Do you know which Call of Duty 5 or 4 is fun, give some advice, thanks

Same as the first one,There's everything else.,Call of Duty 5 Chinese it's a little harder to find.,But the game is very cool.,There are zombies.,And the air bubble on the plane and the like.,Call of Duty 4 also has an air bubble but it's better than Call of Duty 5.,Call of Duty 5's is better.,After all, you can run back and forth in the plane.,It's just too high .......

The second is the image quality, I think the image quality of COD4 is stronger than COD5, and for some CF, CS is ......All float by.

And the most important thing is that I like that kind of background.,But now I think,Playing World War II games seems to be able to understand World War II better (except for those rubbish games that fool people with old guns and old guns),I played cod2.,I learned a lot.。 It's up to you to @

Call of Duty 4 is easy to play in Chinese.

I think it's still 4 fun.

However, the 5 scene is grander, it depends on whether you like the devils and Germans in World War II or the Russians with automatic rifles.

The first floor is right, depending on whether you like modern warfare or World War II. Call of Duty 5 has a co-op mode, which 4 doesn't have.

The co-op mode is a single-player mode and multi-player co-op mode. For this you can play 5,4 plots are very good, you can also try.

Let's play them all overall. Definitely great value for money.

Aside from the technical aspects of the game, graphics, operations, etc.

If you want to experience that kind of exhilarating cinematic feel of a Hollywood blockbuster, play 4

If you want to study the darkest and deepest human nature of war, and experience the darkest and most oppressive side of human nature, then play 5

Truth be told, 4 is a Call of Duty innovation both in terms of plot setting and gameplay. 5 It seems to be back to the old ways, and there is no novelty.

Finally, I recommend 4 to be fun.

5 fun 4 not interesting I like to use the gun of the jap in 5 the most haha I poke I poke I poke I poke hard!

Call of Duty 4 is a bit better in my personal opinion because it's Modern Warfare **more bullish

Agree with 0123.

After I cleared the level of 5 plays, I opened the lowest difficulty and played the 2nd level. A handful of m1 and a 38 big cover with a bayonet began to poke!

That's called a cool. The most important thing is to poke the blood. Puff puff flow !

It is recommended that people who are not psychologically tolerant do not play cod5

It depends on whether you like World War II or modern warfare.

On the screen: one is a game of 08 years, the other is a game of 17 years, and the gap of 9 years is earth-shattering, so Call of Duty 5 is inferior to Call of Duty 14 in terms of the level of detail and dynamics of pure graphics. But from my personal point of view, I think the Call of Duty 14 graphics give me the illusion of a shiny gloss after a lot of rendering, and it looks a bit greasy.

The graphics of Call of Duty 5 are very rough, I think it can better reflect the iron and blood of World War II, and in fact, Call of Duty 5 was a small graphics crisis back then. (Picture improvement + optimization is too poor).

In terms of content: Call of Duty 5's narrative structure is more ambitious, from the Pacific War to the Soviet-German battlefield, the two lines are parallel, and the time span is 41 to 45 years. And Call of Duty 5 is even bigger, with the landing on Perry Iwur Island and the storming of the Capitol showing the grandeur of World War II.

Although in terms of grandeur, I only serve Call of Duty 1 in the battle of Stalingrad, hehe. Call of Duty 14 is narrated from the perspective of a small U.S. military detachment from the Normandy landings to the crossing of the Rhine, the same story that has been largely told in the U.S. campaign in Call of Duty. The subject matter is repetitive.

Compared with Group T, I think Sledgehammer still owes some heat in the production of Call of Duty, such as Call of Duty 14, various guns crossing, bullet action bugs, etc., which have been criticized. The T group has participated in the production of the World War II-themed Call of Duty as early as the Call of Duty 1 expansion joint attack, and in Call of Duty 5, it also vividly reflects the cruelty and ruthlessness of World War II, such as the crazy Japanese army, interspersed with various character creations, such as Rezenov is a very successful representative. What's more, the political correctness of the United States is vividly reflected in 14, black officers, female soldiers on the battlefield, avoiding the depiction of killing prisoners, and 5 is much more realistic in comparison.

To sum up, I think that 5 except for the picture, other expressions are better than 14, 14 may be the beginning of the COD series to return to World War II, although it is not satisfactory, but it can also be regarded as a turning point in the history of COD.

Personally, I feel that 14 is more emotional, and when you first play 14, you will feel that the sense of bringing in is strong. And compared to the plot, 14 is also a little richer than 5.

Large-scale battlefield play 5 generations,14The picture quality and sense of substitution are very good。

It's okay, but the ** of World War II will be a lot worse than it is now.

Zombies are quite annoying. Sometimes when you turn around and see a zombie, you get startled.

As for the graphics, the graphics are still good, but some items don't look very good because of the use of textures.

cod5 is okay, right, the guns are all 2 battles, how can zombies be cute? It is recommended that you play MW3

It's a good story of World War II, there's the Battle of Midway, and the most exciting thing is that you get to the Reichstag in Germany, where Hitler worked, and I played it all, and each has its own characteristics.

In Call of Duty 5, you can not only use the old guns of the 2 wars, but also use a lot of very magical **, after giving all, you can use the default ** (, real pistol, hand-made gun) laser gun in the zombie level, and the head (that is, the claw of the zombie) can shoot artifacts such as the M1911 of the Bazooka missile.