Preventing a man from moving into a new property and suddenly dying in a conflict, under what circum

Long-term physical sub-health, or long-term history of smoking, alcoholism, adverse lifestyle habits that affect physical health, mental stress that cannot be relieved, etc., will cause sudden death.

One is the physical cause, including heart disease, hypertension, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular and other hidden diseases that can easily lead to sudden death, which are triggered by fierce quarrels or physical conflicts, resulting in death; The other is sudden traumatic death caused by an accident such as a temple, head, and chest cavity caused by an accident during a collision or falling to the ground during the conflict.

I think it's easy for people to have such accidents when they are very emotional, or when they encounter something that makes them angry, or something urgent, or if they have a disease earlier.

Generally, in some civil disputes, when there is a very emotional situation, such accidents often occur.

For example, people with congenital diseases of the brain or heart may have this kind of accident if they are emotionally agitated and have no way to control their rising emotions.

For example, if you are overworked, or you are emotional, it may also be related to the person suffering from heart disease, and it may also be that the other person is pushing and shoving, and the other party is more forceful, so it causes the other person's sudden death.

This incident is a real incident that happened in Fujian recently, and the man who died suddenly was in his 50s. I believe that such a result is something that no one wants to see. The specific cause of the sudden death is still under investigation, but I think that since it has happened, we should learn from this incident, and I think that these people should be responsible for such a thing?

First of all, I think it's the man himself. Secondly, there is the man's family.

1. The man himself.

Human life is only once, and the skin of a person is the parent of the person. We must cherish life, cherish our bodies, and as adults, we are responsible for our own death, especially in such conflicting events. Some people say that a person who doesn't love himself will definitely not be able to love others.

Only we know ourselves best, we must first have a clear understanding of our physical condition, and then we must be responsible for our words and deeds. There are also reports on the Internet that he sat next to the green belt and did not participate in the sudden death. However, I personally think that he was either involved, even if he was not involved in action, but also emotionally, because of the sudden death caused by emotional agitation.

If you have some physical diseases, then you should not go to see the excitement in such a situation, and you should know that you should take the initiative to avoid these unexpected events, which are easy to cause accidents.

Second, the man's family.

If he had died suddenly without a conflict, he must have had some physical ailments. The family of this man in his 50s is very aware of his physical condition, so in his usual conversation, the man in his 50s should be allowed to understand some basic common sense and know where to go and where not to go. What can and can't be involved.

Who else do you think is responsible for the man's sudden death? How about the property company in your own community? Do you think the strata company is liable?

Property staff. Because the man would not have died in the conflict if there had not been a property staff to move in, it should be the property staff who should be responsible.

The man should bear part of the responsibility, should not block the new property, and if the man is attacked by force in the conflict, the other party should also bear part of the responsibility.

Property. Because the man died suddenly while preventing the new property from moving in, and the violent words during the conflict, the man was emotional and died suddenly, which is inseparable from the property.

I think the new property has a certain amount of responsibility, but relatively speaking, it is not large, and the main responsibility is the reason why the man himself has such a behavior that causes so much harm to himself.

I feel that the property should be responsible. Because the man's sudden death is because the new property is to be occupied, the root cause lies in the property, so the property is responsible.

Because today's young people like to stay up late, stay up late to play with their mobile phones, and their bodies can't get a good rest, so it's like a time bomb, maybe one day the body can't bear the load and dies suddenly.

Because of poor health. Young people often stay up late to eat irregularly, have irregular work and rest, and then their health is very poor, and the probability of sudden death is also high.

I think it's because young people nowadays work too hard and don't care about their bodies at all.

The cause of Hello's sudden death was that the owner himself had a heart condition and was overly agitated after a conflict with the property. Caused a heart attack**, resulting in sudden death.

There was a violent conflict between the owner and the property, and in the course of the conflict, there was a risk that the man would become emotional, causing physical discomfort and leading to sudden death.

Heart disease. Due to the conflict between the owner of the community and the property personnel, he died while sitting on the edge of the green belt in a state of emotion.

Because there is a head-on conflict after the property is blocked by many people, resulting in the owner being too emotional and suddenly dying, the property must be responsible, and nothing should be in front of the customer, things need to be calm to solve, and violence will only backfire.

The reason for the man's sudden death was that the property and the owner of the community had a conflict with the owner of the community during the process of handing over the old and new properties in the community, and the envy of the brother Brother Tangerine led to the man's sudden death.

Because the scene was particularly chaotic at that time, and even a big fight, because the man was in his 50s, he was also very excited at the time, and finally led to sudden death on the spot.

The man in black prevented the new property from moving in to them, so that such a situation would occur, and after such a situation, he also called 120 to save the man in time, and after the hospital investigation, the fight was too intense, resulting in the sudden death of the man due to some diseases.

It's due to the men themselves. After inspection and analysis, the man should have been caused by staying up late and overwork, which had nothing to do with the new property.

The property company should also correct its own service attitude, after all, for the owners of the community, only in-depth communication with the owners, in order to manage the community, to promote the company's service key to the water Pai Dan peace and development. As a property owner, you should also support the work of the property more, don't be impulsive, life is precious.

I believe that the man who died suddenly should be held responsible, because the man did not have physical contact with anyone before his sudden death, and he only watched the scene when he appeared, and the man's sudden death was most likely due to his own illness, and the rest of the people should not be held responsible. The old property in this community is very irresponsible in the eyes of the community owners, even the most basic cleaning is not good, and the community owners also think that the number of security guards hired by the old property is too small, and five or six security guards cannot guarantee the safety of the entire community at all.

Therefore, the owners of the community collectively fired the old property and found a new property when the contract with the old property did not expire. On December 21, the new property was ready to settle in the community, but suddenly many people wearing black clothes appeared to prevent the new property from entering the community. The owners of the community had a conflict with these men in black, but one of the owners who was watching from the side suddenly fell to the ground, and no one beat him or insulted him before he fell to the ground.

After the man fell to the ground, someone at the scene immediately dialed 120, but the man still died because of ineffective rescue.

The old property also issued a statement saying that the man's fall had nothing to do with him, but did not explain whether the black-clad security guards were hired by them. Conflicts between property owners and property owners appear in many communities, and many times it is due to the inaction of the property. In this case, I believe that the owner of the community has the right to fire the property, so I also support the practice of the owner of this community.

If the property owner is dissatisfied with the behavior of the owner of the community to fire him, it is also recommended not to use coercive or violent means, and can go through legal procedures to require the owner to pay liquidated damages. But this man's death really has nothing to do with the old property, regardless of whether the old property hired black-clothed security guards or not, whether their behavior was inappropriate, they can't be blamed for this matter. It is also recommended that the elderly should pay more attention to the maintenance of their bodies, do not get together to see everything, and it is best to do a physical examination once every six months.

First of all, several men in black have acted so aggressively that they have caused conflict, and they are primarily responsible. There are also problems with the handling of the new property, otherwise the two sides will not quarrel and conflict, and if there is a conflict, the two sides should sit down and talk about it. Secondly, if a man dies suddenly, it should be ascertained whether he has a sudden myocardial infarction or other sudden sudden death disease, and the deceased himself dies suddenly, and the man in black and the property bear half of the responsibility.

The property security guard is responsible for this, and according to the new civil law, the perpetrator of the violence is primarily responsible, because the property security guard is responsible for assaulting the man.

I think the property management company should be responsible for this matter, because there is indeed something unreasonable in their behavior.

The boss behind the many men in black is in charge, and if it weren't for the men in black who came to make trouble, he wouldn't have let the man die suddenly.