Friends who are familiar with digital cameras come in and chat!

I am a boycott of Japanese products, and if you don't believe in domestic products, I recommend Samsung's to you.

The above 2 connections are all about Samsung's digital cameras, and the reason I recommend Samsung to you is that I use one of them myself, the DigiMax L80, which I feel is acceptable at the price point and everything, and the features are also good.

Image sensor: CCD sensor size: 1 inch Maximum number of pixels (10,000 units):

840 Max resolution (pixels): 3264 2448 Optical zoom factor: 3 Display size (inches) It's all great, and I think you'll love it again if you use it.

The first thing to understand is the brand, followed by the number of pixels, generally about 5 million, and then how many times the zoom, how big the memory card is, and then there is the aftermath, the general after-sales of big brands can be ***!

Around 2000. Don't get too much into the brand. It's all immediate. At a glance, you can see the performance and its effects.

I bought a Samsung i6, and I feel okay, it was 2800 at that time, and now it seems to be about 2000.

3x optical, 5x digital. 6,000,000 pixels, support sound video, ***, watch movies.

The appearance is very good-looking.

I just bought a Canon, the model is A700, both the performance and the appearance are very good, and it is also the most popular brand, and this camera is still the sales champion, **only between 1900 yuan and 2100 yuan.

Let's buy Fuji's. **Affordable. Don't think about it. Casio, the likes of Sony.

It's complicated to measure the full picture.

1. Tolerance to low pressure.

If the battery of digital camera A is used with a warning display, take it out and put it in camera B, if it can be used normally and there is no alarm, it means that machine B has good low-voltage resistance.

2. The quality of the pixel is burned before.

Camera A shoots the same subject under the same conditions with the same number of pixels set by camera A, and then puts it on the computer for comparison to see which is better, noise or magnification.

Note that don't think it's all the same, in fact, there are big differences in color, magnification effect, etc., and this difference is caused by the quality of the CCD. If the first camera is high and the comparison effect is poor, it means that it is not cost-effective. This does not take into account the largest pixels.

In other words, a camera with a maximum of 20 million pixels can also be compared with a camera with a maximum of 6 million.

3. Noise ratio.

In a low-light environment (e.g., indoor lighting at night), the two cameras set the same sensitivity (set to the highest as possible) to shoot the comparison, and the quality of noisy is poor.

Panasonic LX5

Pros: sensor size 1 inch (large CCD), good image quality, Leica certified wide-angle lens, good lens resolution, good macro shooting ability, face tracking, **excellent bokeh effect, excellent backlight resistance, fully automatic**, but also supports manual**, can be used for a long time ** (up to 60 seconds, minimum 1 4000 seconds), high ISO: 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1000, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, Excellent noise cancellation control, battery life:

About 280-320 shots, super large aperture, excellent performance in low light. It also feels good, and the appearance is passable.

Disadvantages: No touch screen, the edge distortion control of the wide-angle image is not good enough, the telephoto end is not long enough, the double optical zoom feels a little less, the 4x digital zoom, the zoom speed is relatively slow.

The price is around 3500, if you think it's expensive, you can choose Panasonic LX3, the performance difference between the two is not very large. LX3**2500 or so.

My own is Canon, but it's not bad to use a friend's Nikon, so I don't recommend buying a Samsung.