Which picture is better, Tomb Raider or Call of Duty?

If visually speaking, the graphics of Call of Duty are atmospheric and shocking, and the graphics of Tomb Raider are similar to Assassin's Creed, which has a very meaningful feeling.

In terms of special effects, Tomb Raider is good [the above refers to Call of Duty 9 and Tomb Raider 9].

Both are games with better graphics, and it is recommended to experience both if recommended Priority Call of Duty.

It's not a kind of game, it can't be compared, for example, the graphics of Crysis 3 are okay, and the graphics of Borderlands 2 are okay, but they can't be compared, after all, the painting style is different, even if it is the same kind of Call of Duty 8 and Battle 3, it can't be compared, the engine, light and shadow, lighting layout and rendering are not the same type, and they can't be compared, but Battlefield 3 can be compared with Battlefield 4, and Mission 6 can be compared with Mission 8.

Tomb Raider and Call of Duty are not the same type at all, not only the game type is different, but the graphics are also different, if you insist on who is good, Tomb Raider 9 is better than Call of Duty 9 in high image quality (in terms of details, scenery).

In order to take care of the low-end user base, Call of Duty's engine is still not as good as Battlefield, Tomb Raider and the like. Therefore, the Call of Duty series is not about the quality of the graphics compared to other games, but about the huge, excellent, and engaging plot. Mission 4's classic sniper level is still talked about.

What's wrong with the picture not being gorgeous? That strong sense of involvement, the grief of the death of a comrade-in-arms. Did other games give it?

Soap, Ghost, Yuri and other comrades who have passed away are still missed.

Tomb Raider, because it uses a CE engine, the picture is super good, but the configuration requirements are also high. Call of Duty uses an IW engine, which has average graphics but low configuration requirements.

These are two different types of games, so they can't be confused.

You have to look at the generations, but Call of Duty is still a little higher for graphics cards, and the new ones have recently come out of the 10

I feel that Tomb Raider is better, the requirements for the graphics card are not high, Call of Duty 7 is quite demanding, Call of Duty 10 needless to say, the configuration is high, there is an article about testing Call of Duty 10, saying that when running Call of Duty 10, when you are in the Shanna Pass with the words Hollywood, you will move the crosshair to the left, and the frame rate will drop by 10 frames in an instant, and sometimes the CPU usage is very high. So, I think Call of Duty 7 and 10 are quite a drain on graphics cards.

Battlefield: Rebel Company 2 The rest is a PS3 game that tells you that you can't play it.

Can you configure it? If you can, 09 is all masterpieces, and there is nothing bad about the picture.

Call of Duty plays shootout shootouts.

Tomb Raider plays the plot.

Assassin's Creed plays with operations and quests.

It's all good, the style is different, depending on what type you like to play.

It's not a game of any kind at all, how do you make others compare?

Both Call of Duty and Shadow of the Tomb Raider are good and both are must-play games.

Good landlord Tomb Raider 9 configuration is higher than Call of Duty 9 The picture quality alone is not the same level as Call of Duty 9 If you can play smoothly Tomb Raider 9 will definitely be able to play Call of Duty 9 [I'm a joke, I'll feed myself a bag of salt].

Call of Duty 9

Minimum configuration: System: Windows Vista SP2 or Windows 7

cpu： intel core2 duo e8200 ghz or amd phenom x3 8750 ghz

RAM: 2GB for 32-bit OS or 4GB for 64-bit OS

Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT 512 MB or ATI Radeon HD 3870 512 MB

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 or AMD Phenom X3 8750 or better

RAM: 2GB

Hard disk: 15GB

Graphics: Shader or Better 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT ATI Radeon X1950Pro or better

Sound Card: DirectX

Tomb Raider 9 minimum specs:

Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 (32-bit, 64-bit).

DirectX 9 graphics card with 512M VRAM: AMD Radeon HD 2600 XT, NVIDIA 8600

Dual-core CPU: AMD Athlon64 x2 GHz (4050+), Intel Core2 Duo GHz (E6300).

1GB RAM (Vista requires 2GB)

Recommended: Windows XP SP3, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 (32-bit, 64-bit).

DirectX 11 graphics card with 1GB of VRAM: AMD Radeon HD 4870, NVIDIA GTX 480

4-core CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 565, Intel Core i5-750

4GB RAM.

According to the comparison, it can be seen that the configuration between the two is about the same, but the recommended configuration of Tomb Raider 9 has slightly higher requirements for graphics card memory, so if you can play Tomb 9, you will definitely be able to play cod9, and if you can play cod9, as long as the picture effect is slightly reduced, Tomb 9 can still be played.

It's pretty much the same, but Head & Shoulders in the Tomb is more advanced than Mission 9, and if you can play one of them, you should be able to play the other.

Tomb Raider 9 is demanding, especially after the hair effects are turned on.

If you can play Tomb 9, you can definitely play Mission 9.

1500 a little more than GTX760Or the GTX660ti should have 1500 for the cheapest of the two...No more than GTX660 and video memory are not the key to determining the performance of a graphics card. Don't be fooled by graphics cards that only have high video memory.

This GTX660Ti with a good 1499 is still 2G. But Zotac. So be it.

That's it for the mainstream of about 1500. It's okay to turn on all the game effects you mentioned. You look at the ** and choose the one that is acceptable. I don't know if your other configurations are not good for you.

What is the price of a general notebook?。。。 According to the current situation, the mid-range notebook is about 6000, and the current game operation is definitely fine, and the effect cannot be guaranteed.

To play games, the computer is of course a desktop computer with high performance and high cost performance.

If the budget is insufficient, you can buy a PS4 game console for about 2,000, and the big works are basically available, and the effect is also very good after special optimization.

The average notebook will be very stuck to play this, but if the notebook CPU is i5 or more of the fourth generation, and the graphics card is GTX940M or above, you can play these games, and the effect of special effects can also be improved with the improvement of the configuration. Generally, it is recommended to buy a desktop version for playing games, because the desktop is much cheaper than the notebook with the same configuration, and the desktop with the same configuration can be cheaper by more than a thousand, and you can assemble various accessories with your hobbies.

It should be OK.,But special effects,All kinds of things in the picture have to shrink.,8570m is not a good card.。

It's a bit of a shame that the games you're talking about are all difficult.

Because laptops are not suitable for playing big games.

Special effects can be played at low points.。。 This book is a little pit.。。。

can't open a high configuration, and others can barely pass.