PR and AE compare CPU frequency or cores?

Updated on number 2024-04-22
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    To be honest, I eat them all, and I eat memory.

    You don't need to think about that when you buy a 3990x. amd yes

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    PR eats the number of cores, and the multi-core optimization is relatively better than AE, but worse than Da Vinci. If the solid-state memory graphics card does not have a bottleneck, you can eat 6-8 cores, basically 6-8 cores of the CPU are enough, followed by the memory module size 16G guarantee, the core frequency can reach 4G is enough, the software must be installed in the solid state drive, here it is recommended that the solid state drive must be a big name, Samsung, Toshiba, Western Digital, Pucote, etc. SSD memory module size CPU determines the RP experience.

    CPU here recommends AMD, 3700X extremely above, depending on the budget choice.

    AE eats mainly the main frequency, the memory size is higher than the PR requirement, 32G is a little more comfortable, and solid-state is also a must-have. AE optimization is very poor, AE needs to use multiple cores when rendering, but in the case of preview, the main frequency is the mainstay, but the use of AE has more than 9% of the time is actually in the preview (unless you are a set of templates), so if you mainly use AE, Intel's processor is recommended, with 8 cores and more than the main frequency. The recommended processor is 10700k and above.

    If the frequency of use of the two software is about the same, my personal recommendation is 3700x,3900x,3900xt (there is a special enhancement to the editing software on the main frequency,The game is not strong),10700k,10900k,10900kf。

    If you use Da Vinci PR-based,You can go on3950X,The experience will be much better,If you still want to use AE,You have to worry about the frequency of the main frequency,3950X or more CPU is basically the factory that is, ashes,There is no overclocking ability,The main frequency4G is the normal state of use,This frequency is not as good as 8700K when using AE。

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The basic configuration requirements are low, but the efficiency is very slow (it can be used with very low configurations, low efficiency, preview card).

    AE and PR basically belong to how many cores you have, and how strong the graphics card can be eaten for you. (04 version, 16g memory can also be eaten in an instant).

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    A minimum of 16G RAM and a multi-threaded CPU above i7 are required. It's sure to be full, but the rendering will be faster.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    It is often believed that the higher the frequency, the higher the performance of the CPU. Not really. In addition to the external frequency, the factors that determine CPU performance include L2 cache, front-end bus, and core manufacturing process.

    AMD's CPUs were originally numbered with actual external clocks, but since the launch of the Athlon, the performance has also been much higher because its L2 cache is twice as high as that of the earlier Pentium 4. It would obviously be unreasonable to compare the Athlon's XP with the Pentium 4 with the same external frequency. And AMD's CPU has always been inferior to the Pentium 4's, and if it is still numbered by the actual external frequency, it will make people feel that AMD is inferior.

    So AMD came up with a PR value to represent its actual performance, which can be understood as the performance of the Pentium 4 equivalent to this number.

    AMD also came up with a so-called wheel theory for this RP value. It compares the performance of the CPU to the speed of a car, and the external frequency of the CPU to the speed of the wheels. It says that a car with a high wheel speed may not go as fast as a car with a large wheel diameter and a lower rotational speed.

    The calculation of this PR value is more complicated, and the calculation method will be different due to different cores, so the gap between the actual external frequency and the PR value of the newer and more advanced CPU will be. This proves once again that the performance of the CPU cannot be based on the external frequency alone.

    For example, the performance of the AMD Athlon XP 1800+ is comparable to that of Intel's Pentium 4.

Related questions
Playing games, does the CPU pursue high clock speed or dual-core?
17 answers2024-04-22

Definitely 5200 is the best, the winner of the "ZOL 2008 Best Product of the Year Award" is now **cheap, and the main frequency of 2500 is also quite good! Different models, different processes, not just look at the high frequency, his speed is fast. >>>More

Help to see if the CPU is single-core or dual-core
12 answers2024-04-22

Single-core. There are also many 3D games, some that require high configuration, some that do not require high, some that require high CPU, and some that do not require high CPU. It also depends on the memory and graphics card. It's no problem to run some undemanding 3D games.

Pure gaming, is it better to use dual core or 4 cores for CPU?
11 answers2024-04-22

At present, the mainstream game dual-core is enough.

Quad-cores are still expensive. It is recommended that the landlord buy a good graphics card. CPU dual cores are sufficient. >>>More

Is CrossFire eating CPU or graphics card?
9 answers2024-04-22

Friend,At present, the frequency of the display is only 60,You have exceeded it,Generally, more than 40 is smooth,More than 80 is very smooth。 If you still feel that it is stuck, it may be a problem with the hard disk, and the frame rate is not only determined by the graphics card, but also by the CPU to achieve such a high level. >>>More

Is it better to take folic acid in the morning or at night?
9 answers2024-04-22

There is no clear rule on the time to take folic acid, whether it is taken at night or in the morning, but you should try to take it at a fixed time every day to ensure that the concentration of folic acid in the body is moderate. >>>More