What if a sibling admits to borrowing a house and the parents pay the bill?

This mainly depends on the operation of borrowing a name to buy a house at that time.

If there is a written agreement between the two parties when buying a house in a borrowed name, there is no problem, as long as it is performed in accordance with the agreement.

If there is no evidence of either of the above, then there is no way.

In fact, when children buy a house in the name of their parents, they must enjoy some kind of preferential policies related to real estate on their parents, and as long as the borrower returns this preferential treatment to his parents, it can also be resolved through negotiation.

Whoever is in the name on the real estate deed and the house belongs to whom, which is not called a debt. As for how the internal arrangements were made at that time, they need to be resolved through negotiation, and if the negotiation fails, they can also take judicial channels. If there is evidence that the parents' house was purchased by the siblings, and the parents refuse to transfer it, the court will generally order the parents to return the purchase price and interest, and that's it.

Parents can't help it, after all, it's the parents, and the best way between relatives is to discuss and settle it, as you said, even if you prosecute, the evidence is not good for you.

In this case, it is best to solve it by coordination, the coordination is not good, only the lawsuit, the brothers and sisters are your witnesses, since it is a borrowed name to buy a house, all the invoice deed tax bills when buying a house should be in your own hands, it is physical evidence, but this kind of family lawsuit is more difficult to fight.

Although you know that your parents are in arrears, there is no way, since your parents have defaulted on the debts, for the sake of your parents' nurturing grace to you, the whole family will work together to make a written justice to the house, and in the future, when the old man dies, the house will naturally be attributed to the name of the children who bought the house, and there will be no more children fighting for inheritance.

If the parents buy a house in the name of their children, the name of the house belongs to the children, and the parents do not pay for the house, the children can pay first, and the parents live, and when the parents pass away, the house will naturally belong to the children; If a child buys a house in the name of his parents, the name of the house is in the name of the parents, and the children pay for the house, but the parents do not pay the house to the children, as long as the parents do not sell the house, they will still be the children in the future. All in all, it's a bit long.

What should I do if my siblings admit to borrowing their names to buy a house, but my parents pay the bills? This situation is difficult to resolve without evidence. You can't help it if your parents don't admit you, after all, you are your biological parents.

Giving birth to you and raising your benefactor. Or maybe your parents have other reasons as well. I can't tell you just what you say.

Hello, for parents, there is no way to rely on their own house, they can only solve it through communication!

Communicate first. Communication is fruitless, prepare evidence for civil litigation, even if it is a relative, it is two natural persons.

Since it is the parents who are in debt, there is no good way to solve it.

Parents are actually typical representatives of killing the rich and helping the poor.

Do it yourself, don't always want to gnaw on the old.

You make things clear so that we can make recommendations.

1. Who buys a house in the name of his parents.

1. Look at the type of property.

If the buyer purchases an ordinary commercial house and the two parties have a clear agreement to sign a borrowed name purchase agreement, the agreement is valid and the borrower's claim can be supported. However, once the house has been sealed, transferred to a bona fide third party, or there are other reasons for not being able to transfer the ownership, the claim that the borrower requests the celebrity to handle the transfer cannot be established.

If the buyer purchases affordable housing such as affordable housing, the borrowed name purchase agreement signed by both parties is generally deemed invalid because it violates relevant policies and regulations and infringes on the interests of other buyers who are qualified to purchase the house.

2. Sufficient evidence.

Even if the buyer buys the house in the name of his parents, but the real property becomes effective after the registration of the real estate, the registered owner is presumed to be the owner of the property, unless there is sufficient evidence to overturn the contents of the title register. The court will usually make a comprehensive judgment based on factors such as the capital contribution of the house, the occupation and use of the house, the purchase bills, contracts, and the holding of the house ownership certificate, and whether there is a reasonable explanation for the fact of borrowing the name to purchase the house.

3. Contractual.

After all, the contract is only an internal agreement, and it must be changed and registered before the real right can take effect, and the effect of the change of property right cannot be produced only by virtue of the agreed creditor's rights. When a borrower files a lawsuit with the court, he or she shall file a contract lawsuit based on the borrowed name purchase contract signed by both parties, requiring the other party to handle the transfer of ownership in accordance with the contract, but cannot directly ask the court to confirm that the house belongs to him.

2. How to deal with disputes over borrowing a name to buy a house.

If the purchaser can provide evidence to prove that there is indeed a capital contribution relationship in the purchase of the house, but it is insufficient to prove that there is evidence of borrowed name registration between the two parties, and his claim to confirm that the house belongs to him or to request the registrant to register the transfer of ownership of the house shall not be supported; If it separately claims the creditor's right of capital contribution from the registrant, it shall be handled in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations according to the nature of the capital contribution.

Where the parties agree that one party purchases a house in the name of another person and registers the house in the name of another person, and the borrower actually enjoys the rights and interests of the house, and the borrower requests the registrant (the borrower) to handle the registration of the transfer of ownership of the house in accordance with the contract, it may be supported. Otherwise, the funder can only claim to the other party that the two parties have formed a creditor-debtor relationship of the loan, and the funder can only recover the loan and its interest, but cannot obtain the ownership of the house.

My house is in my dad's name, but now he doesn't want to buy it.

Hello question. Hello, I bought a house in someone else's name. Now he is being sued by the bank.

2. If the negotiation fails, the investor needs to collect evidence of capital contribution, evidence of buying a house in his name, etc., and sue the court where the property is located.

Ask if his property will be confiscated.

He now owes money on his credit card.

Ask what I should do now.

All the costs of the house are from the king.

It's okay for you to make it clear to the bank.

In the event of a dispute over the purchase of a house in a borrowed name, the title deed is not the only criterion for confirming the ownership of the property. If a party requests confirmation of ownership of a property registered in another person's name, the court will comprehensively determine the real owner of the property based on the content of the agreement between the parties, the capital contribution for the purchase of the house, and the actual use of the house.

According to the principle of equivalent compensation, the house should generally be owned by the actual funder. If you can't provide evidence, it's hard to get it back.

Whether it is valid to buy a house in a borrowed name mainly depends on whether there is a borrowing agreement between the borrower (the actual purchaser) and the seller (the house registrant).