1000 1500 digital cameras at the price point

This time last year, I was focusing on the Fujifilm J250

Optical image stabilization and five-fold optical zoom are available.

Not bad. But then I bought the F200 with a little more money

Personally, I recommend Fujifilm's cameras.

Cost-effective.

If you can, buy the F-series.

It is a series with better professional performance in Fujifilm cards.

Now I don't know what the F60 is**.

It is estimated that it will not be much more expensive.

That's a good machine, too.

I think the cost performance of Fujifilm cameras is still good.

And there is. It is not recommended to buy Samsung.

It's only been a few years since I entered the camera field.

Most of the sales are gimmicks.

Olympus.

Haven't used it. I don't know.

F200 and F85 are recommended

Look at the camera.

Generally, it will be more careful.

Optical zoom (the bigger the better, you can also look at digital zoom later, but the latter is not very meaningful), whether there is a manual function (you may not feel anything at the beginning, but the more you come later, the more you will feel that having manual is better than not having manual, and at this price you can do it completely), pixels (in fact, it's not that important, and now it's basically more than 10 million, which can be ignored), wide angle (28mm is best 24mm, anyway, it's basically bigger the better), Lenses (lenses from several more well-known manufacturers will image better).

What other screens, batteries, appearances, and special functions, let's see for yourself.

Recommend Sony's WX5

Sony WX5 has the strongest technology in the small DC at this stage, Sony WX5 ** (WX1 upgrade is more compact and portable ** will improve some of the performance of the old model) in the original WX1 based effective pixels increased to 12.2 million, the size of the sensor increased to 1 inch and the cost performance is also very high. In terms of function, the camera has many unique features such as handheld night scenes, rear projection sensors, etc. And in terms of ease of use, the WX5 also inherits the consistent advantages of the Sony WX1.

Therefore, if you are a consumer who has certain requirements for camera functions and image quality, and does not want to add too much travel burden to taking photos, Jumei's photography equipment network believes that Sony WX5 is a good choice.

Finally, Jumei.com wishes you success in your work and study, and you can buy your favorite camera and produce more good films!

Choosing Canon is not a wise choice, Fujifilm S4050, this one I guarantee you will love with 14 million effective pixels, 30x optical zoom, whether it is macro or telephoto, it is very good.

The price point may be a little higher than you expect, but the performance and appearance of this one will give you a long face, if it is within 1500, I will also recommend the ixus series to you.

See how many times you want a wide angle, I used a nikon is not bad, the model is coolpix s3000, I bought it during the winter vacation, I bought it for about 1200, and now it is estimated that it has dropped a lot. Sony's several W series are also good.

Sony's W570 is good Canon's ixus115

Canon A2000 (1000W pixels).

The same is 1cm macro.

**Around 1400.

Both have optical image stabilization (which is very useful).

I've sent you a short message, so let's take a look.

Recommended for the landlord Samsung PL150 dual screen 5X 1400Pixels **Only 1300