After 5G, China s innovation speed has made Americans miscalculate, what caused the United States to

It is because the United States is too confident in itself, and it may be that China is still the backward country in their eyes.

Because in the hearts of Americans, China's science and technology will never be as good as that of the United States, probably because of pride.

Because the United States may not believe that our technology is developing so fast.

It is because of the arrogance of the United States, which considers itself invincible, and ignores the rise of China.

Because in the eyes of Americans, we are still the same China as before, at the same level as before.

Maybe it's because they don't think they're up to this level, and they're too proud.

It is the arrogance of the Americans who feel that the technology of the Chinese is inferior to that of the United States.

Because Americans have always felt that China cannot surpass them, and they have always been very proud.

Americans will suffer a great loss if they look at the current China with their previous view.

The overall scientific and technological strength of the United States is indeed very strong, and there are a lot of dry goods at home, but it is not all of them. China's overall scientific and technological strength still needs to be improved, although it is large and complete, small and complete, but most of them are not refined. We have to look at the problem correctly, the United States has a population of only 300 million, and no matter how hard it tries, it will not be able to monopolize all the top technologies in the world, so it can only focus on development.

At present, China has the most profits in 5G technology. The pace of development is also the fastest in the world, and we have our own voice in some areas. Let's not take the myth of the United States too much, as the world develops, the top technology will be monopolized by some scientific and technological powers, such as:

The United States has a monopoly on chip R&D and manufacturing technology; The Netherlands has a monopoly on top-of-the-line lithography machine technology; Japan has a monopoly on most of the consumables used in chip manufacturing, advanced carbon fiber manufacturing technology; China, South Korea have a monopoly on ultra-thin display screen technology; The world's top bearing manufacturing technology is currently monopolized by Japan, Germany, Sweden, the United States and China; China is the leader in 5G technology; This is the pattern of scientific and technological development in the world today and in the future. It compels all countries to follow the path of mutual respect and win-win cooperation. No one should want to engage in hegemonism, and no one can afford to engage in hegemonism.

First of all, the 5G technology of the United States does not lag behind China, and even is stronger than China at the technical level. The four segments of 5G are the most critical**, China's Huawei accounts for one section, and the United States' Qualcomm accounts for the other three segments. It's just that the United States does not have a large company that implements 5G infrastructure construction, while our Huawei has a one-stop industrial chain from design technology to infrastructure production and construction.

Therefore, in terms of construction and mass production, China is much stronger than the United States. Therefore, on the whole, the 5G strength of the United States and China is actually on the same plane, but their respective advantages are different.

Because I didn't realize this risk, I obviously lagged behind in this regard, and then the United States used various excuses to block the commercial use of 5G, but this is a serious violation of economic laws, and the market doesn't buy it at all!

In the strong, they also have weaknesses, China has many skills that are leading the world, don't think of Lao Mei as omnipotent.

No matter how strong anything is, it can't be strong in all aspects. There are two sides to everything, and when you are strong, it is because others are weak. When you're weak, someone is strong.

Because Huawei's technology is better than that of the United States in terms of baseband and carriers.

Strong technology doesn't mean every part is strong.

The United States has strong scientific research capabilities, why does 5G technology lag behind China? The United States cannot compare with these advantages.

Any technology has shortcomings, there are places that have been missed, they have not found 5G, others have found it, so they will lag behind, their strong technology does not mean that they can be all-encompassing!

The United States has such a strong scientific research capability, why is the technology backward in the five regions, if there is a problem about this problem, it is best to go to the United States and ask the United States ** yourself.

Because the 5G technology that China has invested in is only the mid- and low-frequency band of 5G, the United States must first get the high-band 5G technology out. The difficulty is high, of course, for a long time.

The fact that the United States has strong scientific research capabilities does not mean that it is technologically backward, but that it has not done research.

It is possible to develop different areas in the study of others.

1. The number of base stations in China has led the world.

According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's "September 2018 Communications Industry Economic Situation", as of the end of September, China's mobile communication base stations reached 6.39 million, of which the total number of 3G 4G base stations reached 4.79 million, and the United States 4G base stations only had more than 200,000. China accounts for more than 60% of the more than 5 million 4G base stations in the world, far exceeding the sum of other countries in the world.

