What are the 8 sorrows behind the retaliation for reporting?

First, there is the sorrow of the whistleblower. The reason why whistleblowers report is because they feel unfair, and it is for a kind of social responsibility, however, their kindness is not cared for and comforted, which will inevitably make the whistleblower feel sad. The whistleblower mourns, and the ugly rejoices; If ugly elements rejoice, it will be difficult to establish a clean and fair atmosphere in officialdom.

The second is the sorrow of righteousness. To report ugliness is to be upright and upright, and the whistleblower is retaliated against, and 90% of them are retaliated against, which is actually revenge on righteousness, which is the great sorrow of righteousness. Righteousness is great sorrow, and evil is bound to run rampant.

Third, there is the sorrow of the overseer. Whistleblowing is also a kind of supervision, but now that supervision is encountering retaliation, it will inevitably greatly reduce the enthusiasm of supervision, weaken the enthusiasm of supervision, and inevitably lead to the weakening of the entire supervisory force.

Fourth, it is the sorrow of the law. Supposedly, we should have a law specifically protecting whistleblowers, but after so many years of discussion, there has not been, resulting in frequent incidents of retaliation against whistleblowers, which is the sadness of legal work. The law is to uphold righteousness, and it is sad that there are still such big loopholes.

Fifth, it is the sorrow of the fight against corruption. Whistleblowing is a sharp weapon against corruption, but now this sharp weapon has been hit by 90%, so it is really difficult to sharpen such a sharp weapon, and the anti-corruption work is a big loss.

Sixth, it is the sorrow of the system. There are many letterheads reported by whistleblowers who often return to the hands of the reported, which is a kind of sadness of the system, which is a fool of citizens' reports, and such a system is sad.

Seventh, it is the sorrow of honest work. The formation of a clean atmosphere inevitably requires a strong force for citizens to report, but now, it is so difficult for citizens to report, and it is inevitable that they will not take care of it, and it is difficult to form a clean atmosphere.

Eighth, it is the sorrow of power. Power is given by the people, and the people are retaliated against for supervising and reporting power, which is the sorrow of power, because such power is ungrateful to the people.

Hope you can, thanks!

Because some of the whistleblower's information should have been kept confidential, but it was leaked.

Because you report this person, another person with a problem will panic, so they will deliberately release news to provoke.

Because even if the reported person and his family have unjust gains, they feel that they should take it for granted, and they feel that no one should be able to challenge his position.

Because people are selfish, good and evil are instantaneous, and not everyone has a conscience, but many people use various reasons to cover up the fact that they have no conscience.

Because the ancestors said that if they see through it or not, people will fight for a breath. Most people will not report it easily, and if they report it with their real name, they must be unbearable or challenge the bottom line of others, even if the whistleblower knows that his life is in danger, he must let the matter be announced to the world.

Because the reported person still believes in the law and abides by the regulations, it is estimated that if he does not believe it, he will directly find an opportunity to knock out the person.

Because society is very simple, it is people who are complicated.

Because of your report, let him be punished, he hates you, so he takes revenge.

Legal analysis: There is no crime of retaliation in China's laws, but retaliation against witnesses is strictly prohibited in China, and in accordance with regulations, those who retaliate against witnesses may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment may be given.

Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 254:Where employees of state organs abuse their authority or falsely seek personal gain, and retaliate against accusers, complainants, critics, or informants, they are to be sentenced to up to two years imprisonment or short-term detention; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between two and seven years imprisonment.

Article 308:Whoever retaliates against a witness shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment. Article 308-1: Where judicial personnel, defenders, litigants, or other litigation participants leak information that should not be disclosed in a case that is not tried in public in accordance with law, causing the public dissemination of information or other serious consequences, they are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release, and/or a fine. Where conduct in the preceding paragraph is leaked to state secrets, it is to be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of article 398 of this Law.

Where the circumstances are serious, publicly disclose or report case information provided for in the first paragraph, punishment is to be given in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph. Where a unit commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, the unit is to be fined, and the directly responsible managers and other directly responsible personnel are to be punished in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph.

If the whistleblower suffers damage to his reputation or economy as a result of retaliation, he may file a lawsuit with the court to demand compensation. Where the retaliator's conduct is suspected of constituting a crime, criminal responsibility may be pursued in accordance with law.

Legal basis: "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 254: Where a staff member of a state organ abuses his power or falsely seeks public benefit, and retaliates against an accuser, complainant, critic, or informant, he is to be sentenced to up to two years imprisonment or short-term detention; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between two and seven years imprisonment.

Legal basis: "Provisions on Procedures for the Handling of Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs" Article 158: Public security organs shall ensure the safety of persons who have been transferred, informants, accusers, informants, and their close relatives. If the person who turned it in, reported the case, made the accusation, or reported it is unwilling to disclose his name or the conduct of the person who turned it in, reported the case, made the accusation, or made the report, he shall keep it confidential.

Several Provisions on the Protection and Reward of Informants of Crimes Abusing Public Office》 Article 6: After people's procuratorates accept real-name reports, they shall, in accordance with relevant provisions, conduct a comprehensive assessment of the risks that may occur, as well as their nature, extent, and impact, draft risk levels, and draft informant protection plans based on the identified risk levels. In the course of handling a case, the people's procuratorate shall promptly adjust the risk level based on changes in the actual situation.