-
We understand history, read a person's history, and don't look at his achievements and deeds.
This is mainly due to the fact that today's textbooks are all encroaching on the good side, but there is no mention of the dark side, which makes the education we have received since childhood like a cramming education.
Therefore, why does a certain cow say: only by entering the society, that is the most profound course.
From a peasant to a common man, to a leading figure and even the supreme ruler, who can not have a few shady incidents? But in the textbooks we grew up with, there were only their achievements, only their great achievements, so when we worship them, we also give them the best honorable title.
And when we learn the truth of history, we are at a loss and ask: Is this true? Is there really such a thing? Why is it not mentioned in the book? We felt lost.
Well, that's all there is to it, it depends on your ability to think whether LZ understands it or not. ,
-
No. Qin Shi Huang's actions were an inevitable choice under the social conditions of the time.
-
It's a tyrant, that's right. But he was neither faint nor incompetent.
-
Zu Long is the best person in the history of China, it seems that there is no one! Every genius always has shortcomings, every character has historical limitations, and it is very good that the characters of more than 2000 years ago can be like this, Qin Yingzheng, Julius Caesar. A character like no other.
-
However, the rulers of later generations were all Confucians, and the first emperor was a Legalist, so of course the evaluation is not high.
-
Yes, but I have nothing against his approach. These are all things that the monarch did to consolidate his dominance. Understandable.
-
Take a look at Nan Huaijin's book "Original University Micro Words", there is a paragraph called "A Tyrant of Pity through the Ages", in which the evaluation of Qin Shihuang is more pertinent.
-
Qin Shi Huang was an outstanding statesman, strategist, and reformer in ancient China, a political figure who completed the unification of China for the first time, and was also the first monarch in China to be called emperor.
-
Was Qin Shi Huang a tyrant?
-
Is a tyrant really a tyrant?
Qin Shi Huang "passed" big. In the era of Qin Shi Huang, the Chinese nation has had a history and culture of thousands of years. As the forerunner of the era, we should advocate freedom of thought, and that will definitely make a great contribution. >>>More
Qin Quanqian" - a symbol of Qin Shi Huang's unified currency Regarding the power of money, as early as the Qing Jiadao period, Dai Xi (Chunshi) recorded it in the "Guquan Conghua". Bao Kang (Zi Nian) in the Tongzhi period printed a rubbing map of power and money in his "Guan Gu Ge Spring Theory", and there was also a saying of "power and money". In 1940, Ding Fubao's "Dictionary of Ancient Coins" also contained relevant descriptions and rubbings, all of which were considered to be rare treasures in the world (the original coins contained in the book were missing). >>>More
The only children of Qin Shi Huang who can be seen in the history books are the eldest son Fusu, and the younger son Hu Hai, Gongzi Gao, and Gongzi Jianglu are four. There are history books that say that Qin Shi Huang had 12 sons, and there are records in the history books that Qin Shi Huang's 10th daughter was killed, so it seems that Qin Shi Huang had at least twenty or thirty children. According to expert research, Qin Shi Huang had a total of 33 children. >>>More
No, even if you know the right range, Google now only has satellite ideas for some of the more well-known places**. Therefore, Xi'an, Lishan, and Qin Shi Huang's curtain are not visible, and what is seen is also blurred.
Ancient horses are like modern cars and tanks. In the era of cold weapons, only excellent war horses can wear heavy armor with knights, strong defense and attack power, and the role of today's tanks is equivalent. Secondly, the ancient Maxima is equivalent to the current high-end sports car, who doesn't like luxury cars?!