Is the Emperor of the Ages? What was the king like in history?

Of course not. First of all, there was no title of "emperor" during the Shang Dynasty. So it is definitely not possible to talk about "an emperor through the ages".

Secondly, what we call "an emperor through the ages" generally refers specifically to Qin Shi Huang. Because he completed the unification of China for the first time, he was also the first monarch in Chinese history to be called emperor. Qin Shi Huang created and implemented a variety of imperial systems in one fell swoop laid the basic pattern of China's political system for more than 2,000 years, so it was praised as "the first emperor of the ages" by the Ming Dynasty thinker Li Zhen, and since then "the first emperor of the ages" refers to Qin Shi Huang.

No, there was indeed no emperor at that time, and they were all kings. The emperor started with Qin Shi Huang, and the first emperor through the ages is actually the exclusive title of Qin Shi Huang, just like the alien on the football field is the title of Ronaldo, and the African Andy Lau is the title of Drogba.

King Su was not the first emperor of the ancient world, he did a lot of evil during his lifetime, and the people were punished, which did not promote the development of history, but some systems regressed.

No, the king of Shang is very average, and there is a lot of negative news, I hope he can change his life, and thank God for being an average.

The king should not be counted, and the first emperor of the ages should be Qin Shi Huang.

The first emperor in the history of our country refers to Qin Shi Huang or Han Gaozu, and King Su is just a tyrant, he is not counted.

This king is not considered to be the first emperor of the ages, and he is the next section of Wang Sisi's Shang Dynasty. Looks like you're beating me. But he seems to be a faint king, in fact, it is not necessarily in history.

It can be counted, because there are many errors in the records of him in the literature of later generations, in fact, he is very powerful.

No. King Su was a famous tyrant in history, who favored Daji and brutalized Zhongliang, and was later destroyed by King Wu of Zhou.

I don't think it's an emperor through the ages, because no emperor can say that he is an emperor through the ages? Only Qin Shi Huang can say that he is the first emperor of the ages.

The emperor refers to the emperor, he is not counted, at most he is a great lord.

In fact, although the king was brutal, some of his reforms were moving towards feudal society, and in addition, he opened up and expanded his territory, which only affected the majority of the slave-owning ruling class.

King Su (1105-1046 BC), the surname of the son, the name of Shou or Shoude or Xin, also called "Di Xin". The thirty-second emperor of the Shang Dynasty, Di Xin reigned for 30 years, and was later known as the King of Shang.

According to the official history, the king of Shang was well-informed, quick-witted, tall, and powerful. After succeeding to the throne, he attached importance to agriculture and mulberry, the development of social productive forces, and the strength of the country. He continued to initiate the use of troops against Dongyi, repelled Dongyi's expansion into the Central Plains, and expanded the Shang Dynasty's influence to the Jianghuai region.

In particular, the victory of the crusade against Xu Yi expanded the territory of the Shang Dynasty to the coastal areas of Shandong, Anhui, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Fujian, expanded the territory to the southeast of China, and developed the Yangtze River Valley. He laid the material and ideological foundation for the final unification of ancient China, and was the pioneer of the unification of ancient China.

The King of the Rings"It is not an official emperor title, but a vicious slander imposed on his head by later generations, which means"Broken and bad"。His correct name should be the last monarch of the Shang Dynasty, the young son of Emperor Yi, the surname of the child, the name of Shou (Yi Zuo Shoude), the world name "纣", "Shang Dynasty King", generally called Di Xin.

During the reign of Emperor Xin, he repeatedly sent troops to attack the Dongyi tribes in the construction of court songs, increased the collection of gifts, strictly enforced the weekly sacrifice system, changed the employment policy, and implemented strict punishment laws.

His various measures not only caused contradictions in the ruling group, but also shook the foundation of the Shang Dynasty's rule. In the Battle of Muye, the Shang army was defeated by the coalition of princes led by King Wu of Zhou, Di Xin died, and the Shang Dynasty perished.

In the traditional historiographical narrative, Di Xin indulged in wine, reckless military force, heavy punishment, and refused to admonish and disguise wrongdoing, and was a typical tyrant who was called "Ji Xuan" together with Xia Wei, and eventually caused the people to rebel and leave their relatives, die and destroy the country. Later generations have disputed this.

Hello, to correct it, King Shang has never been an emperor, the answer is zero, he has only been a king for 29 years. The title of emperor came after Qin Shi Huang.

The reign is set at 1075 BC to 1046 BC. 29 years.

30 years.

The Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties project set the reign of Emperor Xin from 1075 BC to 1046 BC.

1 Count it all. The Zhou Dynasty is a dynasty with far-reaching influence in Chinese history, and its ceremonial system has become the fundamental system that guides the foundation of Chinese life for 2,000 years, and its dynasty is also the longest-lived dynasty in Chinese history, and the sub-feudal system it created has laid a solid foundation for China to establish a unified ** dynasty.

The first emperor of the ages originally refers to the leader who has made outstanding contributions to the Chinese nation, and there is no need to worry too much about whether he is a king or an emperor or something else. If you really want to be entangled in the word emperor, there are only five emperors in Chinese history, they are the Yellow Emperor, Zhuan, Emperor Yu, Yao, Shun, and most of the others are emperors.

As for the question upstairs asking why Qin Shi Huang was the first emperor, this is a question of title, before Qin Shi Huang, the supreme ruler of the country was the king, and below were the titles of duke, prince, uncle, and baron. Most of the princes, in fact, only have marquis, special such as Chu, and their titles are the lowest barons. But in the later period, the princes competed to be the prince, and by the beginning of the Warring States period, they were all like the Chu State, claiming the king.

After the unification of Qin, the title of king has long been used badly, Qin Shi Huang set a new title for himself, the name of the three emperors and five emperors, and called the queen emperor, so Qin Shi Huang is the first emperor in Chinese history.

is a character, after all, the product of the change of celestial phenomena can only be said to be a virtuous king.

King Wu of Zhou was a king, not an emperor.

Calculate. 1.The evaluation of "One Emperor through the Ages" depends on whether it has promoted the development of the Chinese nation, and cannot only stand from the perspective of the Zhou Dynasty. The Chinese nation has been up and down for 5,000 years, and King Wu of Zhou is regarded as an emperor through the ages.

2.Even from the perspective of Zhou, before King Wu of Zhou established the Zhou Dynasty, there was already this country. King Wu of Zhou was not the second emperor.

It is said that Qin Shi Huang was the first emperor, I am a little strange, what about the Zhou Dynasty and Xia before this, it is also this country, is the head of state the emperor? Or is it because there is no record in the canonical history?

An emperor through the ages, first of all, an emperor, there was no emperor before Emperor Qin, how to evaluate an emperor through the ages!

Besides, the first emperor of the ages has never counted the time of a certain dynasty, if it is so calculated that the dynasties of the Qin Emperor, Han Wu, Tang Dynasty and Song Ancestors do not have a thousand years, if you want to say that China does not have a thousand years of dynasties. The term "eternal" means that his influence can be passed down for thousands of years.