Is it wise or stupid to sacrifice oneself like this?

Well, in fact, what the Buddha wanted to express was the meaning and importance of "compassion".

Exhort people to have good thoughts, just as if you see someone fainting, you will immediately call a white cart.

These sacrifices are not something that can be said to be wise and stupid.

The act of self-sacrifice is to teach people not only to care about their own existence, but also to help others when they need it.

It's a good thing that you have come across Buddhism's claim that all beings are equal.

Since they are all treated equally. Why bother to separate between you being an animal and me being a man?

Hehe, sometimes religion is not who is right and who is wrong. In fact, in this world, the role of religion is often chosen by people because of the needs of the "market".

Truth is important, but what people value is market demand.

You ask as if someone else asks you that God can't be many? Speaking of which, in the end. No one serves anyone.

Look at the "market demand" to do things

Some people insist on one side, some people insist on equality, and some people shake their hands and hope for godlessness.

Truth? Unless the person confesses and believes, the truth is as worthless as a blank slate.

Adam's choice is people's choice, so why don't you want to think about why Adam chose to eat the forbidden fruit?

It can only be said that there is no solution.

Hey, I digress.

Conclusion: The Buddha is not stupid, because the Buddha embodies not only the equality of all beings, but also teaches people to love.

God rains down and exterminates living beings, is it fraternity or cruelty?!

A man's rib is one less than a woman's, is it truth or nonsense?! Can you explain the true meaning of this?

Taking words out of context is distorting other people's doctrines, and it even plugs up one's own ears and blinds, and can only make oneself farther and farther away from the truth and the teachings of God and Jesus.

This is just a Buddhist example where if the Buddha didn't protect the rabbit, the rabbit would die, and if he protected the rabbit, the eagle would starve to death, so why not compare the rabbit and the eagle to humans? If a Buddha sacrificed himself as a human being, it is incomprehensible if he does not reach a certain state, otherwise how can he become a Buddha?

I believe that all beings are equal, and there is no distinction between high and low. Humans and animals are both created by nature, and no one has the right to harm sentient beings. Although man is pretentious, compared to nature, he is nothing more than the power of ants. Therefore, we must protect nature and be kind to living beings.

A few words about the third floor, is the flood extinction of human beings and living beings fraternity or cruelty? The extermination of humanity is certainly cruel. But why exterminate your own works?

The Bible says many times that God grieves because of man's sin, and because man repents, he cannot bear to send calamity unless he has to. We don't blame the culling of thousands of non-diseased birds to prevent avian flu, or the doctor sawing off a patient's leg to save his life. If it weren't for Noah's flood, would humanity still exist today?

The Bible does not say that a man has one less rib than a woman, and to use common sense, the offspring of a person with a broken arm will not have one less arm, and there is no unsound in the genes of life because of physical imperfection.

Who told you"people"can only be done"people"And alive? "people"Not for doing"people"And the noble ideals of struggle, you don't understand them at all, stupid!

It's tragic, how can the Buddha's original heart be something that people like us who don't have the great compassion of the Bodhisattva can understand, if you can't understand it, forget it, why bother to talk nonsense and blame others.

The truth is dead, and people are alive, depending on your understanding.

If you don't believe in Buddhism, you don't have to take it seriously.

It is enough to have such a heart. Cutting meat is a bit excessive.

Regardless of his Buddhism, natural selection, survival of the fittest, there is a question I want to ask, is it materialism or idealism.

It is to make offerings to the Buddha with one's own body.

In fact, it is to express one's own faith.

Let's light your fingers...

Make offerings to the Three Jewels and remove obstacles to sin.

To be smart is to make complex things simple, and to be stupid is to make simple things complicated.

There are many kinds of this, such as learning well. Or a quick head. Or wisdom or something.

See, it's better to have a conversation.

It must be the smartest, otherwise he wouldn't be the master of this world! Human beings, standing at the top of the food chain, are proof of it!

Communicate with the people around you, and if you can basically understand their thoughts, then you are very smart.

A really smart person often has a clear understanding of his own strength and has real self-confidence, so he does not need to prove his intelligence through identity. They will not be proud of being students of Peking University, but will only strive to show their problem-solving skills.

8) Show different personalities in front of different people.

They know that they don't have to show their cleverness in front of everyone. Therefore, in front of many people who are not worthy of performance, they will show their ordinary side and will not let "smart" become a burden in their social interactions.

Because of such characteristics, in the eyes of many ordinary people, those smart people sometimes seem to be bland;

Just find a few more people to evaluate yourself, after all, the bystanders are clear.

Confirming the answer to this question is pretty stupid.

Everything has a degree, and if it is excessively called greed, the harm will be boundless.

The wise man sees the benefit and thinks of harm, and the fool sees the benefit and forgets the disaster.

People must be smart, don't be stupid, but be stupid.

Stupidity is good, and the happiest thing is stone.