We have the 4th generation fighter, so when will the aircraft carrier be available???

If nothing else, it will be tested in 2011.

Wait, there will be in the near future.

Lao Wahang's mother may be launched this year, and the army should be at least 2 years later.

Speaking of which, the aircraft carrier should officially meet the Chinese people earlier than the fourth-generation aircraft! The J20 is now only a prototype, and it should be several years away from the real finalization, but now the Varyag aircraft carrier in Dalian is almost refitted, and the most optimistic is that it is expected to be launched in 2011 and seaworthy, and it should be the first to be put into use in the South China Sea Fleet! In addition, according to foreign reports, there are two 60,000-ton aircraft carriers under construction in Shanghai, but some people say that this news is fake!

Alas, who knows when the domestic aircraft carrier will come out! Don't worry, don't you worry, didn't J20 come out when you say it, maybe the PLA Navy dragged an aircraft carrier out of the underground base that day! When the time came, everyone was shocked again!

Haha...

Varyag's words, within five years.

J20? Maybe it's not a final.

Aircraft carriers are being built.

Strictly speaking, our fourth-generation aircraft will not be able to enter service until 10 years later, and the aircraft carrier is under construction.

The old tile will be built within 2 years, and the domestic one will not be built until at least 2020.

Soon! As long as we wait for others to release the 5th generation machine, we will have the 4th generation machine.

In 5 years, there will be aircraft carriers (most likely not self-made, China's industrial level is not so high, it is impossible to build aircraft carriers, and steel is not for sale, unless it uses the "civilian ship" standard like the UK).

Fourth-generation aircraft, you just wait, it is impossible for more than ten years.

China is not great!!

It will certainly take 10 years at the earliest before the initial combat effectiveness can be formed.

As for the 4th generation aircraft, referring to the J10, 97 years ago, various versions of the J-10** began to flood the network, and it was not until 10 years later that it was officially unveiled. So it should be about the same time as the aircraft carrier has initial combat effectiveness.

If the former Soviet aircraft carrier Varyag, which was purchased from Ukraine, is converted and put into service in the rear, it will take at least 5-6 years for the domestic aircraft carrier to be manufactured and launched into service to be combat-capable. Fourth-generation aircraft should come out a little earlier than aircraft carriers, but it is still unknown whether China's fourth-generation aircraft will be capable of fighting the F-35 and F-22.

Aircraft carriers are coming soon, they are already being built, it will take 3 5 years, and as for the four generations to equip the troops within 10 years, it is only authoritative sources.

To be honest, it's not easy to have an aircraft carrier! The main problem with having an aircraft carrier is whether you can afford it!

As for when! It depends on the face of ***! When he gives a lot of military spending, we will have an aircraft carrier!

4. With a machine, do you mean the American standard or the Russian standard? American standards have not yet come out in 10-15 years! We already have Russian standards! J-10 Raptor fighter.

The improved version of the J-10 is a reluctant 4th generation aircraft, and if China already has an aircraft carrier, he will not say it.

Even if China has good things, he will also hide the tucked aircraft carrier, which theoretically should already be there, but it is just not to say.

When everyone has a fourth-generation aircraft, it will be enough It seems that many countries have aircraft carriers.

Although our great motherland does not have aircraft carriers, we can prevent aircraft carrier attacks, and our missile interception technology is the best of the best, and we can prevent aircraft carrier attacks.

Yes, yes, but at that time China had already been included in other territories.

When the Chinese men's football team goes to the World Cup.

You will see it on the 70th National Day.

Hehe! Don't worry too much! Bread will be there! Just wait and there will be and everything will be fine.

Bread will be there!

Aircraft carriers will also have them.

It's just a matter of time.

When we look forward to the production of these high-end products in China, as a part of China, what contribution have we made to the birth of these products?

To have an aircraft carrier is to have a heavy baggage.

It's very simple high school physics.

