Can an ordinary person win a fight with Taekwondo Kurozo

No, ordinary people must be beaten passively, and I'm afraid they won't be able to survive for a few minutes before they fall.

This is influenced by many factors, but 7 years of taekwondo vs half a year of sanda, if it is not for the kind of soft-footed shrimp style taekwondo training, the winning rate of sanda is less than 40%.

There are also several factors that affect the win rate:

1. To what extent are the rules open, especially how much restriction is imposed on close combat skills;

2. The size of the court, under the rules of K1 Muay Thai, Sanda MMA, etc., if it is a rope court, the smaller it is, the more conducive to the play of the Sanda side;

3. The weight level of the two people, and the physical fitness of Sanda before receiving formal training (strength, endurance, whether the muscles are stiff, and how many bad movement habits).

4. Training method: If the training idea of the taekwondo side is similar to that of the professional team (the training volume is not necessarily so high), it is more conducive to his victory. The same goes for Sanda. If the taekwondo side is a stunt enthusiast, then.

5. How intense is the training? Is it consistent?

It depends on what kind of fighting style it is, and it also depends on the level of both sides, taekwondo black belt does not mean how strong he fights, because the black belt test is not how good you fight, it has a lot of things, such as taekwondo quality of the world, stunt taekwondo, although there is actual combat, but the black belt test focuses on all aspects, not just actual combat. Some people are good at temperament, not competition. If I personally think, I think that the person who learns taekwondo will win, unless that person has not fought in the past few years, the two really fight, but also depends on the physical fitness, taekwondo's legs are faster than Sanda's medicine, Sanda it hands and feet together, and taekwondo can only use straight punches, if it is a fight, taekwondo is better, Sanda only learns for half a year, and the probability of winning is 39%.

First of all, it is necessary to say that the martial arts in the world are one, and there is no winning general in the confrontation project.

Let's talk about the rules first: Taekwondo seems to be able to fall to the ground on its own initiative, right? Not allowed to hit below the torso? Not allowed to punch the head? Sanda is a combination of punches and kicks, straight hooks, whip kicks, side kicks, and all throws that land on the ground outside the opponent's feet as the main attack, right?

For the sake of fairness: 1. There must be a ring, that is, there are regional restrictions. Both are available in the game.

2. All wear protective gear to protect taekwondo players, which is not conducive to sanda.

3. When the opponent falls to the ground, you score.

4. Sanda is not allowed to kick below the torso of taekwondo.

In this case, half a year Sanda will chase after seven years of taekwon, mostly with fists close to the body and easily fall the opponent, if you don't get knocked down, you will win.

A master taekwondo player can only use his blocking leg to seize the opportunity to knock out the opponent, and if he can't knock the opponent, he will be broken or knocked down by the opponent. Defeated.

Remove the 3 mentioned above, and the consequences are as follows: Sanda is still the same, taekwondo runs all over the stage, scores with blocking legs, and he always falls to the ground in embarrassment. If you can't defeat your opponent with scattered blows, you will be defeated. Taekwondo wins by points.

If you remove 4, taekwondo will be defeated, because no matter how fast the legs are, there is no fast punches, and there are no heavy blows in the taekwondo legs, and it is easy to fall on the legs. The thigh is kicked in both legs and naturally abstains, and there is no resistance to the blow.

7 years of taekwondo, it depends on your training environment and coaching level, plus the level of your brothers and sisters. Because it is useless to train on its own without confrontation, and it is useless to feel the conditioning from distance to actual combat. Sanda and taekwondo are both competitive sports.

It's useless to bring anything without actual combat experience, and it's the same with Sanda.

The most important thing to say, don't fight such a non-level confrontation, the rules determine a sport, there is no one better than whom, any form of martial arts, is to challenge yourself with yourself, want to win, psychological quality is the most important, so there are training and competition shapes, which form do you belong to?

Hehe, talk nonsense after dinner, please criticize more.

Taekwondo is also divided into many kinds, style, competition, performance, you have to try to compete with the black belt more than 2 if you let go to play, then it depends on your screening, but it should still be a better chance of winning your game, it should be suitable for street confrontation, although now some troops practice sanda, but also practice taekwondo, our brigade is. If the rules are restricted, taekwondo should be bigger.

He has fought in taekwondo, but he has never played a black belt, and he has only played a red belt at the highest. Based on my experience and estimates, it mainly depends on the rules. If you use sanda rules or unrestricted fighting.

Sanda has a higher win rate, at least above 50%. After all, after the body of the regiment snatched the chamber, one fell and one leaned, and the killing and destruction of taekwondo's moves were very great.

What rules do you follow?Theoretically, it's okay (of course, personal physical strength, height, or something also has a lot to do with it.、It mainly depends on the level of the individual.、Our side of the gym also has a yellow belt to win a black belt ==,

Objectively speaking, the probability of winning a black belt in taekwondo is 70%, according to the objective level of black belt.

Sanda because there is no level, if you study for half a year, it depends on his understanding, it shouldn't be too strong......

Taekwondo wins.

Half a year of sanda combat experience can not be rich, 7 years of taekwondo even if the actual combat experience is better than sanda... In actual combat, experience is everything...

I learned taekwondo....Taekwondo National Class 1 Athlete....Taekwondo sanda is a bit of a disadvantage....You must not mess out of your legs when you play sanda, and you must watch the distance....Use footwork to mobilize the opponent to attack and counterattack and meet the attack....Sanda's leg method has a large amplitude, so it is very slow to close the legs....Fists are not as long as your legs...So you mobilize him....When he strikes, you use the simplest step back to counter (he has a wide range of legs, and he is slow to return to his center of gravity after kicking)...If he throws a punch, you just lie down and kick him with your legs...Remember to close your leg and distance yourself when you're done....Be sure to close your legs quickly....Otherwise, he'll kill you with just a leg amputation...Be sure to control the distance and not enter...I hope my answer will help you a little.

Asking this question would have been a mistake! You can't say who wins the fight, every kung fu is useful, just see if you can apply it flexibly! But when it comes to practicality, it is still sanda, taekwondo is handsome and has many moves, but it is not as direct as sanda

No, it's okay to have two. Taekwondo is fast, and Sanda has a strong attack power.

By what rules? Can you fall? Can you kick the legs, punch the head and face? Do you wear protective gear? The rules are very important, but it also depends on your personal cultivation and quality, and it doesn't make sense to ask for chances, there are only two results.

If you let go of the fight and sanda and you can throw it with your fists and feet, you won't have a chance.

Truth be told, Taekwondo combat application is too poor.