which style of adidas shoes looks the best I m a woman.

adidas has a special design for girls, I remember calling it the slip series, which is a variation of the slip-on of some classic shoes, which is very feminine.

Superstar would be a little better.

I think superstar is more cute if it's small.

The proportions of the shell heel body of the plus-size Superstar are strange and not good-looking.

Shamrock shell shoes are good-looking.

generally girls like it more .

There is also the one that can be glued to the top of the shoe.

It is more suitable for non-mainstream people to wear.

You can use any color you want, I think Nike is better than Adi, Nike basketball shoes, cricket shoes, 360, ACG, and MAX all look good.

It's up to you what you like. Hehe.

The clover is its earliest logo, and I personally think it's more beautiful. Adi's shoes are very good-looking, its design concept far exceeds the former domestic Li Ning or something, Adi's domestic positioning is about 400 600, basketball shoes 700 + If you really want to buy a good pair of shoes,**Don't say it,3 series of shoes**are all about the same, and there is no series of cheaper. The quality is completely guaranteed.

And it's comfortable to wear.

In fact, it's not just shoes, clothes, pants, bags, etc., all of which are Nike's*** There is no doubt about this It's not that Adidas is bad, but in terms of these two brands, I personally think that Nike's is definitely better than Adidas.

I've been wearing Nike and Adidas clothes, pants and shoes for 13 years now.

First of all, let's talk about the shoes: Adidas shoes have a worn or broken surface, as long as there is a certain point where these problems occur, that place will get worse and worse, and it will affect the whole Nike shoes will not be basically not broken or worn, even if there is a small problem, it will not get worse and worse In short, it is durable My pair of Adidas shoes can only be worn for a maximum of 2 years, and it will not work, and Nike will be fine for 3 years (wear it all the time).

Let's talk about clothes and pants Nike's clothes and pants are not serious after a long time, Adi's will be more obvious, and Adi's clothes and pants will become slightly stiffer after washing too much, and Nike basically won't.

One last mention: Adi's design is more trendy and fashionable, while Nike is slightly inferior.

I accidentally saw your question today, and after thinking about it, after all, more than 10 years of experience can still be given responsibly.

The spirit of the underworld is black and white and full of vitality. The other girl was a little more delicate.

The black and white ones look a little better and are easier to match with clothes.

Personally, I feel that black and white is the most classic!

Personally, I think black and white are more white.

How to say this problem, there is no good thing to say, I can only say a personal opinion, both brands are good brands, Nike now has a stronger market share than Adi, both brands have developed very successfully, and often cooperate with other brands. The quality of the clothes is about the same, the shoes are a little different, Nike's soles have high soft protection performance, not all of Adi's soles are soft, I wear Adi's shoes on my feet, my own experience.

This question is like which is better, BMW or Mercedes, everyone has a different answer, this is a matter of faith

From my point of view, Nike's stuff doesn't quite match my aesthetic. My classmate bought a pair of shox, and it didn't look good. I haven't used much of Nike's products, I only have a set of dry-fit basketball jerseys, and they feel good to wear.

I like ADI more, the A3 Gameday I bought two days ago feels comfortable to wear, and the shock absorption is A3 and Adiprene+ (but the girls in our class say I wear it like an old lady), and I generally think it's stronger than SHOX; I have a pair of ADI sweatpants (single layer, 76% cotton), it was snowing that day, I had a snowball fight, and when I came back, the pants were wet on the outside, but there were no water marks on the inside; I also have an ADI cotton robe, which can be worn as a raincoat in winter when it snows.

I don't want to comment too much on overall performance, but a lot of ADI's technology is a bit more useful than Nike's. The two brands are also similar in terms of materials. When it comes to style, I prefer ADI, I feel that ADI's design is more in line with the Chinese aesthetic, while Nike's design is either too avant-garde or too old-fashioned.

However, this varies from person to person, maybe you are a good fit for Nike, maybe ADI, the decision is yours.

We'll be happy to answer for you.

According to the ** you provided, I helped you conduct a ** search on major e-commerce platforms, and found that this shoe is an Adidas pureboost running shoe, and the following are some detailed parameters.

Product name: adidas Adidas Unisex Winter Sneakers PureBoost Cushioning Marathon Running Shoes S80993 S82010 F35787

SKU: 47943726919

Store: Hanhuan Sports Franchise Store.

Gross Weight: Item No.: S80993 S82010 S81995 AH2319 Upper Material: Fabric.

Category: Starter running shoes.

Season: Spring.

Applicable people: general.

Sole material: carbon rubber.

Purchase hotspot: shock cushioning.

Function: shock absorption, balance, lightweight.

Closure: Tie.

Suitable for road surfaces: floors, runways.

At present, this shoe is available normally on the official website of Adidas and Lucky Leaf.

Adidas PureBoost Running Shoe, item number is S80993