Who is better with Ka50 or Apache?? 20

Personally, I think Apache and Ka 50 are on par. Apache's practical ceiling, battery life is dominant, Apache's practical ceiling is 6400 meters, the endurance time is 3 hours and 9 minutes, and the Ka50's ceiling is 5000 meters, and the endurance time is 1 hour and 40 minutes.

And the Ka-50 has a maximum take-off weight and maximum speed. And the range has an advantage, the Ka-50 has a maximum take-off weight of 10800kg and a maximum speed of 310km....The maximum speed of the Apache is 296km....

Maximum take-off weight 9252kg....The Ka-50 has a range of 550km, while the Apache has only 482km

It's pretty much the same in terms of **. The Apache can carry 16 anti-tank missiles. And the Ka-50 can carry only 12 anti-tank missiles. It is possible that the newest Apache, the longbow Apache, has an advantage in terms of electronics.

In terms of survival, card 50 is better. The Ka50 was the first in the world to equip an ejection seat. Increase pilot productivity. You can refer to it yourself.

It should be about the same. In terms of electronics, it is definitely the Apache that is a little better.

However, I personally feel that the Ka-50 is a little stronger than the Apache in terms of appearance.

Of course, Apache has the upper hand. The coaxial twin rotors of the Ka50 determine the physical limitations of its maneuvering, and it is precisely because of this potential risk of collision between the upper and lower rotors that Maozi himself does not have the Ka50 installed. The advantage of apache in strike capability is too great, because it is the only armed *** equipped with millimeter-wave radar, no one can compare in target detection ability, with advanced helfire missiles, anti-armor capabilities are very strong.

Personally, I think that the card is 50The Ka50 can maintain its balance even if the tail is destroyed

Personally, I think Apache and Ka 50 are on par.

Apache There are many models of each, and each has its own merits! Personally, I'm still bullish on Apache!

It's amazing.

Apache *** survivability is very strong, its rotor adopts a fiberglass reinforced multi-beam stainless steel front section and a honeycomb sandwich core rear section design coated with FRP skin, which has been proved by live firing that any point of this rotor blade is hit by a 12 7 mm gun, it generally does not cause structural damage, and can continue to perform the task. The fuselage uses a traditional skin-bulkhead-elongated structure, and any part of its 95 surface is hit by a 23-mm shell, and it is still guaranteed to continue flying for 30 minutes. The front and rear cockpits were armored to withstand 23-mm shells.

The key parts of the two engines are also protected by armor, and the middle fuselage is separated, and the two are far apart, if one engine is hit and damaged, there is also one that can continue to work to ensure flight safety. Improving the survivability of the troops is equivalent to improving the combat efficiency of the troops and the combat effectiveness of the troops.

Yes, it is currently the best armed force with comprehensive performance, and the unique millimeter-wave radar and the superior performance of the Haierfa missile give the Apache a powerful attack power.

Awesome, one can wipe out a tank company.

If you want to be more powerful, you still have to wait for jagm.,That's not awesome but terrifying.。

The Ka-50 "gimmick" is the world's first single-seat close-range attack developed by the Russian Kamov Science and Technology Complex (formerly Changmov Experimental Design Bureau). As Russia's next-generation anti-tank, the Ka-50 can also perform anti-submarine, search and rescue, electronic reconnaissance and other missions. The design of the aircraft was finalized in 1997, the prototype made its first flight in July 1982, and deliveries began in 1991.

AH 64 "Apache" is an advanced attack developed by McDonnell Douglas (formerly Hughes) in the United States, and is still the main aircraft of the United States, which represents the technological level of the United States in the 80s, and is also one of the most technologically advanced, most powerful and most expensive attacks in the world today. The machine can perform anti-tank missions day and night in adverse weather conditions, and has strong combat, life-saving and survivability capabilities. The prototype made its first flight in September 1975 and was delivered in January 1984.

The aircraft participated in the Panama War and the Gulf War, and performed well in the war, showing excellent combat capability.

In terms of technology and combat performance, of the two types of ***, the Ka-50*** is more advanced.

Who can hit card 52? Russian experts pointed out that the strongest opponent, the American Apache, unexpectedly fell off the list.

I think the card 52 has many performance features, ** is not expensive, and the reason why it is still not as good as Apache is that the quality performance is not very good.

Maybe he will be lacking in endurance and ammunition loading, and the introduction of this ** in their country will definitely be due to many considerations.

The Ka-52 has maintained a rather hesitant attitude, as Egypt has introduced the Ka-52 at the same time as the Apache of the United States.

If there is a real combat test between the two, it is not the decisive role of the first, but the battlefield technology of the main body of the operation.

Although the card 52 has so many features, and it is not expensive, it is still a little worse in terms of quality.

Although the card 52 is not expensive in terms of performance or **, it will be a little lacking compared to Apache.

Nothing is all-encompassing, and no matter how powerful the air supremacy is, it is useless.

The Ka-52 was hesitant, but Egypt was bringing in the Apache of the United States at the same time as the Ka-52.