Am I good at reading or working?10

Reading more than 10,000 books is not as good as having experience in work.

Of course, reading well is not for how much knowledge you learn, I personally think that you should make a long-term plan for your life now, big goals, and practical problems must be examined. Is it to become a worker? Or become an individual boss?

To become an office worker, you have to study a profession, become a professional, and if you don't want to work for others all the time, you have to develop holistically.

You're still too young. A lot of things are only known through the walk.

You should be thankful that there are so many enthusiastic and good people online.

Upstairs is right, go on, accommodation this problem.

How untenable it seems to us.

There are few people who have gone to school who regret going to school.

It's all regrettable because the university didn't cherish it properly.

Many of the best memories of their lives are in high school and college.

The friendships formed in high school and college are really happy.

A lot of it is not available in society.

It doesn't make much of a difference if you earn money a few years later.

It's nothing if you accumulate experience a few years later.

But you go to school after this period.

That's not the case.

At least not in that mood.

Listen to everyone.

Otherwise you'll regret it.

Knowledge changes fate, so let's read hard.

Reading is a pathway, a way to get close to success.

It is a compulsory course in life.

Whatever you want to do in the future, you have to have this as a foundation.

So. Read some books first.

Living in school is a kind of ability development.

Anyone needs to go through this.

There is no escaping it. There are no excuses, so it's better to read.

Let's go learn something professional! It's easier to find a job.

Reading, of course, believe me!

Reading well, reading does not mean that it will be particularly helpful to your knowledge, the key is that you have learned the ability to think about problems, and the depth of seeing problems is different. Knowledge must be accumulated by ourselves, even in college, and what we need now is the ability to think independently. College can train you, although college life is a bit lazy, but it depends on how you arrange it.

Read a book. There are benefits. I've chosen to go to graduate school. He is currently an intern at the company.

First of all, "reading" here naturally means going to school. In this way, naturally, as many people say, the reading is utilitarian, and this utilitarianism alludes to a kind of expectation.

Undoubtedly, this utilitarianism is certainly right. In the long run, people are rational, and going to school is not just about finding a good job in the future, finding a job that satisfies you, your relatives and society. But if you think about it, there is a hard wound in this kind of thinking:

First, does the school provide the skills needed for the future? dddd

Second, after graduating and finding a stable job, many people stop "studying" (studying) and start a kind of "life is not only far away, but also the current one" (Brother Xun called the insider).

Secondly, there is a sense of "putting jobs, positions, etc." in the theory of the uselessness of reading. Generally speaking, when the national examination is hot and teachers are hot, no one says that "reading is useless"; However, graduate students deliver food and work as real estate agents, so the deformed "useless theory of reading" such as "too much involution" and "waste of talents" emerges in endlessly.

But after all, someone has to sweep the ground and someone has to build the wall, and I believe that those who read this article will tomorrow "the sun will rise as usual, and you will move bricks as usual".

In the end, the theory of the uselessness of reading must ignore one word: high probability. If we quantify success, ordinary people will most likely succeed by going to school.

With this in mind, you can ask rhetorically, why should the country vigorously develop education? (Sometimes arguing with irrational people, irrational playing may have a better effect.) ）

Speaking of which, I would also like to advise those who polarize the "theory that reading is useful" what "reading is too useful" and what "output is reversed input". Why do you say that, two reasons:

First, no one asked under the lamp for ten years, and he became famous all over the world in one fell swoop;

Second, not everyone is qualified to be a beneficiary of "reading" like you and me.