What are some interesting contradictions between liberal arts and science students that are difficul

Between liberal arts students and science students, I feel that our brain circuits and ideas are also different. As far as I'm a liberal arts student, I usually watch movies with more emotion, but science students are different, he can reason about the plot of the story. It makes me feel like they're just wood.

There will be a big difference in the perspective of thinking between liberal arts students and science students. My current major, business administration, is accepted by liberal arts and physiology students, but it is a separate class, mathematics will be much simpler, and the requirements of computer technology will be relatively simple, but they will read a lot. Liberal arts and physiology students are indispensable.

The two ways of thinking can complement each other, not to say that there are particularly conflicting contradictions.

There is a big difference between liberal arts students and science students, but there are no particularly interesting contradictions. It's just that everyone looks at things differently and from different angles. Everyone is developing in a different field and making their own contributions.

Take the science students around me, and then they are very disgusted, disgusted with political history, and think that there is no use in studying this. Liberal arts students have never belittled science students, and they think that science is very powerful.

Generally, I will hear science students say this at school: What's wrong with you liberal arts students, I really hate to hear such a beginning, first, it's not that I say you don't say I'll shut up, sometimes I hate the superiority that science students bring.

I have the most say on this issue. As a liberal arts student, I am often looked down upon by science students, feeling that we have no logic and empty some emotional ideas. I'm really wondering, how can you choose a science subject and still choose a sense of superiority? Why don't you go to heaven?

I have always heard that science students look down on liberal arts students, and liberal arts students are especially envious of science students. I think it's because science students will have a wider range of careers in the future, while our liberal arts students are more rigid in their employment direction.

For example, I met a liberal arts student who praised her science classmates for reading very tall books, and I would normally say thank you. But the science amateur's painting style changed abruptly, and he even ridiculed her as a liberal arts girl and said: Yes, you also need to read more of this kind of book, liberal arts students are just illogical and emotional.

After graduating from high school in the liberal arts and sciences, some science students said that those liberal arts students chose liberal arts because they didn't understand the sciences, so they were angry with many liberal arts students, and I think what the science students said also has a certain amount of truth, but it should not be generalized, after all, many people choose liberal arts because they like liberal arts and are good at liberal arts, and in the future, both liberal arts and science are needed for work in society. Let's talk about it in detail. <>

1. It is true that some liberal arts students choose liberal arts because they don't understand science.

When high school is faced with the division of subjects, many people will choose their subjects according to their own advantages combined with the situation of the college entrance examination, science students are generally the most, and the competition in science is very fierce, some students are not very good in science, they will choose liberal arts, so that they can go to a similar university in the college entrance examination, so these remarks of science students also have a certain truth, but should not be generalized, this is only part of this is done. <>

2. The future needs science students and liberal arts students to create together.

In society, it is easier for science students to find jobs, but liberal arts students are also quite important, just like some majors, science students do it, not like a language teacher, including literary creation, this kind of work, many liberal arts students don't understand. It also includes history, archaeology, and so on, all of which require the efforts of liberal arts students. In a unit, there are clerical and ordinary positions, so whether in the unit or elsewhere, liberal arts students are as important as science students, and they need to create together in the future, and one subject should not be discriminated against.

All in all, when I go to high school, I will be divided into liberal arts and science, and it is true that some people choose liberal arts because they can't do science, but there are also some people who are not very good at liberal arts, so they choose science, which is only the choice of some people, and should not be generalized, secondly, liberal arts students and science students are very important, they have different divisions of labor in society, but they can create great value for society, so some subjects should not be discriminated against.

Such a statement is very one-sided, not necessarily because they don't understand the sciences before they study liberal arts, some people choose liberal arts because they are interested in liberal arts.

I don't think that's right. Because no matter whether you study science or liberal arts, you can find a suitable job in society in the future, and the meaning of studying is not defined by liberal arts and science, but determined by life goals and career pursuits.

I think that both liberal arts and science are subjects to study, and there is no distinction between high and low in themselves, everyone's interests and hobbies are different, and he decides their choice, and we should respect them, rather than wantonly belittle.

Because many people's impression of science and liberal arts is like the relationship between mathematics and Chinese, from the perspective of school problems, learning mathematics must rely on understanding, while learning Chinese can only rely on memory.

Judging from the stories of some celebrities, for example, Sanmao took a math test at school when she was a child, because she memorized all the questions before, so she got a full score, but how could the teacher believe that Sanmao, who has always been weak in mathematics, could get such a high score, so he decided that she had cheated.

Obviously, liberal arts students are more sociable than liberal arts students. In practice, they have an advantage, liberal arts students have an advantage in their imagination, and liberal arts students learn better in language organization and rhetoric, and continue to have an advantage, so what do science students have? Do they have wild imaginations?

No! They only have the power of arithmetic that is indignant to man and god.

What do science students have? They only know how to deal with the topic, and some people say that science students respond faster?

How so? It's just that the topic is too mechanical.

And I think there are many environments that liberal arts can adapt to. Compare socialization.

I've never seen anyone on the street doing Newton's X-test.

In general, liberal arts students are more bullish than science students.

Liberal arts students are easy to indulge in study and empty talk, liberal arts students think with their hearts, articles are the depression of the heart, liberal arts students are most worried that they are not professional, professional, and their hearts are always empty, liberal arts students need to pay more attention to social reality, most liberal arts students feel that the work is acceptable, the salary is too low, liberal arts students should learn the pragmatism and efficiency of science students, and liberal arts students feel that science students are stupid.

Science students are easy to be confined to rigidity and theory, science students need to open their hearts more, science students need to learn the spirituality and breadth of liberal arts students, science students think with their heads, ** is rigorous wisdom, science students are easy to be confined to rigidity and theory, science students are always most worried that they are too professional, professional, and their hearts are always empty, science students always feel that the work is too boring, the salary is still sloppy, and science students feel that the liberal arts are sour.

Attached] Introduction to the liberal arts and sciences.

Liberal arts is from the study of oneself to the study of the outside world, so the great literati of the past generations always first actively or passively detached from the world, forced to enter their own inner world, after several tempering, finally able to send unprecedented, write a unique value of the chapter, and then to the thought, to the outside world has an effect, this Sima Qian in the "Historical Records" gave a long list of famous examples.

Science is from the study of the outside world to their own hearts, so those genius scientists are curious about the natural phenomena of the outside world very early, have a strong desire to explore the roots, have the desire to understand nature, control nature, and use nature, from Zhang Heng's night counting stars, Chen Jingrun's strong desire for mathematical research when he was young, from Faraday's reluctant pursuit of electromagnetic phenomena, to Tsiolkovsky's dream of traveling in the blue sky, Einstein has been fascinated by the magical power of the compass since he was a child, and science has always actively studied the outside world. The reason is to use the law to rise to the philosophy of science, emancipate the mind, renew the outdated concept of thinking, and bring new products.