Geforce 210 and Geforce 5700 are better than which

The G210 is roughly equivalent to the GeForce 9300GT, which is naturally 210 good .

Dragon Nest games require a minimum configuration.

CPU: PentiumIII and above.

RAM: 512MB or more.

Graphics: GeForce 5700 or higher.

Radeon 9550 and above).

Recommended. CPU: Intel Core or above.

RAM: 1GB or more.

Graphics: GeForce 6600 or higher.

Radeon X1300 and above).

So your configuration can play Dragon Nest.

Two cards are not a thing of the same era! Who told you that these two cards can be compared? But both cards are not good cards GeForce 5700 is a 2005 card G210 is a new card good But it's the lowest-end card If you play Dragon Nest, let's change it both cards are not good.

The 2 comparisons are of course 210 well, he is relative to the geforce 9600. Enough is enough to play the current out-of-the-box game.

GF210 bits wide and 64 bits

GF5700 is a very early card.

80 Tao 7600gt

Either spend a little more money to buy ATI3870 or 4850 remember, you have to buy **!

To be honest, both graphics cards are poor, but the GeForce 5700 is something from 6 or 7 years ago, and the GeForce 210 is better in terms of performance.

The interface is not the same.

210 strong.

Although the performance of G210M is a cripple among mainstream mobile graphics cards, it is still several times more powerful than the 5700 five or six years ago.

There is no comparison at all, and the G210M beats the GF5700 by a beat. After all, it's not a product of the same era, and the gap is too big

It's like now, just take a copycat phone and compare it with Big Brother Big Brother is defeated except for the big @ others

The 5700 was the high end of n years ago, and the 210 is the low end of now.

For now, it should be 210 good.

Although it is said that 210 is a garbage card, it is also more powerful than an old antique like 5700.

The G210 is roughly equivalent to the GeForce 9300GT

210 good, of course.

Wujia looks like a 250, no matter from the parameters or **, 5700 is higher than 210, understand???

1. Comparison of the technical specifications of the two graphics cards:

GF210 graphics card, core code GT218, 40nm process, 16 stream processors, video memory DDR2 bit width 64bit, capacity 256 512 1024MB, core frequency memory frequency = 589 1600 MHz, bandwidth 8GB s, interface PCI-E X16. Support 2K resolution, maximum power consumption 30W;

9500GT, core code G96, 65nm process, 32 stream processors, core frequency 550MHz. Video memory DDR2 DDR3 bit width 128bit, video memory frequency 800 (GDDR3) 500 (DDR2) MHz, capacity configuration 512 MB (GDDR3) 512 MB (DDR2), bandwidth, interface PCI-E X16, graphics card maximum power consumption 50W;

2. From the comparison of parameters, it can be seen that the GF210 process is more advanced than the 9500GT, which is a 40nm process, but the SP of the latter is twice as much as the former, with 32. And the latter video memory bit width is 128 bits, and the bandwidth of DDR3 version video memory is 3 times that of GF210. The performance of the older 9500GT is higher than that of the GF210;

4. The performance of these two old-time-level independent graphics cards has fallen below the CPU core display, and with the power consumption, volume, and performance ratio, they have no practical value and are eliminated. However, these low-cost dismantling products of twenty or thirty yuan can still be used as teaching models and experimental equipment for beginners.

GeForce GT210 is a GeForce 9400GT (*) with 40nm process, the earliest name is GeForce 8500GT, which is equivalent to the GeForce GT100 (vest card) in OEM mouths. GeForce 9500GT is an 8600GT made by a new process, with 32 stream processor units like the former, and the core Shader video memory frequency is 550 1400 1600 MHz, There are two kinds of manufacturing processes: 55nm and 65nm, so you should pay attention to it when purchasing. (The 9400 GT is positioned for the entry-level market, replacing the previous generation 8500 GT and 8400 GS, with the same 55nm G96B core (number G96-200-C1) as the 9500 GT, but with a streamlined specs:

While the core clock remains the same at 550MHz and the bit width remains at 128-bit, the stream processors are halved to 16 and the frequency is slightly reduced to 1350MHz, while the video memory is only 400MHz GDDR2, thus losing half of the bandwidth. It is foreseeable that the performance of the 9400 GT will be about half that of the 9500 GT. In summary:

GeForce 9500GT good.

In a way, the 210GT is not as good as the 8500GT. Don't be fooled. If you don't have enough budget to buy a 9600gso, the performance has been improved by 1 times.

The G210 is about the same as the 8500. There is no essential improvement at all, at least choose GT240 or above, there will be a qualitative improvement

The 9600GSO requires a 300W rated power supply to support it

The G105 is good, the FX5700 is all 04 years old. But G105 is not even a garbage in the current graphics card,FX5700 is also a remnant of the last era,There are parameters on the Internet,You can find it yourself G105 is generally only used in notebooks,And G300After it comes out, it is an outdated product,This thing is not good, it is to light up the machine and watch a movie FX5700 is the first generation of DX9 card,Although positioned in the high-end,But it is not comparable with the current low-end,In all aspects,Performance and power consumption are not good Don't believe the upstairs.

Do you refer to the latest ATI HD5700 series or the previous FX5700 graphics card If it is the latest 5700, then it is not at all a level G105 is the predecessor of G210, G210 is the predecessor of G310, entry-level water products 3DMark 06 is also 2600 However, G310 has 3600 5700 series is the high-end graphics card in ATI. The performance is better than the 5650 5700 has not been used The 5650's 3DMark06 has 7000+