all.
-
The school is too strong for people to be difficult. Because students are under academic pressure, they should be given free time in the morning.
-
There is a news on the Internet that has attracted the attention of many netizens, that is, there is an efficiency, he stipulates that students must get up at 7:30, and some netizens ask whether this kind of rule is really good for students? What exactly do you think about this?
I think this rule may be well-intentioned, but it doesn't apply to many students. I don't think it's necessary to do this, it's not good for a lot of students.
I can understand why colleges and universities make such a decision, in fact, they want students to get up early and go to bed early, exercise, study earlier, don't spend too much time on meaningless things, for this reason, I think it is reasonable for schools to do this, but now in many cases this is not suitable. For example, many students don't stay up late to play, he may stay up late to learn it, you ask him to get up at 7:30, do you think he has energy for the whole day?
It is not spiritual, and now the student has his own ideas, his own schedule, and if you give him a set time to get up, it will disrupt his rhythm throughout the day. I think it's very inconvenient and bad for students because of this. So I actually understand this matter, but I don't agree with this matter, take me as an analogy, in fact, I am more in favor of going to bed early and getting up early, but sometimes I will stay up late due to the urgency of the situation, and in the case of staying up late, I will get up late on the second day, or I will not be in a good mental state on the second day.
Will choose to get a good night's sleep at noon. If someone sets me a daily time to go to bed and a time to wake up every day, I feel as if my life is tied up, and I can't arrange my own time? So I think this kind of regulation is very inconvenient and bad for students, although I can understand the intention of making this regulation, but I think the mind is used in the wrong place.
Rather than that, students who wake up at 7:30 every day can, for example, pick up things for free.
-
This rule is very correct, because getting up at half past seven is actually a normal work and rest time, which is in line with the scientific law of work and rest. Some schools will also require students to wake up at 6 o'clock in order to learn more, and this rule is already very humane.
Testimonials from outstanding students.
1. Be more tolerant and don't worry about classmates; Able to strictly abide by the rules and regulations, and actively participate in various sports activities; Have a clear learning goal, be able to concentrate on listening to lectures, consciously complete various exercises, and hope that in the future, pay attention to cultivating good learning methods, and communicate with teachers and classmates in case of trouble. Looking forward to the next semester to the next level. >>>More
It is illegal for a teacher to confiscate a student's mobile phone, and a school teacher is not a law enforcement agency and has no right to confiscate private property. Students have the right to demand restitution and restitution of property from individuals and authorities (other than law enforcement agencies) who have committed legal property. However, it is not illegal for teachers to confiscate mobile phones and hand them over directly to students' parents. >>>More
No. Education is the right of minors, and schools and teachers should provide assistance to students with poor grades and bad conduct, and must not discriminate, let alone arbitrarily impose disciplinary sanctions, or even order them to drop out of school or expel them from school. Schools shall persuade, educate, and assist students who have violated discipline; Where it is truly necessary to give sanctions, the school shall first explain the reasons to the minor students and their guardians, hear opinions, and make a sanction decision in accordance with the principles of fairness and justice. >>>More
The comments of the senior one class teacher on the students are as follows: >>>More
Find out why students don't complete their assignments and solve the problem. >>>More