When air resistance is not taken into account.

vt=v0+at

x=vot+1 2AT2 is pre-existing.

t=bring in vt=

So the aircraft carrier vmin = 60-51 = 9m s

It is said that among the options is the Russian Su-33 fighter, and the Su-33 fighter is the only Russian carrier-based aircraft that has reached the practical level. The Su-33 is also currently the only heavy carrier-based fighter equipped in the world. In the past few years, it has been rumored that China and Russia have reached an agreement to import 14 improved Su-33s for aircraft carrier aircraft training, so as the Varyag aircraft carrier, more people speculate that it will be used to train pilots of Chinese carrier-based aircraft.

As a training ship, it prepares for the birth of China's independent aircraft carrier. The second is the improved version of J-10, but because J-10 is a light fighter, his position in the Chinese Air Force is mainly to form a high and low match with Su-27 and Su-30, and play a low role, so the author believes that the existing performance of J-10 alone is not enough to meet the needs of aircraft carriers to seize future air supremacy, and a better way is to have Su-33 and J-10 on the aircraft carrierOn the one hand, it relies on the advanced nature of the Su-33 to protect the air supremacy of its aircraft carrier, and on the other hand, it can also be used as training to improve the performance of the J-10 in actual combat, paving the way for the next generation of domestically produced advanced aircraft.

This has always been China's two-legged approach to military strategy. At the same time, because the Varyag aircraft carrier can carry up to 50 aircraft, and the aircraft carrier needs to be equipped with a certain number of early warning aircraft and other types of aircraft, it is now said that the most likely to be selected is Russia's Ka-31 early warning ***, the combat radius is only more than 100 kilometers, the detection distance is only more than 200 kilometers, and the air stay time is more than 2 hours, compared with its foreign aircraft carriers, the strength gap is very large. All of the above can show that the Varyag is unlikely to become the flagship of the main fleet of the Chinese Navy, at most a training ship, training the talents needed for the new aircraft carrier with more advanced domestic performance, and **.

Of course, it is our own copycat SU33 carrier-based aircraft with imported Ka31 early warning ***.

I think the J-10 is unlikely After all, single-engine fighters are not too reliable at sea Generally, carrier-based aircraft are twin-engined...

J15 heavy carrier-based aircraft, JI0 carrier-based aircraft, Ka-31 early warning***.

The United States has once again made big news, revealing China's medium-sized aircraft carrier plan. Claimed to be equipped with electromagnetic catapults and stealth unmanned carrier-based aircraft, how many pounds and taels is the strength of this 10,000-ton giant ship?

From 2017 to 2019, China will develop a new generation of turbofan engines, and I estimate that it will not be installed in aircraft until 2020 at the earliest.

Do you think that our third-generation aircraft have just entered service, and the fourth-generation aircraft may enter service so soon? There is no trace of the fourth-generation aircraft of the Soviets so far, which shows that the technology of the fourth-generation aircraft is very complex and profound. The most optimistic estimates are that the Chinese fourth-generation aircraft will enter service in 2020.

The J-14 fighter designed by China's Shenyang Aircraft Factory. Now it is a test flight. It is estimated to be finalized in 2010. If all goes well, mass production around 2012 and equipping the troops.

Our country's tradition has always been "production generation, development generation, pre-research generation", according to this statement——— J10 has come out, and the new generation of domestic fighters should be in full swing of development, in short, it is not far away

We Chinese are very low-key, and it is difficult to say whether there is one.

Generally between 300 meters and 350, up to 85 fighters.

They are all taxiing and taking off, and you should be asking about [catapult take-off] and [glide take-off] or [glide take-off].

Catapult takeoff] advantages: the aircraft does not need to be headwind when taking off, and it can also take off against the wind. Heavy aircraft can be ejected, and the aircraft can be lifted into the air with a maximum take-off load. Minimize the distance you run.

Disadvantages: The steam catapult technology is complex, the weight and volume itself are huge, and the daily maintenance is not easy. The manufacturing process is also demanding.

