There is a debate in our class, and there is a small debate going on in the class

I agree that primary school students should pay attention to their appearance, because paying attention to their appearance can make people feel that they are not sloppy, but also make people feel that they love to be clean and tidy.

Pay attention to the image of the meter.

1 What we call paying attention to the image is not the phenomenon of wearing famous brands, fancy clothes, and comparisons, but a kind of self-temperament, which we should accompany from an early age, dress neatly, generously, dignified, show a good image of ourselves, and the good demeanor of primary school students.

2 With the further development of society, our material life is becoming more and more abundant, within our economic affordability, we can choose the clothes that suit our liking, which is also a kind of self-character.

Summary. Hello dear, you can say: square four arguments:

I believe that one should essentially accept one's own individuality and not become socially fit into society like a group. Although people share common values, beliefs and ethics, it is inevitable that each person has his or her own identity. A person's personality determines his way of thinking and ability to deal with problems, as well as his relationship with society.

Therefore, people who do not fit in should not change themselves, but should learn how to make reasonable use of their own characteristics to communicate effectively with the surrounding social environment. Making proper use of one's personality traits can help to enhance one's abilities and expand one's social network. The expression of personality can effectively promote interpersonal communication, thus creating a harmonious social environment.

Therefore, people who do not fit in should not change, but learn to make reasonable use of their individuality, so as to better integrate into society and progress together with society.

Recently, I was going to participate in a debate competition in my class, debating whether I should change if I don't fit in, and how to write the debate essay.

Hello dear, you can say: I think that a person should essentially accept his own individuality, rather than change his or her roots to adapt to society like a group.

Although people share common values, beliefs, and ethics, it is inevitable that each person has his or her own identity. A person's personality determines his way of thinking and ability to deal with problems, as well as his relationship with society. Therefore, people who do not fit in should not change themselves, but should learn how to make reasonable use of their own characteristics to communicate effectively with the surrounding social environment.

Making proper use of one's personality traits can help to enhance one's abilities and expand one's social network. The expression of personality can effectively promote interpersonal communication, thus creating a harmonious social environment. Therefore, people who do not fit in should not change, but learn to make reasonable use of their personal integrity, so as to better integrate into society and make progress together with society.

We are change.

Dear, you can change it appropriately.

Because this is the same thing.

Okay thanks, do you have any examples of the disadvantages of not changing.

Okay pro. You can say: an example is not to change your beliefs about yourself.

When people do not think about their beliefs and do not seek new insights, they may fall into the extreme and narrow concept of religious belief and fail to recognize the possibilities outside.

Are there any examples of misfit failures.

Hello dear, this situation is not uncommon in the actual use of chiropractic. In interpersonal interactions, people who don't fit in can be ostracized and are more likely to fail. For example, if a community has some rigid rules, and a misfit person is unwilling to fully follow them, he may fail because other members of the Great Confessional Sect may refuse to accept him, or he may lack cooperation in the community and will not be taken seriously, and will not be able to achieve Cheng Bi Gong in the end.

In words I can't argue with that.

But if it is realistic, it should be possible to make a certain argument.

People are old and fine, you can use people to refute, there is an old family, if there is a treasure, the old man is not as wise as the child, the child will be greater than the old, the fittest survive, the unfit are eliminated, since the big fish can live until now, do you think the big fish is simple-minded or cunning? It is really not good to use the example of Zhu Yuanzhang as an analogy, after Zhu Yuanzhang became the emperor, he consolidated the throne through a series of means, although the means are a bit brutal, but how can it be said to be proud? This also shows that the big fish has the capital to bully the small fish, even if you are a small fish, how can you take the big fish?

To be a small fish is to be bullied by a big fish, and to be a big fish you can do whatever you want, do you think it is better to be a big fish or a small fish? At the same time, how can Zhu Yuanzhang defeat Zhang Shicheng say that he is a small fish? Since Zhang Shicheng can be defeated, everyone knows who Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhang Shicheng are Xiaoyu, right?

Just ask, can a small fish outperform a big fish? Besides, it's not an exaggeration to compare people to world hegemons, right? It's okay to compare people to big fish, right?

According to what the other party said, this big fish is proud and complacent, wouldn't it be better not to be a man?

Arguments:

Hello friends on the other side, our view is that our class is a united class, for the following reasons: First, our class has a common name, that is, a certain grade and a certain class, the students of our class are sincerely united, the class declines, the class is honored, and the class advances and retreats together, and the last and most important thing is...

It's terrible This is a debate question that a teacher who has no common sense of debate came up with, and it doesn't let both sides have something to say at all.

Such a debate is too much for the opposing side...

In this case, the square actually ran to the Internet to defend himself, and he was really speechless.

The argument can be made from the following aspects:

1. Knowledge is power, and learning helps us increase our skills and broaden our knowledge.

2. We understand that the most effective and common way to master a thing is to learn, and there is learning in doing everything imperceptibly.

3. Learning advanced technology to promote scientific and technological progress, learning good systems to promote social civilization, China's current socialist system with Chinese characteristics is innovative on the basis of learning from the West.

4. In addition to the knowledge learned, learning is also about the cultivation and exercise of our ability in the subtle way, which is a kind of improvement of internal cultivation.

5. Do things with a humble attitude of learning, and promote a person's long-term progress, as is the individual, and the development of the country is also the same (value advocacy).

In addition, we will illustrate this with examples.

1. Students learn knowledge and master methods, from young children to mature youth, we have been learning.

2. The development of society is inseparable from learning, political learning, and learning good behavior.

Originality: Knowledge is the ladder of human progress, and learning is to obtain knowledge.

Looking at the society in a blink of an eye, there are so many unfairness and so many fraud incidents in the world, all because they don't understand why they should be fair, and what if they are for their own selfish interests, they still think: people are not for themselves, and heaven and earth will be destroyed. Learning is not only for your own work and life in the future, but also to change this society.

Oops, I can't think of it all at once, you can assume that you are the opposite, and then give me the questions against the positive side, and I will help you dismiss them one by one.

Learning can enrich our knowledge and enrich our brains.