What are the disadvantages of Pentax kx, ask Pentax K5 disadvantages

I use kx myself.

I don't need to talk about the advantages of KX, a super cost-effective machine.

Cons, 1The viewfinder does not have a red dot focus, you need to select the focus point on the LCD screen, although it is eleven o'clock focus, but it is still too troublesome to choose on the LCD [in fact, I guess that if Pentax does not remove the red dot of the KX, I am afraid that the seller of the K7 will be thundered. 】

The battery is heavier than the lithium battery, it is best to use the low self-discharge battery of Sanyo Elop, and the others are free, don't be reluctant to pay for the dozens of dollars. Because other batteries have low battery life on KX, Pinsheng is the same, and there is a bug that displays the power. If it is an Elop battery, the minimum can be more than 1,000 shots.

There is not much flash, with ** playback. 】

3.The kind of problem I have to mention on the first floor, Canon's machines are all CMOS, 500D, 50D, too. The price difference between 500D and KX must be known to the landlord.

The Nikon D90 is almost a mid-range machine, the same CMOS. This is not a disadvantage at all. If you really want to count,I'm helpless.,I can't ask for a good function, good quality, cheap entry machine cost performance,Higher than the mid-range machine

I forgot to mention ... The KX's CMOS is the same as the D90.

I'm using km, my colleague is using kx, and I feel that kx is still good. The upstairs said that the feel problem does not exist, and it is very comfortable to hold in the hand. You can also record videos, which is great if you want to get started.

Just as no one is perfect, there is no end to the machine.

Every camera has drawbacks.

The K-X is a little smaller and uncomfortable to hold, especially with large hands. But in turn, it is an advantage and easy to carry.

Another disadvantage of the K-X is that the image sensor is CMOS instead of CCD, so the imaging is slightly inferior to that of CCD at low sensitivity (ISO). But the high sense is better than the CCD. In particular, the high sensitivity of the K-X has been greatly improved.

When the single machine is reduced to 3k, K-X has no disadvantages.

The K-X's focus point does not have a red tip.

The K5 has few focus points, a slightly slower focusing speed, and a less extensive lens group than the Nikon.

The four-way key layout is downward, and switching focus points will be uncomfortable for users with large hands.

The after-sales service is not good, there are too few physical stores, it is not easy to buy, and it is not easy to repair.

The biggest disadvantage of the K5 itself is that the focusing performance is weaker than that of Nikon, which is highlighted in the tracking of continuous focusing, the low success rate of continuous capture, and the tendency to go out of focus. That's all. As for what reflector jumping door, pixel chaos door, it is all a case.

Because Pentax's quality management is not as good as that of large manufacturers such as Nikon and Canon, this kind of problem is inevitable.

If you don't consider the richness of the lens, the K5 is really a perfect machine, worthy of that price. You must know that the upgraded version of the K5, the K5II, is only an upgrade to the focusing system.

It is recommended to enter K5+1855WR first, Pentax will release a lot of new lenses in the next 2 years, and next year's 18-85 star head is worth paying attention to.