How to debate the ideal talent is based on intelligence

Debate should find a good topic to discern.

The method is as follows: 1. First put forward the importance of "wisdom" to talents, ask the other party whether they admit it, and focus on wisdom is not only using wisdom, which is easy to be attacked by the answer, and must stand still.

2. Emphasizing the importance of wisdom does not mean denying the importance of "body" and lifting. We must let the old other party admit that if you are not wise, you are not talented, and if you have no body, you can be talented.

Summary. Hello, I found the debate question for you, I am the right side to be wise, and we won. The main is reflected in the starting point of your decision-making, based on wisdom, the decision to make is more about how to promote development, and benevolence-based, that is, how to harmoniously come.

The point of the debate is that we cannot be absolute, and we must not say that we should be based on wisdom as having no benevolence, and that we should not be able to say that we are mainly benevolent, and that we should not be able to say that we are not wise. This debate is still based on examples, otherwise it will seem very empty and weak. I hope you can win the debate!!

Hope mine can help you, thanks!

In the debate competition, the topic is: Is the ideal talent based on benevolence or wisdom?

Hello, I have seen your question and am sorting out the answer, please wait a while Hello, I found the debate question for you I am the main one with wisdom, and we won. The main is reflected in the starting point of your decision, Qing Pai Tong is based on wisdom, and the decision to make is more about how to promote development and how to come, and benevolence is the main thing, which is how to be harmonious. The point of the debate is that we cannot be absolute, and we cannot say that we have no wisdom and that we have no benevolence, and that we cannot say that we have no wisdom when we are based on wisdom.

This debate is still based on examples, otherwise it will seem very empty and incompetent. I hope you can win the debate!! Hope mine can help you, thanks!

3. Argument and Argument Questions: 1May I ask the opponent's defense friend, should the ideal talent play a role in promoting economic development?

Yes: In today's vigorous development of the knowledge economy, shouldn't the ideal talents who contribute to economic development be based on intelligence? It's not:

Economic development is the mainstream of today's era, but the ideal talent in the mouth of the opponent's debater cannot promote economic development, can he use the Four Books and the Five Classics to send the Sixth Divine Soul into space? It is not to contribute to economic development, but to contribute to social development: social development should focus on economic construction!

Is it possible to achieve communism with a mouth full of benevolence, righteousness, and morality? 2.Should the ideal talent contribute to the development of society and history?

Who made a greater contribution to the development of history, Wu Zetian, who was mainly wise, and Emperor Jianwen of the Ming Dynasty, who was mainly benevolent? Zhu Di is not benevolent: But he has promoted the development of history, which shows that ideal talents should focus on wisdom!

3.What is the basis of a country's comprehensive national strength? Economy and technology.

Doesn't this require the ideal talent to be intellectual? 4.In China, collectivism is the core, while the West advocates individual interests.

Doesn't this mean that different regions have different evaluation criteria for people? In this way, if the talent in the East is not bright in the West, how can it be ideal? Free Debate Questions:

1.Ma Tan lost the street pavilion, Zhuge Liang, as an ideal talent, adapted to the wise military law of killing Ma Tan, or should he benevolently cover it up? 2.

We spend four years in college learning professional knowledge but only half a year to study meditation, doesn't this mean that the ideal talent should focus on wisdom? 3.The law is not merciful, and according to the opinion of the opponent's defense friend, the law-makers and enforcers are not ideal talents?

4.Why does China use the college entrance examination system of examining wisdom to select talents, instead of using the system of examining benevolence? 5.

With the scientist releasing the Brazilian turtle out of benevolence and almost causing an ecological disaster, is he the ideal talent in the mouth of the opponent's defense friend? 6.It is unkind to deceive others, but soldiers are not tired of deceit, according to the other party's argument friend's point of view, those who have used deception to lure the enemy in the march and battle****** they are not ideal talents?

7.At present, social development requires continuous innovation, is it easier to innovate for talents based on benevolence or for talents based on wisdom? 8.

Why is there a written test followed by an interview for graduate school examinations? Isn't it because the ideal talent should be based on wisdom?

There is no opening line.

