Should the ideal talent be based on benevolence or wisdom? 50

Please, are you positive or negative?

There is a point of view: governing the world is based on "benevolence", even if the ability is average, the charisma of "benevolence" can still be well played.

In troubled times, "talents" are required to have stronger "ability", that is, "wisdom".

This is also the reason why Cao Cao advocated "meritocracy", so although Cao Cao had many unfilial sons and greedy [harmony] criminals, he was still able to govern the country better than the other two.

I'll add that when you make your position clear......

I am benevolent, can you give some examples, questions?"

Your supplement received, if it's just "examples", "questions", it's not difficult, for example:

There is "wisdom", but there is no "benevolence", it is the most terrible, for example, those scientists who invented a large number of advanced ** for Hitler, that is called "aiding and abetting", the smarter they are, the more they invent, the deeper the suffering of mankind.

Wisdom itself does not matter whether it is good or bad, it depends on what it is used for, and only those with high morals can use wisdom (the wisdom of all people, including those who are not morally noble) to be used in beneficial ways, on the contrary, good research results with low moral standards can also become very harmful things in their hands.

For example, the invention of sedatives was supposed to be a good thing to save people, but it was used as a poison [harmony] by people with ulterior motives.

Another example (the next example, if your psychological tolerance is relatively fragile, it is recommended not to look at it).

For another example, I once read a World War II historical material, which is a ** episode. **In the middle is a beautifully crafted table lamp, with a soft light and exquisite shape, but after reading the text description, I immediately felt very uncomfortable - it was a table lamp made of Jewish [human skin].

No matter how clever, "intellectual" and skilled the maker of this lamp is, his inhumane practice of using "human skin" as a material will never make us call him ...... "ideal talent".

As long as you divide "morality" to the extreme, only good and bad, only "benevolence" and "non-benevolence", and there is no intermediate part, then there are many, many examples for you to use to prove the importance of "benevolence".

Benevolence, people who truly understand the meaning of benevolence will truly understand what they want to do, their own value and what they want to pursue. Their ideals will be lofty and valuable. Like a ship traveling far away, benevolence is the direction and goal.

Wisdom is how to help you reach your destination as quickly as possible. No matter how good the method is, no matter how good the planning is, what is the use without destination and direction? Benevolence is the ideal direction.

And the ideal is the direction of a person.

If wisdom is understood as small cleverness, then benevolence and wisdom are opposites.

If wisdom is understood as great wisdom, then benevolence and wisdom are actually unified.

I guess the basis of your debate should be the latter, right? So this kind of debate will be fundamentally meaningless, but from a professional point of view, then participate, but this is just a sophistry society for people, don't take it too seriously, the winner of the debate does not represent the side that holds the truth.

Friend, your problem is that you should first understand the difference between talent and people. As a person, he should be a person who is moral, educated, cultivated, and well-rounded in all aspects; Talents, on the other hand, are mainly people with certain professional expertise. Confucius said:

Gentlemen don't have instruments. That is to say, as a gentleman, you will not be based on society as a certain kind of professional; The ideas of Confucius coincided with those of the philosophers of ancient Greece in the West, and the ancient Greeks were proud of the uselessness of their learning!

Benevolence without wisdom is easy to be used to aid and abet abuse.

Wisdom but no benevolence belong to the small clever, selfish, and cannot benefit the country and the people.

It's indispensable.

Ren, you must first learn to be a person when you do anything! Without benevolence, wisdom alone is equal to not being human! My opinion! Uh-huh!

It's hard to say, there should be all of them.

The ideal talent is based on benevolence, which means that the person who conforms to the hope and satisfies the people, and his morality, conduct, and political qualities should and must be important and basic.

By extension, a person can only transform his wisdom into useful wealth for the motherland and the people if he is motivated by noble morality, and a person without noble morality, no matter how smart he is, cannot do anything for the motherland and the people.

