-
First of all, none of you are experts. It's a place where we can learn from each other, have fun and make progress together.
For your situation, my suggestion is that since you don't care about the shoulder screen, electronic products should be bought new or not old, and if you choose one of the two, 700d. Here's why:
D compared with the previous XXD series of products has undergone great changes, starting from this 60D, it is no longer a metal body, and the leather performance of the previous mid-range SLR, such as waterproof, dustproof, and anti-drop characteristics are questionable. My feeling is that if you want to buy a 60D, it is better to buy a 50D to play, which is at least a mid-range SLR.
2. Both of these machines are 18 million pixels, both have shooting functions, and there is no important difference in the basics, but ** is still 700d cheaper, so the cost performance is a little better. But if you're really not picky, the current 650D may be more cost-effective than the 700D.
3. The fuselage is eliminated quickly, and it will change in a few years, there is no need to seem to get a one-step look, the key is the choice of lenses, and more importantly, the improvement of one's photographic literacy. Improve yourself first with cost-effective products, and it's not too late to change the fuselage in the future.
One more thing to add: you like to shoot big scenes, but both of these machines are APS-C spec digital SLRs, and the actual focal length of the lens must be multiplied by the coefficient, so the lens recommends that in addition to your 15-85 lens, you can also consider a light angle lens, such as 12-24 or something. In this way, even if you multiply the coefficient, the actual wide-angle focal length can be in the range of 19 38, which is enough for general wide-angle shooting.
-
If you're willing to pay 70d, there's plenty of choice.
The 70D is a pretty good DSLR, and the corresponding Nikon D7100 is also quite good. In addition, Nikon now D7000 is quite good value for money.
-
7d。。。Except for the poor APSC format and image quality (and full-frame ratio), it's perfect. Workmanship, framing, focusing, continuous shooting, control, not to mention a double-digit machine like 60D, even the most expensive machines such as entry-level full-frame 5D2 and 6D cannot be compared.
If you're concerned about these aspects and don't want to be very critical about image quality, 7D is a great choice. But it is still a bit bulky for ordinary household use, you can buy 60d or wait for 70d, **cheaper, and more portable. In fact, if you play amateurly, 650d is very good, don't buy a pullover, buy a 15-85 or a new 18-135 stm
-
I use 7D myself, and it feels completely adequate and very easy to use. It feels very good.,The function is not outdated.,Equipped with a 50 play first.。 I will buy a wide angle one after another.
The reason why 60D was eliminated is not in terms of functionality, this type of mid-range machine is definitely enough for amateur players. The main thing is that it's too feminine. Hehe, we're still a bit machismo.
-
7D's focus point is still OK,Although 60D came out late,But it's not as easy to use as 7D.,People are dual-chip processing.,No matter what, it's also a flagship machine of style.。 You get what you pay for.
-
Compared with 60D, of course, 7D is better, and the smaller the number of Canon's SLRs, the better, regardless of whether it is new or old, the more important thing is the brain behind the machine.
-
60D is one gear lower than 7D, but the time to come out is also later than 7D, that is, 60D is relatively new, and on the whole, 60D is more cost-effective
-
7D takes a long time to come out, but the handling is not a little higher than 60D, the focus point, viewfinder frame, and processor are all only available on the 1D series, and it is a magnesium aluminum alloy body, shutter 150,000 times. 60D is just a mid-range machine, engineering plastic, 100,000 shutter speeds, not cost-effective, except for the flip screen, almost no big difference with 50D. Many professional photographers choose 7D instead of 5D2 when shooting high-speed moving objects, but the image quality of 7D is average, the film is not sharp, and post-processing is required.
The most important thing in taking pictures is focusing, the focus is aligned, the picture will be clear, and 7D is the best in focusing!
-
How often does money buy 7d, and if less, buy 60d. You get what you pay for.
See the instructions on focusing in the manual. The manual of the SLR is very important. Another is to practice more.
Merit. 1.The imaging quality is high, although the number of diagonal points is not much, but they are all relatively accurate, especially the ** focus point, which is an eight-way double cross, with high focusing accuracy, and the tracking and shooting of moving objects is very clear. >>>More
I've been in this business for six or seven years, and if you're a beginner, it's recommended not to pay too much attention to the function of the fuselage, because the performance of the two fuselages you mentioned should be able to meet your requirements. If you are not short of money, it is recommended to go to 7d, otherwise it is recommended to go to 50d. Because I once evaluated 50d, I know more about its performance. >>>More
I just bought back 60d, and I was very entangled before I bought it, so I deeply understand that the landlord is now choosing a difficult situation. >>>More
Alas, the experts did not get to the point at all: this is the product of two companies. >>>More