60d original 18 135 or Tamron 18 200??

18-135 is basically enough, there is no need to go to 200.

The zoom magnification of 18-200 is too large, and the image quality is not very good.

In the future, when you have money, buy some heads with small zoom magnification, such as Xiaoxiaobai 70-200F4.

Two reasons: 1, the original lens is better than the analogue, 2, the lens of 18-200 actually can't achieve the effect of 200 at all, at most 170, this is still more, and the picture quality is extremely poor, so generally 18-135 is enough.

The budget is sufficient or the original head, 18-135 travel is enough. There's no need for 18-200 anymore.

Origin is the best choice.

If it were me, of course I would choose the original one.

Hello. 60D + Tamron 18-200, it's really expensive, and I don't know your area, so I don't know how expensive it is.

If you buy this thing, you must not look at the giveaway, to tell you the truth, everything they give you is worthless, if you open a store, will you give away a particularly good thing as a giveaway? (in general).

Advantages of this combination: 1It has a wide range of focal lengths, which is suitable for travel without going out to take pictures.

2.I thought about it for a long time and couldn't think of it.

Disadvantages of this combination: 1All kinds of imaging are weak, all kinds of color shifts, especially the 200 ends, can be said to be miserable.

2.This combination is not suitable for entry-level beginners who want to develop photography as a long-term hobby.

The machine is more modest, but it also has some fancy features, so this lens can't be used.

Personally, I feel that people who are new to photography are directly on 60d, and 550d is enough as an entry machine, just like 1100d, and it feels a little bit lower. This fuselage is still not a big problem, it is not a few silvers.

As for the lens, 18-200 was fooled by the merchant when he saw this. He can't sell this head, right?

Again, if you don't have very special requirements, you'll gradually find out how boring this head is. Getting started with telephoto will have some bad effects on your future development. That is, it is not conducive to the cultivation of basic skills.

My point of view is still, the entry is the entry, the rules 18-55 and then the dog is also it, you may fall in love with it, in fact, I have always thought that 18-55 is very good, haha. Can it also be reversed... When you fall in love with photography, reorient your choices, maybe you need 70-200 novices at that time, maybe you can.

ps: It's not very cost-effective to buy; See above for other questions. If you can change it, you can change it, and if you can't change it, you can play it first, and just pay attention to the purpose of the telephoto.

I personally don't think it's a matter of consideration, Canon's words exist outside the red circle, and even the red circle may be, which involves more professionalism and really doesn't need to be considered. One and a half of the hundreds of shots you've taken is out of focus, and then what? Let's summarize it slowly in practice, practice is the best teacher, and it is better than anyone else says.

You didn't say what the price was.

Source: In terms of giveaways, it can also be bai

Tenron's lens imaging is generally called Canon's original zhi, and the focal length covers the more complete DAO This is an advantage, but the imaging of the telephoto end is average, and it's okay to shoot a moon and hit a bird or something.

If the requirements are not high, the travel belt is good.

When using, be careful not to enter the dust, and clean it up in time after shooting.

Try not to use the auxiliary factory, and the novice generally uses the auxiliary factory to run the coke.

The advantage is that you can shoot from wide angle to telephoto, but the disadvantage, the lens lacks bright spots, and it is very mediocre.

If you don't want to continue burning, I recommend four sets.

In the case of the original factory, there are two options:

1. One is a combination of 18-55,55-250,50, these three heads are commonly known as the three treasures of the poor, and the optical quality is better than 18-135 and 18-200, after all, the zoom ratio of more than 3 will have different degrees of image quality decline. But it's more troublesome to change heads for travel.

2. The other is 18-135, 18-200 is not recommended, because the quality of 18-200 is too poor and expensive to die, I really don't want to say more, the advantage of this one is that one shot goes all over the world, and it is very convenient to travel.

Needless to say, 50 is a must-have for beginners, with a large aperture and a fixed focus, and it's still very cheap. Anyway, let's get into one...

In terms of imaging, 18-135 and 18-200 belong to the same grade, and 18-55 and 55-250 are slightly better than the first two).

In the case of the auxiliary factory, there are also two options:

3. One is still a mirror to go all over the world, the 18-200 of Tamron and Sigma are very cheap, not worse than the original factory, if the original 18-135 is not enough, you can choose the deputy factory. But keep in mind that the imaging quality of any lens that goes all over the world will be relatively poor, because in principle, the larger the zoom ratio, the worse the image quality.

4. If you want a professional large aperture and high image quality and don't want to spend a lot of money to buy a red circle, I recommend Tamron's 17-50 VC, that is, B005, my current configuration is Canon 60D+B005. If the telephoto end is not enough, you can also add the 55-250 I just mentioned to supplement, and the image quality will not disappoint you.

**No problem, I've been playing with the camera for two or three years, and all the lenses are bought from**. I don't recommend it for specific stores.,Lest you say I'm advertising.,If you want to know, you can PM me privately.。

1. These two are almost the same, there is no essential difference, depending on the mood.

135 bar, the set is easy to use, and the sub-factory lens affects the focusing speed and accuracy.

3. It's okay, this kind of lens is selected according to money, and it's not worth thinking about all kinds of comparisons.

4. **Forget it, JD.com or Amazon.

Choose Canon's original 18-135, Tenglong's vertical branch is a tourist lens and do not prevent the rest of the shed from shaking, the original 18-135 can already meet your early photography needs!