Ideal talent refers to the ideal talent needed by enterprises and society, and it is not the person that each of us wants to become, which is an objective judgment. Secondly, the interpretation of benevolence should not only be understood as benevolence, righteousness and morality, but also a person's inner cultivation, ability to distinguish between right and wrong, psychological maturity and high emotional intelligence.

The method is as follows: 1. First put forward the importance of "wisdom" to talents, ask the other party whether they admit it, and focus on wisdom is not only using wisdom, which is easy to be attacked by the answer, and must stand still.

2. Emphasizing the importance of wisdom does not mean denying the importance of "body" and lifting. We must let the old other party admit that if you are not wise, you are not talented, and if you have no body, you can be talented.

Summary. First of all, the role of benevolence must not be denied, but we can only say that human beings are a secondary issue. This must be remembered and the role of benevolence cannot be denied.

The example of the main statement is very unfavorable to the opposite side, we can only say that the cultivation of talents is based on ability and intelligence, so why is the ideal talent who stands out from the talent based on people? ? Our training from childhood to adulthood, the selection after becoming a talent, and the creation of value in our work are all based on wisdom, so when we become or this is an ideal talent, we should be people-oriented? If this is the case, does it mean that our current education method is wrong?

At the same time, it should be noted that the dictionary explanation of benevolence is benevolence, and if the other party mentions Confucianism, it must not be recognized that benevolence is morality, and if the other party says that it is the main role of popularity when ideal talents create social value. So how does this benevolence create value, what kind of benevolence can create value, in any case, we must remember that the creation of value has always been wisdom, benevolence can only be said to be a choice to reflect value, but this choice can be a certain degree of value enhancement.

Which is more important, "benevolence" or "wisdom", we are more important, and I am the second argument of the opposing side.

First of all, the role of benevolence must not be denied, but we can only say that human beings are a secondary issue. This must be remembered and the role of benevolence cannot be denied. The example of the main statement is very unfavorable to the opposite side, we can only say that the cultivation of talents is based on ability and intelligence, so why is the ideal talent who stands out from the talent based on people? ?

Our training from childhood to adulthood, the selection after becoming a talent, and the creation of value in our work are all based on wisdom, so when we become or this is an ideal talent, we should be people-oriented? If this is the case, does it mean that our current education method is wrong? At the same time, it should be noted that the dictionary explanation of benevolence is benevolence, and if the other party mentions Confucianism, it must not be recognized that benevolence is morality, and if the other party says that it is the main role of popularity when ideal talents create social value.

So how does this benevolence create value, what kind of benevolence can create value, in any case, we must remember that the creation of value has always been wisdom, benevolence can only be said to be a choice to reflect value, but this choice can be a certain degree of value enhancement.

Is there anything else? No, it's gone.

Benevolence-oriented: benevolence without wisdom, just less contribution; If you are wise and unkind, you will bring disaster to the country and the people.

The ideal talent is based on benevolence, and the ideal talent is based on wisdom.

In fact, you can find keywords in this topic. There is only one word different from the whole title. Most people will argue around these 2 different words.

Benevolence and wisdom, in fact, in this regard,. Personally, I don't think it's a very good place to debate, what is benevolence, what is wisdom, what is the scope of benevolence and wisdom, and how can we distinguish the difference between unkindness and benevolence, unwisdom and wisdom... If you don't grasp this degree well, you will be very passive in the field, and you will not be able to impress the hearts of the judges.

Personally, I think. First to find out more about the meaning of benevolence and wisdom, and then define the side that is beneficial to yourself, grasp the degree, the bottom line is the last word of the topic, the "main" ideal talent is based on benevolence, and you can add a supplement to yourself later, "Our point of view is that the ideal talent is based on benevolence, supplemented by wisdom, and it is not that there is no need for wisdom" so that it is more euphemistic, I think it can better explain the point of view that is beneficial to yourself, and vice versa. Hope that helps.