-
I just bought a set of machines on TB, 6400 meters, and I haven't got it yet. I've also considered the problem of lens groups and warranty issues, but compared to Nikon and Canon, I personally like the K5's colors the most (Nikon has high sharpness, Canon is light, close to real colors, and Pentax colors are relatively more intense). As for the lens, the old domestic lens can be used, the auxiliary factory can be used, Pentax also has a lot of good heads, cheap and expensive, like I just play, I don't burn the lens, and I don't like to exchange with people or anything, so I don't care about the lens.
What's more, photographic technology is the most important, followed by equipment. If you travel, K5 is also smaller than the other two, and there are three defenses. . .
I like Nikon's brand very much, D7000 I also considered it, and it's very fashionable to take it out, but the poor, the set is now 9400+, and I can't afford it.
I haven't noticed Canon, my colleagues and friends have bought Canon, she has a lot of shots, and if you burn the equipment in the future, you can burn it slowly, and you can still use it when you change the whole outfit. Our colleagues highly recommend Canon to me, but I myself like Pentax**.
It is recommended that the landlord take a look at the samples and see which one you like, all three are good machines, and you will not regret buying them.
-
K-5 is clearly more handsome! I love the green circles on the lens, hehe.
In fact, in terms of stand-alone performance, the K-5 seems to be stronger. Sure, the focusing speed and accuracy are slightly worse than those of the N C family.
Speaking of lenses, Pentax can also use a head like a domestic phoenix, and you can get it under 2008 manual heads, which other one has this advantage?
Pertinently, the K-5 is better for tourism, light and waterproof (this tour should be often encountered!) )
-
If you want to use full frame in the future, then go to 60D or D7000 with full pair.
If you don't care about APS and full pairing, this ** is suitable for K5, after all, it is the APS flagship of the P family, and there are many shots to play. The 3 sets of heads for travel are OK, but the telephoto of 18-55 is slightly shorter.
-
In terms of comprehensive performance, quality, and cost performance, K5 is the first choice, but Pentax's brand is there, niche, and Pentax's lenses are far less than Canon Nikon's options, and the after-sales service is the same (of course, buying parallel goods is the same)! All in all, if you are not ready to burn the lens in the future, and you are not ready to go to full frame, then choose K5, you will not be disappointed; If not, then you choose Canon or Nikon, some time ago the floods in Thailand, Nikon D7000 production line there has been stopped, it is said that it will not be restored until 2012, but the production line will be transferred to other places of production early, it is estimated that in mid-December, the ** of D7000 should be significantly reduced. So if you can endure the loneliness, just wait for the price of D7000 to drop, and you can also stand 60D!
-
First of all,,Cameras at this price are almost the same.,It's better than cards.,But you may have to wear a full set or something in the future.。。
So it's still Canon.,,The lens is the king of the SLR.。。
-
K5 is equipped with 18-55WR rugged, 18-55WR imaging quality is good.
-
It's up to you.
If you have high requirements for focusing, choose 7D, which is better than the other two in terms of focusing speed, focus tracking ability, and dark focusing, and is one of the best in C-frame SLR.
If you don't have high requirements for focus, then K5, no matter in terms of color, image quality, tolerance, and high sensitivity, K5 is much better than the other two.
And 60D doesn't need to be considered, the performance is worse than 7D and K5, and it is better than K5, and you can directly eliminate it among the three.
-
For 7D, you should know that 7D is positioned as a journalist machine, and what makes it better than other APS-C format machines is its focus accuracy and speed, continuous shooting speed, dual image processors, and workmanship. Do you usually use a lot of fast focus and violent continuous shooting? If you're just taking pictures of landscapes, posing for portraits, flowers and plants, there's no need to pay for this aspect of performance.
And the high sense of 7D has been criticized even now.
The remaining K5 and 60D, for their comprehensive quality, judging from the official data given, I think K5 beats 60D (from the perspective of fuselage performance alone). If you have personal requirements for a brand, that's a different story.
Finally, I personally recommend that you also consider Nikon's D7000
-
In principle, it is to choose what you can accept, the more expensive the better!
But then again, if you don't have a big budget, you don't need 7D, and you can't afford a good head, sorry for this camera.
In addition, it is best to be able to test the weight by yourself, the 7D film is beautiful, but if you shoot while walking, it will tire you to death! It's so heavy ......
The 60D and K5 are completely another grade.
If you want to put on a literary and artistic little fresh style, there is no need for 7D.
