There is no remainder in the vertical calculation, should I add zero?

Updated on technology 2024-04-29
17 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    There is no remainder when the column is calculated vertically, so you must add a 0 here, but you just add a 0 when you calculate vertically, and you can not write it on paper.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    For example, 100 25 is calculated vertically.

    Problem solving idea: divide each digit of the dividend (from the high position) by the divisor operation, the quotient obtained from each calculation is retained, the remainder + the next digit is calculated, and the divisor is calculated in this order, and the quotient obtained is combined in order, and the remainder is the result of the last operation.

    Problem solving: Step 1: 100 25=4

    The result is: 4

    The result is 4 and you don't need to add 0

    If you have any doubts, please ask and be satisfied.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If there is no remainder in the column vertical type, there is no need to write 6 points and then write a 0 after it, which is a bit redundant. Because what you calculate is an integer, in that case, there is no need to write a judgment with a remainder later, which is a bit of a snake to add to it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hello! Those who can't be quick are to be.

    Solution: Division is calculated vertically, if the dividend is taken.

    and the divisor by removing a 0 (i.e., shrinking by 10 times at the same time), the remainder.

    It is also 10 times smaller.

    Because the dividend of the mu of the potato divisor = quotient + remainder, so when the dividend and the divisor are reduced by the same multiple at the same time, the quotient remains unchanged, and the remainder is reduced by the same multiple as the divisor and the dividend.

    Relevant knowledge. There is a remainder of the division, the law of the quotient is unchanged, reduced by ten times, the vertical unit is zero, can it be left?

    For example, Zheng Hall calculates 1250 20, and when calculating vertically, the dividend and divisor are reduced to the original 1 10, that is, the calculation.

    125÷2=62……1. The original equation should be written as:

    1250 ÷20=62……10, the vertical remainder multiplied by 10 is the remainder of the original formula.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    97÷4=。There is no stove oak smile is more than a loss.

    Implied. <>

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In order for this calculation problem to have no remainders, it must have decimals. If you want an integer, you have to have a remainder.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The vertical calculation of 97 4 is shown in the figure below.

    97 4 is inexhaustible, and there will be a remainder in everything you do.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    97÷4=

    11114) 97811.

    111 108 11.

    2020-1-0

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Haha, there must be a remainder in this question, unless you miscalculate or change the question.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Yes, there is no remainder for 39 6 vertical calculations. Look at the vertical view:

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The remainder is added to 0.

    Here's an example: 310 20 = 15 ......10。

    In vertical calculation, the divisor and the dividend are divided by a zero at the same time, and the post-division formula is 31 2 = 15......1, from which it can be concluded that the remainder in the vertical formula is plus zero. 1 plus 0 equals 10.

    So 310 20 = 15 ......10 instead of 310 20 = 15 ......1。

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Add 0 because the remainder is the remainder in the ten place, and the number in the ten place indicates several tens.

    In general, remove a zero at the same time, only 0 is removed if it is divisible, and zero is not removed if it is not divisible.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The dividend and the divisor have zeros at the end and have a remainder are calculated in the same way as those without zeros, such as:

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    In the vertical calculation of the division where the dividend and the divisor have 0, the zeros of the same number of digits can be removed at the same time, which is an operation method that uses the quotient of the same multiple to expand or decrease the same multiple of the dividend and the divisor at the same time. For example, 96 16 = 6, while expanding 10 times 960 60 = 6, and shrinking 4 times 24 4 = 6.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    You don't need to cross out the 0 at the end, just divide it directly, and there are zeros at the end, which does not affect the calculation.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    In addition to the endless, the closed key shoots this bright sun vertical direct sedan envy and calculates the remainder.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Answer: 92 3 vertical juice does not write zero before the remainder 2. 92 3 , Liebo Ming Cave Base Dry Vertical Calculation:

    Huaiyou.

Related questions
16 answers2024-04-29

<> this problem is the division with remainders, when the quotient is to pay attention to the number to align, the remainder should be less than the divisor, the last step, because it is not enough to subtract the 3 directly save down, in the ** to use 0 placeholder, when checking the quotient x divisor + remainder = dividend to check. >>>More

12 answers2024-04-29

As. Explanation, first of all, vertical calculation, must be aligned with single digits, ten digits, and hundreds of digits, and then start from single digits, and calculate from back to front.

13 answers2024-04-29

The vertical calculation of is shown in the figure below:

So, >>>More

15 answers2024-04-29

Hello! , the addition vertical operation is shown in the figure below.

16 answers2024-04-29

4 yuan 5 jiao = yuan, so 6 yuan yuan is calculated vertically. >>>More