What is the best choice for the computer to install the CPU?

Core E8400 + ASUS P5Q + Ӱ 9800GTX+ Admiral Edition. The motherboard is P45, and the graphics card comes with features such as physical acceleration cards and CUDA. Here's a word about AMD.

AMD's advantage in gaming is no longer present when the Pentium series with Core cores is launched. Triple cores are not necessary, as programs are now more optimized for dual-core and quad-core processors and less optimized for triple-cores. Even AMD's K10 architecture generates much more heat than processors of the same level as Core, and the 45nm process of the Core 8 series is superior in terms of stability, heat, execution efficiency, and power consumption.

And there is a very important reason that the core dual-core and quad-core both use the 775 interface, and you can directly change the processor when you upgrade it in the future, and the P45 is more than enough to run the quad-core. The AMD triple core and dual core generally use AM2 and AM2+ interfaces, while the quad-core uses the AM3 interface, which means that you need to change the motherboard to upgrade to the quad-core in the future. Now the quad-core ** is gradually declining, there will be more and more programs optimized for the quad-core, coupled with the impact of i7 on the market, the ordinary quad-core will soon highlight its cost performance, and at this time, I am afraid that the vitality of the quad-core will not be so durable.

Thinking about upgrading later, you should choose Core's platform. However, it should be noted that the Core E8400 has an external frequency of 333, so you need DDR3 1333 memory to match it to maximize performance. But two DDR2 800 dual-channels can also meet Core's bandwidth needs.

But the Intel platform has one biggest drawback, which is a bit higher than the A platform.

In fact, it is best to determine the direction of your own needs The choice of platform will affect the difference in the overall configuration After all, the budget is there If the drawing requirements are relatively high, it is recommended to choose on the high-end A card The cost performance will be higher than that of the N card Personal use To have stable performance If you have good performance in all aspects, it is recommended to use E8400 AMD in dual core, which is cost-effective But don't underestimate the difference between 45nm and 65nm That will save you a lot of money in long-term use Therefore, the investment in the early stage does not affect the reduction of cost performance Memory If there is a Jinbang, of course, it is better than the popular Kingston But**It is also high The hard disk to 500g It is recommended to use Western Digital There have been large hard disks, and the WestJet speed is slow So the general idea is down E8400 board It can be basically determined that it is P45 After all, it is already a big mainstream Recommended Spartak Kuroshio's BI-500 499** The parameters in all aspects are good The 6-layer blackboard used is very cost-effective and supports crossfire Many experts have got quite good results on overclocking on this board Graphics card Recommend Onda 4830 800SP Be sure to note that it is 800SP The performance is comparable to 4850 Of course, you can choose Sapphire if you have the conditions Sapphire 4830 800SP is called by the god card crown Power supply depends on the budget If it is around 400 Huntkey multi-core DH6 is the first choice for most players Or Kangshu IP470 Dual 12V power supply is higher than DH6 There are no requirements for the chassis Try to be bigger There is still a difference in heat dissipation The whole set of configurations is combined.

CPU: E8400 (with optional Q8300) Memory: Goldbond 2G DDR800 2

Hard disk: WD Western Digital 500G SATA 32M graphics card: Onda 4830 800SP

Power supply: Kangshu IP470 is the first to be recommended

Chassis: Recommended TT Destroyer.

CPU AMD Phenom IX4 920 (Box) 1 1280 1280 Total 52 Merchants.

Motherboard Yingtai TA790GX A3+ 1 899 899 total 39 Merchants.

RAM ADATA 2G DDR2 800+ (Extreme Dragon) 3 210 210 49 Merchants.

HDD Seagate 500GB 16M(Serial Port) 1 395 395 72 Merchants.

Graphics card Dilan Hengjin HD4870 Fire Drill 1 1199 1199 total 29 merchants.

LCD Samsung T220 1 1460 1460 162 total from 162 merchants.

Chassis Power Train Dustless 2008 1 368 368 11 total merchants.

Power Supply Extreme Power Plus 50 1 430 430 Total 18 Merchants.

Keyboard & Mouse Combo Logitech G1 Gaming Keyboard & Mouse Combo 1 178 178 32 results.

Radiator TT Golden Orb II(CL-P0220) Golden Pineapple 1 238 238 6 Sold in 6 results.

Total amount: 7,077 yuan.

Good horses with good saddles, good graphics cards are on, why not on the good U 3A DDR3 dragon platform.

If you play games, you can choose AMD, it's cheap and affordable, Intel's is too expensive, if you have money, you can buy the 8400 upstairs.

Intel E8400 U was supposed to enter today, but it turned out to be overspent and directly changed to the AMD platform of 7750.

With Jetbolt's HA03 GT3 (DDR2 and DDR3 memory) is only 450

AMD is good for playing games, but it has high requirements for heat dissipation.

At present, the high and high nano-lead round end of the CPU on the market are equipped with 2M L2 cache, and the high-end point has 4M cache, the larger the cache, the faster the CPU operation speed collapses. You can choose according to your needs.

In the field of processors, Intel and AMD's series of actions have made more and more users turn their attention to dual-core processors, bombarding land or price reductions through advertising, and currently Pentium D

820 and Pentium 4

The price difference of 630 is only 100 yuan, should we abandon the traditional single-core processor and throw ourselves into the arms of dual-core?

The words "single-core" and "dual-core" may not be intuitive for readers, so let's take a look at the differences between the two in terms of application. What aspects of the application are suitable for each.

What kind of application should choose a single-core platform?

Before 05 years, all the processors we used were single-core processors, and there are two main ways to improve the performance of single-core processors: increasing the processor frequency and increasing the processor's L2 cache capacity, increasing the frequency as one of the most important means to improve processor performance, which has been with the birth of the processor for many years, let's take a look at which applications should choose a single-core platform.

1. Play the game wholeheartedly without other operations;

2. For ordinary enterprise office users, the purpose of the computer is only to process documents, send and receive emails, and communicate with customers on QQ or MSN;

3. Small installed budget, the pursuit of practical economic users;

Traditional single-core is not obsolete.

To sum up, we believe that for ordinary office users, as well as users who do not involve multi-threaded applications, choosing a single-base collapse-core processor with sufficient performance can meet the requirements. For those who love large-scale 3D games, if you're just concentrating on gaming, a single-core processor is sufficient.

According to the needs of the individual.

Hehe, as long as you have more money, the better.

It depends on the price you pay.

It depends on what price you buy.

It depends on what you usually do.

Look at individual needs. Fit is king.

There are inter and amd, depending on what you want.