-
7D doesn't look good now.,K5's words are not bad.,Cost-effective.,Good lenses are also available.,But Pentax doesn't have a full set.,You have to think carefully about getting on the full set in the future.,Avoid destroying the door**。 If you are not in a hurry to use it, you can wait for D7100, K5IIS can also be considered, after all, the current trend is low-pass filters. 60D doesn't need to be considered, AF fine-tuning is not available.
-
1. All medium frames are not used by ordinary people, ** not to mention, this thing is not used to shoot landscapes or ordinary photography, most of them are used to shoot models or posters in the studio! Relatively speaking, full-frame should be the pinnacle of civilian SLR How to popularize it will take a few years, and now it can be ignored for the time being
K5People who have used it will basically give a medium to high evaluation But Canon, after all, most Nikon users generally look down on a niche brand like Pentax But I have to say that K5's metal body, three-proof function, rich color, beautiful body, there are still a lot of advantages There are also a few lenses, but very beautiful Each one can be called a work of art As for the price reduction, remember that K5 was tens of thousands of yuan at the beginning, and D7000 is about the same ** Now 7000 is still sold for 8000 It shows how low Canon Nikon's cost performance is
-
There's no need to worry about this, K5 is the king of C format, and there's nothing to compare. But what I want to remind you is that if you don't plan to invest again or less after playing, then you will K5, if you want to enter full frame or become a lens controller in the future, then you will buy 60D
**Too high to play hahaha, although I play k5
-
Choose the Canon 60D, Canon has a comprehensive lens library that will allow you to get 120% out of your camera. If you're in love with photography, why don't you choose a wider path for yourself? Don't take it for granted that you won't invest in it again, there's an old saying:
The plan hasn't changed quickly.
-
The imaging chip area of the moving brand APS-C is only 89% of that of other companies, and the high-sensitivity image quality is not as good as the level of PNS
And there are not many lenses for APS-C either.
P family is good at more than 30 lenses,Most of them are launched for APS-C If you have no complaints about the full frame,Decisively enter K5,Definitely stronger than the cross-section in the 60D If you have a grudge against the full frame,And the economy is abundant,How much will you burn some lenses in the future,60DIf you start with K5,It is recommended to 18-55wr,Three-proof,Small,The image quality is enough,I suspect that the 18-55 image quality is not good,You can enter the second-hand 16-45,Constant F4 aperture,Wide angle to 16,Constant aperture zoom head, At the same time, the brand new ones within 3k are only Pentax;
If you shoot people, you will enter the da70, and you can count it as a calf's head, and there is nothing to say about color and sharpness. Pentax mainly plays small, or it plays with many veteran hands.
-
Don't be entangled, decisive K5 buy 60d, it's better to get a 550d, the same thing, just one more shoulder screen for an aluminum shell.
Lens recommendation 16-50 didn't say, this has the back of my own look like the fixed focus of 21 biscuits and 70 biscuits, the princess don't say it, and the red letter Baiwei, the red letter 70-210 Although he is an old man, he has strong skills, and novices choose cheap 18-55 and 55-300, don't touch 18-135 Nothing but the motor is bad.
-
In January 2013, 60d bare metal 4000, not so cheap, I think there is a problem, please be careful.
The K5 bare metal 4500 is also a little cheaper, but there are K5-2 and K5-2S after K5, so compare it more on the Internet.
60D and K5, bare metal around 6,000, K5 is cheaper, more than 5,000. The ** behind the K5 is more expensive.
K5 plus DA18-55WR (about 6,005), portrait selection DA70 (about 2800 yuan), DA50 or so). Manual heads are not recommended.
60d plus 18-135 (about 7,005) set of cameras to shoot portraits is OK, if you have money, add another 85 **Forget, cheaper than DA70 is more expensive than DA50)
-
Compared to a stand-alone machine, Pentax K5 is slightly better than Canon 60D. But the Canon is far superior to Pentax, because there are so few lenses for Pentax mounts. You say "Canon is too common......"In fact, it is the advantage of Canon, because Canon is common, so there will be a lot of corresponding accessories, including lenses.
If you are ready to buy Pentax K5, we recommend a few models corresponding to the "Three Treasures of the Poor": DA 18-55mm F AL, DA L 55-300mm F, corresponding to Canon's ** Pentax of this level, there is only one, more than 3000. If you want to play high-end, Pentax does not have a full-frame SLR, only a medium-format SLR (the sensor size is 44x33mm, and the sensor area is twice that of a full-frame camera, which is really too professional).
