Was Qin Shi Huang a good king in history?

Updated on history 2024-04-06
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The quality of a king cannot be judged by just one or a few bad things, and Qin Shi Huang, as the first emperor in Chinese history, has no need to say his merits. Unification of the six countries, unification of the currency, etc., but there are also a few things that are not very good, such as book burning and pit Confucianism. The construction of the Great Wall can be a meritorious deed.

    Generally speaking, he is not a good emperor in some sense, but he is an emperor of great significance to Chinese history!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    From a traditional point of view, although Qin Shi Huang unified the six kingdoms, cultivated the Dao, unified coins, unified rails and weights and measures, and established a system for thousands of years, he made great contributions to China. But all along, his image of a tyrant has also been widely circulated, and he has even become a spokesman for tyrants.

    But lately, a lot of different views have begun to emerge. For example, in his "True Qin Shi Huang", Cheng Bu came to the conclusion that Qin Shi Huang was a benevolent monarch through the scrutiny of the "Historical Records", and at the same time, in the study of the No. 3 pit of the Qin Warriors, some scholars concluded that the Terracotta Warriors and Horses were not the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, which also drew a question mark for the tyrant.

    Therefore, Qin Shi Huang is estimated to be the most difficult emperor in history.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It has to be evaluated from two aspects. 1.He unified the six kingdoms and put an end to the division of the princes.

    It can be regarded as meritorious. 2.He burned books to pit Confucianism, resulting in unclear historical facts at that time.

    There were. However, the construction of the Great Wall is difficult to evaluate, and everyone resented it at the time, but now it is a symbol of China.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Historically, there have been mixed reviews.

    But the first emperor of the ages is recognized.

    What is the standard of a good emperor?

    I think from a historical point of view, he was a good emperor, and I won't list the great achievements, but everyone knows it.

    But from the point of view of the people at that time, he was extremely sinful, and he raised troops year after year, and it was not easy to unify him.

    Once in a hurry, he spent extravagantly and indiscriminately killed innocents.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It depends on what angle you look at ... But from a fair point of view. He should be a good monarch ... At the very least, it's a mixed bag.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Not. But it is also a big bull to destroy the six countries, unify the world, and centralize power.

    But he was very brutal and unreasonable, and the people were in dire straits.

    Go and see Du Mu's A Fang Gongfu.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The early and middle stages are, the late stage is a bit of Alzheimer's, and in general, yes!

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    He is a person of merit and demerits.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Are you debating or writing.

    This has to be said in two ways: first, the reunification of the motherland that he promoted, the Great Wall he built, and second, he was a tyrant.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Qin Shi Huang was the first person in China to unify China, not only to unify China, but also to unify the Chinese language, Chinese institutions such as weights and measures. None of China's past kings surpassed him.

    He was a good king, a man who really did things, not just a man who said but didn't do things.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    You can't just describe a king by using good or bad things, at least he has made a lot of contributions

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Yes, he unified China, and no one in the world has such a feat.

    The king is also a good emperor. According to the history books, he is huge and beautiful

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    From Qin Shi Huang's own point of view, as a feudal king, what he did was only to strengthen his own rule, tyrannical and cruel, and to evaluate a king, often from his historical point of view, Qin Shi Huang was the first to unify China, and the Qin Dynasty also left a rich history and culture, which is indispensable.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The kings before Qin Shi Huang were:

    1: Qin Xiaogong (361 BC-338 BC, reigned 24 years) Yingquliang, during his time abroad, he adopted the Shang Dynasty Transformation Method, which laid the foundation for the strength of the Qin State.

    2: King Huiwen of Qin (338 BC-311 BC, reigned for 27 years) Yingsi, ascended the throne at the age of nineteen, destroyed the nine clans of Shang Marting, and did not abolish the law of Shang Marting. In 325 BC, he proclaimed himself King of Qin, the first king of Qin.

    Zhang Yi assisted in the six countries. The northern expedition to Yiqu, the west of Bashu, the winter out of the Han Valley, the south to the business. Lay a solid foundation for Qin's unification of China.

    The Son of Heaven committed the same crime as the common people, that is, when Yingsi was the crown prince. killed someone, Shang Ying immediately punished the crown prince and Taifu Yingqian with criminal law and sentenced him to death.

    3: King Wu of Qin (311-307 BC, reigned for 6 years) Yingdang, the son of King Huiwen of Qin, raised the crown in the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, smashed his muscles and bones, and died of exhaustion. He was 23 years old.