1. Ideal talents should be benevolent.

Benevolence, which Confucius regarded as the highest moral principle, moral standard and moral realm, is enough to see the importance of benevolence in the hearts of Confucian saints. Benevolence is a state of thought, morality, and self-cultivation. Whereas wisdom is an interpretation of reason, knowledge, and insight.

Wisdom can be obtained through learning, but benevolence cannot be learned from others, and all insights can only be obtained by one's own understanding and understanding. Therefore, it is even more rare for benevolent people. And if a person is wise and excellent, but his inner cultivation is not good, he cannot be called a talent.

If a person is not good at studying, but he is good inside, benevolent and righteous, then he is also a very rare person.

It is not easy to obtain benevolence, and the society needs people with moral cultivation more, and the inner is the most important, and the support of Confucius argues).

2. Ideal talents should be based on intelligence.

No matter how good benevolence and righteousness are, it is wisdom that really promotes social development. In a society without wisdom and benevolence, no matter how rich it is, what will be used to develop and what to create? And in many ways, benevolence is righteousness, but at this time, stressing righteousness destroys principles and rules.

At this time, we must look at the problem with a rational eye, and do not talk about benevolence and righteousness when it is time to distinguish between public and private. Otherwise, Bao Zheng's relatives made a mistake, and how distressed Bao Zheng was at that time, he still dealt with it according to law. If he only talks about benevolence between relatives and not about fair wisdom, then is he still the people's blue sky?

From the aspect of promoting society, from the aspect of public and private).

Well, that's all you can think about

Thank you, Chair!

Distinguished judges, friends of the opposing party, good evening!

After singing the song "Seeing Flowers in the Fog", the opponent's defense friend only made people feel like falling clouds and mist, and did not distinguish between north and south. Let me start by pointing out a few vulnerabilities on your side!

Today, the opponent's defense friend is partial and covers the whole in his arguments, only saying that benevolence is the improvement of relative morality, but does not talk about the role of benevolence in cultivating talents. What we are talking about today is the cultivation of talents, and the so-called talents refer to people who have both ability and political integrity. The opponent's defense friend is obviously unfair to us in this way.

Second, the opponent's defense friend believes that any righteous act or benevolent act is the result of intellectual judgment, which is obviously contrary to the facts. Do you judge whether a person can be your friend by some formula or by which theory it seems? If so, please give an example.

Let's take a look at our debate first!

First, we have already made it clear in our opening argument that the direction of our discussion today should be: In the process of cultivating ideal talents, it is benevolence or wisdom that plays a major role. Here, benevolence and wisdom are both independent, and flying one is the basis of the other.

If, as you say, benevolence works through wisdom, then is there any point in our discussion today?

Second, what is an ideal talent? The answer to this question must be grounded in today's society and meet the needs of society. With the slogan of harmonious China, the call of benevolence began to resound throughout the land of China and even around the world.

More and more people are recognizing that the importance of talent, emotional intelligence, is more important than IQ. And a talent with the quality of benevolence is the ideal talent that this society needs.

Third, the connotation of benevolence is very broad. More than 2,000 years ago, Confucius explained that benevolence means: respect, generosity, faithfulness, sensitivity, and wisdom.

These five words succinctly summarize the height and width of Ren. Respectful, generous, tolerant, faithful, honest, diligent and compassionate. It can be seen that benevolence is not only a noble moral quality, but also a driving force to promote the progress of human society and constantly create and develop.

The opposing side of the debate attributed all the cases of successful individuals to the role of wisdom, and ignored the many valuable qualities that they possess as individuals. Neonton, Edison, Einstein and other great men all grew up in adversity and insisted on scientific exploration in the face of setbacks and failures. Fortune 500 companies such as Microsoft and Procter & Gamble have all used team collaboration to achieve and consolidate their extraordinary achievements.

Thinking back to the snow disaster a month ago, isn't it the best powerful measures, human care, and the full support of the people of the whole country that make the disaster no longer terrible, and the ice and snow no longer cold?

Hesitant in the fog of the other party, please accept our friendly hands, with us into the warm world of benevolence!

A wise person is benevolent and righteous, because under the condition of survival of the fittest, he will change his character and become a benevolent and righteous person, but a benevolent and righteous person is not necessarily wise, because benevolence and righteousness can make people indecisive and cannot become a wise person.