If you want to play with high-end lenses, it is recommended to choose Nikon and Canon.
-
I use Pentax. It is necessary to consider that the after-sales service of Pentax in China is much worse.
-
Pentax can take portraits of the three princesses, or a large aperture telephoto is also very good. As for taking pictures when traveling, you can choose scenery and portraits!
-
I went to Pentax because I knew Pentax, and if I didn't know Pentax, I still went to Canon.
-
Pentax K5 bar is much stronger than Canon 60D... There is no comparison.
-
600D vs K5, definitely K5;
60d vs k5, half a pound and eight taels. It's all right. The K5 is a little more powerful. The 60D lens is a little better. Either way. Let's see what brand there are around you.
-
See if you plan to upgrade your lenses in the future.
1. If you will continue to burn lenses in the future, especially tens of thousands of bull heads, of course, Canon's machine is the first choice, 60D is now very cheap, 5110 of water, but 6020
2. If you plan to have one camera and one camera or play niche fixed focus, K-5 is recommended, Pentax's DA head is generally stronger than Canon's EF-S head, and there are more choices. There must be a suitable choice for low 18-55, medium 17-70, high 16-50, etc.
In addition, the K-5 has stronger performance than the 60D in terms of body performance, but the choice of lens is more critical than the choice of the body.
-
The KX is still very good as an entry-level machine. **Also moderate However, relatively speaking, there are more after-sales outlets of Canon Nikon, considering the after-sales maintenance in the future, it is recommended to choose Canon Nikon's machine, add some money to choose 60D, intermediate entry machine, and it is convenient to replace the lens in the future.
-
Definitely choose Canon 60D, Pentax has few lenses, and the imaging is average.
-
These three are definitely the best in K5! The K5 lens is relatively small compared to the NC two, but it is definitely enough for you! The main problem is that the in-production lenses of the P family are expensive and not cost-effective!
But you can also choose the deputy factory, and you can even play the old manual head, the old manual head, that is the king of cost performance, the compatibility of the P family's machine to the manual head, it is definitely NC two can not be compared, who uses who knows!
-
Pentax forget it.
Regardless of the K5 camera itself, Pentax is already on the wane. This can be seen from his after-sales outlets in Chinese mainland.
In fact, when it comes to cameras alone, the three cameras listed by the landlord are all good, meet the requirements of photography, and there is no problem.
-
The P family is a small minority. It is said to be a German taste. Nothing else is ... The lens group still depends on n c...
-
Three brands of SLR have been used, and I personally recommend the 60D one.
-
You must use a macro lens to shoot accessories, and Canon's macro lens, you can only buy 100L.........Pentax's waterproof Baiwei is obviously much cheaper, and the quality is not much worse, and the second-hand FA Baiwei is only about 2,000 yuan, and the first level of the new deputy factory is ......If you are poorer, you can get a second-hand 50 micro or something, and less than 2,000 yuan can be done.
The K5's focusing system is not bad, the focusing accuracy is even a little better than that of 60D, and there is a ...... for fine-tuning focusingTo say that the K5 focus is worse than 7D is acceptable, and to say that it is worse than 60D is ......nonsense
Black K5 focus is usually said to be easy to pull the bellows for dark focusing,But this is also due to Pentax's focus setting concept,The same environment,K5 feels bad,It will honestly card back and forth to tell you that I can't aim at you and look at it......And 60d is me, I don't care if you align it or not, anyway, I'll give you a focus, you can watch it......You won't shoot accessories in the black rumbling place......
Merit. 1.The imaging quality is high, although the number of diagonal points is not much, but they are all relatively accurate, especially the ** focus point, which is an eight-way double cross, with high focusing accuracy, and the tracking and shooting of moving objects is very clear. >>>More
First of all, none of you are experts. It's a place where we can learn from each other, have fun and make progress together. >>>More
Alas, the experts did not get to the point at all: this is the product of two companies. >>>More
18-135 is basically enough, there is no need to go to 200. >>>More
I've been in this business for six or seven years, and if you're a beginner, it's recommended not to pay too much attention to the function of the fuselage, because the performance of the two fuselages you mentioned should be able to meet your requirements. If you are not short of money, it is recommended to go to 7d, otherwise it is recommended to go to 50d. Because I once evaluated 50d, I know more about its performance. >>>More