    4: King Zhaoxiang of Qin (306 BC-251 BC, reigned 56 years) Yingji, the half-brother of King Wu of Qin. In the early days, he was a hostage in the Yan Kingdom, and his mother Empress Dowager Xuan (Mi Bazi, Mi Yue), his uncle Wei Ran, Marquis Wei Ran, Huayang Jun Mi Rong, worshiped Fan Yan as the prime minister, and adopted the strategy of distant friendship and close merit, laying the foundation for the victory of the Qin Unification War.

    The general rose in vain. >5: King Xiaowen of Qin (reigned 3 days from 250 BC to 250 BC) Yingzhu, the second son of King Zhaoxiang. Due to the long reign of King Zhaoxiang, the eldest son had died when he was on the throne of the crown prince, and the second son An Guojun (when King Zhaoxiang was in power, Yingzhu was named An Guojun).

    Reigned for 3 days and died mysteriously.

    6: King Xiang of Qin Zhuang (249-247 BC, reigned for 3 years) won Chu, also known as Zichu, Yiren. Son of King Hyowen.

    In his early years, he was a hostage in Handan, Zhao State. With the assistance of Lü Buwei, Yiren was introduced to Lady Huayang (the empress of King Xiaowen), who had no children. Aliens are heirs.

    He was renamed Zichu, and was later made the crown prince by King Xiaowen.

    Take Lü Buwei's concubine, Zhao Ji. Born in Handan. Zi Chu is the queen mother's biological mother is the Empress Dowager Xia, and the adoptive mother Mrs. Huayang is the Empress Dowager Huayang, and Lü Buwei is appointed as the prime minister. At this time, Zhao Guo returned Zhao Ji's mother and son (Yingzheng mother and son) to Qin.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The previous king of Qin Shi Huang was King Xiang of Qin Zhuang.

    King Xiang of Qinzhuang, surnamed Ying, Qin or Zhao, named Chu, a native of Xianyang, Yongzhou. The monarch of Qin during the Warring States Period, the son of King Xiaowen of Qin, and the father of Qin Shi Huang. Zichu entered Handan in Zhao State in his early years as a proton.

    Married Zhao Ji and gave birth to Qin Shi Huang. With the help of Lü Buwei, he became the monarch of the Qin State and eradicated the remnants of the royal family of the Zhou Dynasty. King Zhuang Xiang died of illness in May of the third year of Chinese New Year's Eve, and was nicknamed Zhuang Xiang. After his son Qin Shi Huang established the Qin Dynasty, he posthumously crowned Emperor Taishang.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    King Xiang of Qin Zhuang (281 BC 247 BC), also known as King Qin Zhuang, was the monarch of Qin at the end of the Warring States Period. In the pre-Qin period, men were called by their names but not by their surnames. Although it is surnamed Ying, it is not called Yingchu.

    The son of King Qin Xiaowen. His real name is Inhuman. He once worked as a proton in Handan, Zhao State, and later became the monarch of Qin State with the help of Lü Buwei.

    His son Qin Shi Huang posthumously crowned him as the Emperor after destroying the Six Kingdoms and calling him the emperor's honorific title.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    King Xiang of Qin Zhuang "Zi Chu" is the father of Qin Shi Huang.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Ren Yun Wang Ji Yan reigned for 59 years from BC314 to BC256.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    In terms of merit, Qin Shi Huang was a brilliant monarch, but from a political point of view, Qin Shi Huang can be said to be a tyrant. Qin Shi Huang unified the six kingdoms, and unified the written word and currency, which promoted the development of society.

    However, after ruling the Six Kingdoms, Qin Shi Huang began to take a series of actions in order to consolidate his power, among which the burning of books and Confucianism has always been despised by later generations.

    Qin Shi Huang personally destroyed a lot of books, and many cultures have not been passed down, and until now we have a very vague history before the Qin Dynasty. There is no way to know the specific details of the life of the ancients at that time, and the information that has been handed down is also beneficial to the Qin Dynasty.

Related questions
12 answers2024-04-06

As the saying goes, "history is a little girl who dresses up". Whether Qin Shi Huang is a Ming monarch or an immortal tyrant is a matter of opinion. In my heart, Qin Shi Huang was not a perfect person, and he also had shortcomings. >>>More

29 answers2024-04-06

Mainly because it happened so suddenly, the guards hadn't reacted yet, and some of the guards reacted, but they were killed by Jing Ke.

10 answers2024-04-06

In the peasant uprising at the end of the Ming Dynasty, there was a man named Cao Cao. and Li Zicheng. But it seems that this Cao Cao still has his real name"Luo Rucai". >>>More

10 answers2024-04-06

We understand history, read a person's history, and don't look at his achievements and deeds. >>>More

7 answers2024-04-06

A famous general of Wei in the early Warring States period, with outstanding military talent, but narrow-minded in character and jealousy. >>>More