In the construction of 5G base stations, Ke Ruiwen, chairman of China Telecom, said at the results conference that 40,000 5G base stations will be built by the end of this year, distributed in about 50 cities, according to this trend, China's 5G base stations will cover all prefecture-level cities in 2020.

2. China already has the largest NSA 5G base station.

At present, China has built 350,000 base stations to support NSA 5G communications, while the United States has built less than 30,000 5G base stations in the same time period. From the perspective of base station construction, the scale of China's 5G base station is 10 times that of the United States, and China is currently the world's largest NSA 5G network.

3. The pace of 5G commercial use in China is faster than that of the United States.

China began to prepare for the 5G industry in 2015, and began to start the 5G technology research and development test in 2016, and on December 10, 2018, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology officially issued a license for the use of low-frequency test frequencies in the system to China Telecom, China Mobile and China Unicom, and the test preparations were basically completed. In June this year, the 5G commercial license was officially issued, and the scale and speed of 5G base station deployment and off-site trials of the three major operators were faster than those in the United States. Fourth, China's 5G** is the lowest tariff in the world**.

In terms of 5G tariffs, the US operator AT&T charges 70 US dollars for 15GB 5G traffic for 15Gb5G traffic, which is about 480 yuan; Among the tariff standards of the three mobile operators in South Korea, the lowest starting price of 5G ** is 55,000 won (about 325 yuan), and although China's 5G official ** tariff has not yet been officially announced, China Telecom has said that **The setting will be optimized according to the characteristics of 5G, ** traffic will be more, and the tariff is also guaranteed to be affordable for everyone.

We believe that we are really underestimating the huge economic and social benefits brought by 5G technology.

First, the full promotion and implementation of 5G technology is actually a far-reaching revolutionary increase in labor productivity, which is no less significant than the Internet revolution. The Internet solves the relationship between people and information, while 5G technology solves the problem of production efficiency, in other words, the Internet is a revolution in relationships, and the object is people, while 5G technology is a revolution in productivity, which directly benefits the entire industry;

Second, the ultra-fast transmission speed has completely surpassed the traditional network transmission speed, so that people can not feel any information delay at all, the advantage of this is that remote control will become the mainstream mode of production, will break the distance of time and space, even the telemedicine surgery with particularly high requirements for time delay is so easy, not to mention other remote production control?

Fourth, bring a new production and scientific research collaborative work network system, if combined with holographic projection technology, all seminars and education do not need to go to the scene, and even technical research can be operated 24 hours a day, which will greatly improve the efficiency of scientific research and production;

Fifth, detonate a new round of technological revolution. There have been three waves of technological revolution in the world, the first is the large-scale use of steam engines, the second is the large-scale promotion of electrification, the third is the large-scale promotion of electronic computers, life technology, and space technology, and 5G will detonate the fourth technological revolution, this revolution is guided by 5G technology, with quantum computers and communications as the conditions, driven by new energy and new power (artificial sun, antiparticle propulsion, etc.), and with artificial intelligence as the core, to promote the comprehensive upgrading and development of human economy and society. The impact is even more far-reaching.

Therefore, as an overall and strategic 5G technology, the United States is worried, and whatever the other side is worried about, we must unswervingly promote it with the strength of the whole country and win in the future!

First of all, the most technologically advanced company in the 5G field is Huawei, and Huawei is a Chinese company, and in addition to Huawei, China also has ZTE, which is also a giant in the 5G field.

China also has ZTE, which is also a giant in the 5G space. Compared to the United States, which only has Qualcomm, they are still much worse.

At present, our country's 5G technology is at the forefront of the world, and many countries have allowed China to build base stations there, which shows their desire for 5G technology, which the United States cannot do, and there are rumors that the United States' 5G and 4G are similar.

In China, in addition to Huawei and ZTE, there are 5G in the United States, only Qualcomm is much worse than China.

And in terms of key technologies, only Huawei has patents. In other words, Huawei can collect patent fees from the whole world, just like Qualcomm.

And in addition to Huawei, China also has ZTE, which is also a giant in the 5G field. Compared to the United States, which only has Qualcomm, they are still much worse.

As for Nokia and Ericsson in Europe, they do not have as many patents as Huawei, and in key technologies, only Huawei has patents. In other words, Huawei can collect patent fees from the whole world, just like Qualcomm.

I think the United States is far inferior to China in the field of 5G.

