Serious legal problem solving... about the property .

Updated on society 2024-04-15
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1.This house is the joint property of your sister and brother-in-law, and each enjoys 1 2,. After the death of your sister, the 1 2 belonging to her will be divided equally between your brother-in-law, daughter, sister's father, sister's mother, and 4 people according to the normal legal inheritance.

    2.A woman who remarries only has co-ownership of the family income or other income obtained after the registration of her marriage to your brother-in-law (such as buying another house after registration). There are no rights to the current property.

    3.If your brother-in-law wants to leave the house to his daughter, then it is enough to transfer the property directly, theoretically with the consent of the sister's father and mother, who are the heirs to part of the property. They can declare a renunciation of inheritance.

    4.Legally, a woman who remarries does not have the right to claim any rights to the property.

    Addendum: You can persuade your brother-in-law on the basis of the law, and if it doesn't work, let your sister's father, mother, and daughter claim to inherit the property and divide the property. In this case, your sister's father and mother cannot renounce the inheritance, and if they do, it will be detrimental to the daughter, and the daughter's share will be reduced.

    If your daughter is under the age of 18, your brother-in-law has an obligation to support her and can also claim child support.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    1. Your brother-in-law can directly transfer the house to his daughter.

    2. There is no need for the consent of others, if he is really good for his daughter.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It depends on the time of marriage and the time of obtaining the real estate certificate on the current real estate certificate, and whether the disputed property has a loan, if these questions can be proven, it is basically okay.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    It's okay, take my word for it, the main thing is that if you really want to help that girl, you're going to go to court. And ask people if it's impossible? If you don't sue, it's absolutely impossible!

    You went to sue, I believe, at the very least, this girl will definitely be able to get the most basic interest protection: custody... Wait, what's her father's attitude?

    No matter how honest you are, you should know how to do it - give her daughter a satisfactory answer...

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It should be said that the money from the mother-in-law's household registration belongs to the mother-in-law's personal property, and the mother-in-law can dispose of it freely, and she can give it to whoever she wants, which is a gift in the legal sense.

    If the resettlement house obtained from demolition and relocation is owned by the property owner of the house to be demolished, it does not need to be distributed.

    Generally speaking, the compensation for the household registration obtained due to demolition and relocation, the personal part of the mother-in-law, and the mother-in-law is willing to distribute, can be distributed to the person who fulfills the main maintenance obligation, that is, the younger son and daughter-in-law.

    The question you are asking is mainly in the category of family relations, which needs to take into account the harmony of family relations, not a legal issue in the strict sense.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    In terms of household registration, if it is a household, it will belong to the youngest son!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Most of them are given to their younger sons, but they should also be given to other sons, unless the mother-in-law notifies that all the money is given to the younger son.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It is distributed to the owner of the property and the co-occupants.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    If your home is rural, and the house is demolished, there are many items in the demolition compensation agreement, of which the large amount (hundreds of thousands to millions) is the homestead compensation, and the small amount includes the early moving fee, the temporary compensation for the occupants, etc. (I have seen this in the agreements in Beijing). The money should be shared by the registered owner of the house to be demolished or the permanent residents (usually the permanent residents), depending on what you are doing for the relocation. As long as the mother-in-law has not died, her money should be her own.

    After death, it will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the inheritance law, including testamentary succession and statutory succession. If the mother-in-law has passed away, the police station has already closed the account, so it is impossible to give you any more money according to the mother-in-law's household registration, and the money still belongs to the people who live on this homestead.

    After all, China's rural land is collectively shared, and if the people in the houses where the demolition is located are not from the rural collective, or are not the owners of the homestead use rights, there is no hope of sharing the money.

    I don't know a lot of the details of your question, but the principle tells you, and you can probably understand it. Hope it helps. Good luck.

Related questions
22 answers2024-04-15

1.A and B met on the train, and A was afraid that he would not wake up when he arrived at the station, so he asked B to wake him up at station A and get off the train, and B readily agreed. When the train arrives at station A, A is asleep and B is not awake. >>>More

24 answers2024-04-15

The business license is only a change of legal representative, which is a change of the business license, but it does not affect the nature of the unit itself, and the original administrative penalty is still valid. >>>More

9 answers2024-04-15

1. Our real estate certificate has been issued, can I check out by legal means now? >>>More

8 answers2024-04-15

No, of course, don't say that you are a party member when applying.

12 answers2024-04-15

Article 217 of the Contract Law The lessee shall use the leased property in accordance with the agreed method. Where there is no agreement on the method of use of the leased property or the agreement is not clear, and it cannot be determined in accordance with the provisions of Article 61 of this Law, it shall be used in accordance with the nature of the leased item. >>>More