Is it certain or not necessarily in the world?

When the first condition of this assumption is changed, the problem is easy.

According to common sense, there is something in the world, just as movement is absolute, then there is no afterthought.

If there is a cause, there will be an effect, but it is not necessary to say what kind of effect there is, which is "certain" and "not necessarily".

You have to believe the following sentence.

You can't believe the above sentence.

You're just talking about paradoxes. Many things cannot be considered logically, but must be experienced by feeling.

One life is two, two is three, and three is everything. Where there is a cause, there must be an effect. The direction of the development of events is inevitable, because there is a "cause", so it is certain.

It's old-fashioned, but it doesn't have to be. Look at the ease of learning, don't say you understand, it's not easy to don't faint you.

I cling to the heart of the universe, looking at the stars and the dust.

It is difficult for those who come to come, and those who go are not right, and they are crazy and sick', it is my fault, and the disease of people is also.

The road of yin and yang, the road of life and death, is difficult to walk and cherished.

The word "certainly" is not clear enough, for example, people must die, which is a law that cannot be refuted in the literal sense of the word. But everything may turn out to be similar, may be essentially the same, but still unique, so you can't use the word "definitely", the landlord can refer to a question I once asked.

They gave me a good answer.

Hehe, to paraphrase an advertisement: everything is possible Hehe.

There is no absolute, and the absolute is the absolute. The only absolute.

Chance involves necessity.

What happened happened involved countless efforts.

But no amount of effort will necessarily lead to success.

There is not necessarily a certainty.

But it doesn't have to be certain.

The only constant in the world is change! Not always constant is the thing!

Personally, I think it should be like this. When I can't control my own destiny, I can't control what happens around me, I often comfort myself like this, I say that everything is a fateful decision, sometimes it is true, we find that some things are developing, Guizhou is not the same as we think, why is this? This is because we are destined in life, so we sometimes don't need to force fate too much, and everything that is destined is said that we can't resist fate.

So sometimes don't be too forced, sometimes it's best for us to really go with the flow.

What does life look like? Innocent? Dazzling?

Or is it a climb to the top? And after that? I can't answer.

Therefore, I believe in cherishing the present moment and living in the moment. Therefore, when we think that one is life, everything is lost! Zero.

What has happened to us is from Jehovah! There is a definite number for everything, there is a time for life and a time for death!

1 It is impossible to follow the theory of evidence. If there is so-called evidence of homicide. That is also a testimony, or false testimony. It can only be said that the investigation of the case is not meticulous enough. Blinded by some so-called evidence. As a result, unjust, false and wrongly decided cases have been caused.

2. In our country's legal system, it is proof of guilt rather than proof of innocence. That is to say, when a person kills someone, he must prove that he killed through evidence. And not through evidence to prove that he did not kill.

So theoretically, it is impossible for a person to not kill someone, but it can be proved through a chain of evidence that he killed someone.

3. The Supreme Court has the power to terminate the execution. Where an individual does not have the right to terminate the execution, it reaches the stage of execution. Relying on the suspects themselves to shout wrongs will not work at all.

Wrong, just shouting will not work.

This person really didn't kill anyone, but there is evidence to prove that he killed people is contradictory to what you said. Assuming that the person did not commit such a criminal act, we would certainly be able to find out the problem from the evidence obtained by the investigative authorities. Evidence needs to form a chain of evidence and corroborate each other.

At present, the case-handling organs will pay more attention to the collection of evidence of the person's guilt, which is commonly known as the presumption of guilt.

It is recommended that you find a professional lawyer, and at the public prosecution stage, you can make copies of the case file, understand the evidence obtained by the case-handling organ, verify the evidence, and find out the problems from the evidence, which is the key to solving the problem.

You may not be very familiar with the extraction of evidence at the scene, but if these assumptions exist, it will leave new traces of physical evidence at the scene, which can be extracted by the on-site investigators.

What cannot be ** is "complexity", and what is non-decisive is "randomness", and human beings cannot predict history, but history can still be decisive, and events exist and develop automatically outside of our consciousness. The essence of all science, including modern quantum mechanics, is a "narrative". The narrative of the objective world* cannot escape the cage of language and organs, and the world is transcendental

First of all, the so-called objective truth of science is only a composite of elements obtained from human organs and summarized into them, and only has a non-strict state suspicion of self-consistency. Secondly, science needs to be based on the premise of language to be possible, so science is not an "event" itself, but a self-consistent means of telling events, and it cannot prove the illegitimacy of other means. The objective world refers to the sum total of all appearances in our minds, not the inexplicable and imperceptible first world composed of things themselves.

I hate the definition of "materialism" and "idealism" in philosophy, which is itself a convenient term that has been produced in a specific historical period, so please reduce the number of times you use it.