Glide Jump Takeoff] or Glide Jump Takeoff

Advantages: simple technology, small mass and small footprint (a ramp at the end of the take-off runway is sufficient).

Disadvantages: heavy aircraft (such as fixed-wing AWACS aircraft) cannot take off, and heavy fighters cannot rise into the air to fight with the maximum take-off load, which affects the comprehensive combat performance.

Those who have the conditions want to take off by catapult, so that they can take off and land large aircraft such as AWACS aircraft, transport planes, anti-submarine aircraft, etc. on aircraft carriers, and the carrying capacity of the aircraft is not limited. The utilization of the deck is also better than that of a skid take-off. The disadvantage is that the technology is difficult, and at present, only the United States has catapult technology in the world, and the French Charles de Gaulle-class aircraft carrier also bought American catapults.

The glide jump take-off technique is less difficult, suitable for small and medium-sized aircraft carriers, but cannot take off and land large aircraft, and the weight of fighters is also limited. The aircraft carriers of the former Soviet Union were subject to this and had to use *** as early warning aircraft, and their combat performance was greatly reduced.

Catapult takes off quickly, but the life of the aircraft is also reduced, and vice versa.

This is nothing to feel about, not for quite some time.

The first is that the catapult has not yet been figured out, and it has not yet been decided whether it is electromagnetic or steam, and it is said that it is walking on two legs, and it is not known who will come out first.

Secondly, with the catapult, you have to have a flat deck. The current old tile, as well as the rumored domestic ones, are all said to be the sliding deck with a warped mouth, and there is no ground safety with catapults, and the cost of changing the deck is too great to be drawn.

Now we are still in the study period, first of all, learn how to organize, use, and command a complete aircraft carrier formation, let's just think of them as a driving school practice car, we have always solved the problem first, and then solve the problem of good or bad.

This is not in a hurry, it is estimated that it will have to wait until the second batch of self-built aircraft carriers come out, at that time carrier-based aircraft, early warning aircraft, anti-submarine aircraft, catapults are neatly organized, and the technical stability is not sparse.

This is not in a hurry, we have too many courses to fall behind, and we can't become a big fat man in one go, and it is easy to choke, so we have to make up for it slowly.

The aircraft carrier catapult system is mainly steam catapult and electromagnetic catapult, and steam catapult requires the fighter to have a small weight and fast acceleration. Domestic.

All types of fighters are generally on the heavy side. Moreover, the steam catapult consumes too much fresh water, and the practical efficiency is not high. On the contrary, domestic electromagnetic catapults.

The technology is relatively advanced, and the popularization of magnetic levitation technology has accumulated a lot of experience for military electromagnetic catapult. Follow this path for another 3-5 years.

can come up with a better solution. The ejection of the aircraft carrier is not the key, the landing is the difficulty, and the magnetic induction can effectively tow.

The speed at which the aircraft lands is also a big plus.

First of all, it is necessary to solve the problem of carrier-based fighters, carrier-based aircraft that can be effectively used in order to make the aircraft carrier combat-effective, the Varyag is a gliding deck, which should take off without a catapult, and if there is a catapult, it will speed up the take-off. The aircraft carrier is a huge system project, and all kinds of system projects must be tested before they can be put into use, and it seems that the Varyag will take many more time, so everyone should continue to care.

It is impossible for the fighter to eject for the time being, and the current Varyag uses a glide take-off, and no steam catapult is installed, and it is not possible to obtain steam catapult capabilities at least until the next Chinese domestic aircraft carrier. Steam catapult is really useful, it can reduce the restriction on the take-off weight of carrier-based aircraft, so it can increase the bomb load and fuel load, increase the range combat radius and improve the strike capability, and at the same time, the steam catapult can also catapult fixed-wing ship AWACS aircraft.

At least it will take a year and a half, and the combat effectiveness will be five years (no actual combat, no experience.) There is still some effect, to deter some restless factors in the vicinity.

I really don't understand this kind of national defense matter.