The construction of national and provincial expressways, by which level of approval, what are the pr

In most countries, the construction of high-speed or provincial highways is approved at the **level**, and the specific procedures and funding may vary from country to country. Here are some of the usual approval procedures and funding**::

1.Approval process: The construction of high-speed or provincial expressways usually requires national or local** approval.

In some countries, the construction of high-speed or provincial highways is also subject to procedures such as environmental assessment and land use permits. The specific approval process may vary from country to country, so it is recommended that you check with your country's transportation department or relevant authorities for more accurate information.

These funds may come from a variety of sources, such as fiscal grants, private investments, bank loans, etc. Exact funding** may vary from country to country, so it is recommended that you check with your country's transport department or relevant agency for more accurate information.

The national highway network and ordinary national highway network projects shall be approved by the provincial level in accordance with the relevant plans approved by the state, and the local highway projects shall be approved by the provincial level. The specific procedures need to consult the development and reform departments and transportation departments of the relevant provinces. The funds can be ** capital contribution (** toll project), or enterprise capital contribution (operating road), or both parties together (PPP project, etc.).

Brother, are you full? Why do you care about this?

<> policy is higher than the law - building highways is a national project and does not require land acquisition approval?

According to the second paragraph of Article 44 of the Land Management Law: The roads, pipeline projects and large-scale infrastructure construction projects approved by the people of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government, and the land occupied by the construction projects approved by the people, involving the conversion of agricultural land into construction land, shall be approved by the people. Article 45 stipulates that the expropriation of collective land for project construction requires the approval of land acquisition made by the first or the first provincial, and the approval of the conversion of agricultural land into construction land is also required if agricultural land is involved.

Therefore, even if the state builds a highway, it is necessary to have a land acquisition approval, and the argument of ** is obviously illegal.

Why is this so? This phenomenon is more common in the process of land acquisition and demolition, and it takes a certain amount of time for land acquisition to be approved. In the mouth of the ** department in some places, the policy seems to be higher than the law and above all else, and once the work encounters obstacles, the policy will be used to block the public's mouth.

This is just a routine of the expropriator, don't be fooled!

Land requisition and demolition work is no exception, the expropriated person does not sign the compensation agreement, the expropriator says that this is the policy of the superiors, no one has the power to change, if the relevant regulations are violated, everyone must be liable. It is impossible to change the compensation standard for a household, otherwise the expropriated person who signed the agreement before will definitely be dissatisfied, and the compensation work in the future will not be easy to carry out.

Once you ask who made these policies? Is it in accordance with national legal procedures? The expropriator will also give you the hat of not supporting the ** work, so that the expropriated person is overwhelmed.

However, in fact, the policy in the mouth of the expropriator sometimes does not exist, the truth and falsehood all depend on the mouth of the expropriator, sometimes the so-called policy even if it exists, it is illegal and does not comply with national laws and regulations, and the expropriated person has the right to raise questions, not like the expropriator has nothing to do.

Therefore, the "policy is so" in the mouth of the expropriator is often just a routine of the expropriator, and it is a means of eviction, the purpose of which is to make the expropriated person believe that this is the best decision, and the expropriated person cannot change it, and there is no other way than to accept it.