I think Qualcomm in the United States is still the world's largest 5G baseband company. After Intel withdrew from the production of 5G baseband, Qualcomm, Huawei, Samsung, MediaTek, and other companies were left in the worldSpreadtrum's five companies can also produce 5G basebands, but looking at the global mobile phone market, because Samsung and Huawei have not officially started to sell 5G basebands, Qualcomm is still the first choice for global mobile phone manufacturers, so among all 5G basebands, Qualcomm can be said to be the largest one.

In the network of the 5G overall equipment production group, the communication manufacturing industry in the United States is only Cisco one company that can produce the core network and the transmission network of the 5G group network, the two most important products, and there is still no company that can produce the 5G base station part, which is undoubtedly a trend of Cisco alone.

At the beginning of the construction of the network, in fact, there were some strong enterprises in the United States that specialized in the production of communication equipment, such as Qualcomm, Motorola, Lucent, the three giants, and a Canadian telecommunications company that could barely be included in the circle of production of communication equipment in the United States - Nortel.

However, in the beginning, Qualcomm was still relatively weak. In the 2G era, in order to promote and develop its own CDMA technology, Qualcomm sold the communication equipment produced at a low price to Ericsson, a European company that also produces communication equipment, so it launched the main production of mobile communication equipment;

A few years later, Europe's Elsin and Nokia gradually completed the acquisition of the wireless business of American mobile communications equipment manufacturers after many storms and waves.

And now it seems that in the United States, in general, no equipment manufacturer can mass-produce equipment that requires 5G wireless access network partsTherefore, the US operators decisively rejected some of China's ZTE, Huawei and other strong communications companies, so the United States can only make an important choice between Nokia, Ericsson, and Samsung.

I don't think it's as good as China's development, because after all, 5G was developed by Huawei.

I think there should be some development, because after all, Huawei's 5G technology has been shared with them.

Everyone's starting point is basically the same, and in the 5G battle, our country's advantages are still very obvious.

I think it should be in the initial stage, Huawei gave 5G technology to the United States, so the United States 5G technology has also begun to develop rapidly.

At present, the five G in the United States seems to be stagnant, and if Huawei does not give the technology, it may still be at a loss.

I think there should be some development, but it is not as good as my country.

This should still be developing, and the technology is definitely not so good.

This year is in the initial stage, and the development situation and the future are a little better.

It should have just been experimental, and there shouldn't be much of a breakthrough.

It should also be catching up with the progress, and the establishment of a base station macro base station or something, may not be as good as in China.

Foreign media reported on Thursday that China is focusing on the construction of the world's largest 5G mobile communication network in the competition for technological leadership. Is China ahead of the United States in the 5G technology competition? Let Jintou answer for you!

The foundation and catalyst of Deloitte Consulting. The fundamental advantage of being a first mover is that a business model is built on this basis and exported to other countries.

South Korea's mobile operator is the first to launch commercial 5G services. SK Telecom launched the network in April, and Samsung Electronics has also provided 5G-enabled smartphones. In the U.S., carriers in places like Minneapolis and Chicago have already started offering 5G services.

However, in the next five years, China will be in a clear leading position in this field.

China's largest stool company has established a leading position in 5G patents. Huawei, the world's largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer, is a leader in this area. According to IPLYTICS, a Berlin-based patent information platform, ZTE ranks third.

On the other hand, the ** segment assists operators in reducing costs. Mr. Addison Lee, head of Hong Kong's telecommunications research, said that China's ** sector provides bandwidth for 5G networks almost free of charge. By comparison, U.S. carriers spent $2.7 billion on two 5G spectrum auctions, according to the Federal Communications Commission.

In India, industry groups representing operators said their members could not afford to scale the spectrum auction, which is expected to reach $84 billion.

Chinese careers are also less costly in terms of base station construction. According to Mr. Addison's calculations, the unit price of these base stations in China may only be about $30,000, and the average sales** in developed markets may reach $60,000. Fifty thousand dollars.

China's two largest carriers say they will only lease equipment, so the annual upfront cash outlay for each base station can be reduced to about $6,500.

Deloitte Consulting estimates that in the U.S., 5G network construction is a matter for companies to do their job. U.S. operators pay at least five times as much as Chinese counterparts for civil and 5G construction permits.

According to U.S. data, China has deployed about 350,000 5G-enabled base stations, about 10 times that of the U.S.