Nikon S550 or S210, or S200, which one is better

None of these are good.

Or the S510 is the most cost-effective.

As long as the focus is accurate, and the hands are not shaking, they will not be mushy.

The S510 is optical image stabilization, and none of the ones you are talking about.

Of course, optical image stabilization is better than electronic image stabilization.

All three are bad. Although the S210 and S550 are new, both of them are electronic image stabilization, and the image stabilization effect is not as good as optical image stabilization. You can consider the S510, the S510 is very cost-effective and can meet the needs of the general household.

The S600 is also good and fully functional.

<> according to the comparison of the two cameras, the cost performance of the remaining manuscript should be S3200, with high pixel ratio and longer lens focal length, which is suitable for different environmental scenes.

Any household consumer-grade camera, you don't need to look at its argument and burn configuration, if it is not even suitable for the minimum requirements of taking a landscape, there is no need to make it at all.

Both cameras are relatively good brands, and the quality of the camera mainly depends on the number of manual functions it has.

Let's start with the ixus105, S3100, and S5100. ixus105 is a domestic machine, 1210 pixels support washing**20 inches or so, 1600 ISO sensitivity night photography effect is average, aperture and shutter do not support too special photo environment, 28mm wide angle. Production.

The S3100 is an upgraded version of the S3000, with normal camera functions, similar to the performance of the IXUS105, but at a lower price. The S5100 does not have much of a practical gap with it. Nikon has a direct charge of 2 batteries and does not have a seat charger.

After saying ixus220 and s6000. The ixus220 is a new machine with a stylish appearance and functions that are suitable for home use, but because it has just been launched, it is original in Japan, and the price is a little higher. S6000 looks average, the screen display is average, but the function is similar to ixus220, and the result after taking pictures is basically the same.

It seems that the ixus220 is a 24mm wide angle, and the photo surface is wider.

If you're just using them for home, these cameras are good, just set a price point, choose a big brand (Canon, Nikon, Sony, Samsung, Panasonic), and choose a look. Don't ask for a camera with too many tricks, which will affect the quality of the photo.

It is recommended that you still use Canon's IXUS220HS. This one comes with an HS system and has low noise. 24 wide angles. And it's not very expensive, and the softness of the light is very good.

The Canon ixus220 HS is still a little better, better in terms of performance, and better value for money.

The Panasonic FH3GK and Nikon S5100 have similar performance, and I was selected between the two cameras at the time, and I chose the Nikon S5100. If Nikon is discontinued now, choose Panasonic, ** It's about the same.

In fact, I personally think that if it's a home use, it's S2500.,That's what I use.。 Anyway, I don't know much about it, and I don't need to be too demanding at home. Personally, I don't think it's as bad as on the Internet.

If you buy it in a physical store, 2500 is a lot cheaper than 3100 ......The choice is yours ......

There is no optical image stabilization (if you are not a pure household) The shutter button design is not good S3100 is better than S2500 Wait for Nikon to come out again ** Take a look (It is recommended to buy S3100 is better than buy ixus Hello color).

Canon ixus105 water is only about 1,000 yuan.

S2500 and S3100 S310 is relatively good, in fact, there is no big difference between general pats, it's better to buy a cheaper one.