Someone buys my house for renovation and then rents it out, is it beneficial for the homeowner?

This is, of course, beneficial to your homeowner, because your house you don't say no, don't decorate and rent, and then people take your house, and then renovate and then rent it, what does it matter, does it have any impact on your homeowner, your house has been sold, it is someone's house, how people want to buy, how to decorate, how to do is people's business, this has nothing to do with you.

Someone buys your house and renovates it and then rents it out, which should be the idea of all homeowners, because the renovated house can increase its value, and then the rental owner is beneficial. But if your house has been acquired, this homeowner is not you, FYI.

If someone buys your house, renovates it and then rents it out, then the landlord has an interest, after all, the other party will give you rent, and you can rent out the house to get an income.

Someone buys my house and rents it out after renovation, is it advantageous for the homeowner? This must be profitable for him to do this, because after he buys your house, after renovating it, the rent for rent is relatively expensive.

If the house is still in your own name, it is beneficial to yourself, after all, the house decoration does not require your own money, and it is naturally more expensive than the blank if it is resold and renovated in the later stage.

Don't just let someone else decorate your own house, it will cause trouble.

It was acquired by others, and it has nothing to do with it! Advantageous is also the new owner's!

Someone buys my house, renovates it and then rents it out, the landlord has no loss to you, you are more worry-free, it is still beneficial to you, you can just collect rent.

If you buy your house and then rent it out, it should be a second landlord or a resale business, which is also advantageous.

This is beneficial to the house slave, because his decoration can increase the value of your house, which is beneficial to your house.

If someone buys your house and then renovates it, and then rents it out, then the house is his, and the original owner has no right to interfere.

As long as you sell **higher than what you bought before**, it is actually beneficial to you, but this depends on how you define it.

Someone else has bought your house. What he does with it is his business, and you don't need to worry about it.

Tenants do so.

Although it was renovated by itself.

It doesn't seem to hurt the interests of homeowners.

But after the smash of the hygiene.

Tenants are to be dealt with cleanly.

And not before the renovation.

The house is also habitable.

At least not as it is now.

Because you're going to be forced to renovate.

These are all hurts that tenants bring to homeowners.

Compared with the renovated house, the rental rent of the rough house will be lower, and it is more difficult to rent. After all, most people rent houses for their own use, and when the rent difference is not very large, customers will still choose to decorate the house. However, there will also be some companies that rent rough houses, office offices or use them as warehouses.

The rental of the rough room will generally not have much trouble for future decoration, in order to avoid trouble, it can be clearly written in the lease contract.

There is basically no disadvantage to the rental of a rough house compared to the rental of a renovated house, and it will not have much impact on the future decoration!

There is no disadvantage to renting a blank, it depends on what customer group you rent, and the rent of wine is a little lower, and you have not invested in decoration! ~！

Hello! There is no disadvantage to renting a rough house, and there is no trouble with decoration.

The contract should be a normal decoration contract, and when the final relocation is made, the relocation party will find an appraisal company to evaluate the residual value of the decoration of your hotel.

Will your house be demolished? If not, it's fine, and if so, consult to see if the demolition party will compensate.

There are no rights. If he's not convinced, you can ask him to reinstate the way he was (i.e. to what he was before renting). ）

It costs money for him to demolish the existing renovation and restore it (even if you make a hole, you have to replace it).

This kind of problem is purely unreasonable by "Lili". At the beginning, it was said that only the designer would come up with a plan, but he did not decide on the decoration. However, he wanted to set the company for a while, but he was unwilling to decorate, so the problem came out, he proposed the decoration company, because of the ** problem did not let the company install her, there is no problem here, but the designer who said before came up with a plan, and the designer charged the design fee directly because of one of his ideas and unilaterally breached the contract; It can be seen that his people have rebelled; Other designers have worked hard for her for so long.

She's a bit of a snarky person (at best, detail-oriented). It is recommended that this kind of person can break off the relationship, otherwise it will cause you all kinds of trouble in the future;

If you don't know that you have moved in and bought a house after preservation, there is a huge risk in this house, which is a painful lesson for you and may cause you losses. If you sue the original homeowner, you may win. But it is also impossible to recover the economic damage.

Do a good job of hard decoration of the house, such as water and electricity, and the wall is a wall brick on the wall, so that it is new for a long time, no need to repaint, do not use wooden floors in the room, that is not durable, the door is made of steel and wooden doors, which is economical and cost-effective. You can put some effort into decorating the ceiling, and then the rest is movable furniture. A good rental house gives the tenant the feeling that it is to be clean, the house is new, and the supporting facilities are complete.

The decoration is simple, and the soft decoration is beautiful.

I think it's a big drawback.

First, any model room is based on superficial work, and the house we want to make is a long-term one, and if the interior is not handled well, then it will not be used.

Second, I admit that it is cheap, but I don't believe that the decoration company will have no profit, and no one in the world does anything without profit, let alone business.

Third, the model room should be visited by people, and it will be visited every day or someone will come to see it, which has a considerable impact on life.

Let it be done for you for free, it should be a good deal.

This is also a means for the decoration company to receive orders, in fact, it is not what you imagined: for example, to give you good workers, good materials ==, as a regular company will not change materials casually, there are fixed materials. Therefore, the construction materials and quality will not be used for you just because you are a model house.

Unless it's not a regular company. As for ** on. I can't say if I will press ** high or low for you.

If your** is low. What else are they going to do? I guess the design will be better!

After all, it's for people to see! Hehe.

Yes. It's cheaper, after all, the competition is fierce now, and major decoration companies are engaging in preferential activities, especially for off-plan customers. In addition, my decoration company is also engaged in activities, Jinan, Shandong