Ask a question of law. Professional lawyers .

1. If you file a civil lawsuit for infringing on the reputation rights of others, you may be ordered to apologize and be sentenced to a certain amount of moral damages depending on the severity of the circumstances. However, your circumstances did not cause substantial moral damage, so you do not need to compensate for moral damages.

But the premise of the lawsuit is that the plaintiff knows your real identity and address, and if you only have one screen name, the plaintiff can't find you.

The bar exercises the right of management, and its code of conduct is measured according to the "User Notice", and your behavior has violated the rules of the bar, so although it does not constitute legal responsibility, it still has to be subject to some penalties from the bar.

2. Any netizen has the right to report and expose bad behavior. It's a bit of both.

3. If civil liability is constituted, the minor is also responsible, but some property liability is borne by his parents. Determining whether you constitute civil liability is up to the court, as mentioned above, because your identity information is difficult to verify, and the probability of all civil lawsuits being filed is very small.

4. It is a basic requirement not to infringe on the reputation of others when making mischief, and not to slander and slander others. I hope to strengthen the construction of my own moral quality. Communicate well about something, and don't attack others at will.

Hehe, there are such cases!

1.Your responsibility is not to mess around in the future, if the administrator thinks you have violated the rules, they will close your question, and if you violate the rules severely, you may have your ID banned.

2.Not necessarily, anyone can complain about you, as long as you are here (knowing) that you have done something that violates the rules.

Hello, there is no geographical limit, it is unified across the country, and it will not be leaked, only special departments and public security organs will look at it in the face of special circumstances, but it will not be leaked if it is not a special case (special circumstances refer to major cases involving important cases).

Legal basis: In the "Procedures for Juvenile Delinquency Cases", it is stipulated that "where a person was under the age of 18 at the time of committing the crime and was sentenced to a sentence of up to five years imprisonment, the judicial organs and relevant departments shall seal the relevant criminal records." ”

Where criminal records have been sealed, they must not be provided to any unit or individual, except where judicial organs are needed to handle the case or where relevant units conduct inquiries in accordance with laws and regulations. Units conducting inquiries in accordance with law shall keep confidential the circumstances of the sealed criminal records. ”

According to the joint document issued by the six departments, juvenile offenders are sentenced to less than 5 years, and criminal files will be strictly sealed. Public security organs, people's procuratorates, people's courts, and judicial-administrative organs shall establish effective systems for the management of juvenile criminal case archives, and strictly keep the files of juvenile offenders confidential. Where a person is sentenced to up to 5 years imprisonment, the public security organs, people's procuratorates, people's courts, and judicial-administrative organs shall seal the criminal record, and must not provide it to any organ, unit, or individual unless there is a legally-prescribed reason, and must not disclose the juvenile's administrative punishment record and the record of being criminally filed, employing criminal compulsory measures, not prosecuting, or being sentenced to a criminal punishment for a minor crime.

Therefore, the case record of a juvenile offender who has committed a crime for less than 5 years will be sealed, that is, the case record will not be leaked. For general work, it will not be affected (except for applying for positions such as civil servants).

It should be implemented as soon as the document is issued, and if the past case record has not been disclosed, it should also be sealed. The document is valid nationwide, and there are no geographical restrictions on sealing.

Question one, that's pretty much what you think it is. In the past, we had to report the case records to the community and work units, but now we protect minors who have committed minor crimes.

Question 2: In the amendment to the new Criminal Procedure Law, the system was implemented on January 1, 2013, so the system has not yet been implemented. In addition, no judicial interpretation has yet been issued on these new systems, so the specific application method is also unclear. However, in line with the principle of leniency in the old criminal law and the way in which juveniles were protected in the past, as long as it is a juvenile crime and meets the requirements of the new law, the leniency clause of the new law should be applied.

Therefore, 10 years of records should be sealed.

"Death due to an accident" is no longer just a civil legal relationship, so it can be reported to the Public Security Bureau, which will decide whether to file a case for investigation, and if not, it can also file a complaint with the procuratorate.

According to the specific analysis of the crime, there may be the following situations.

1. The crime of major liability accidents in educational facilities.

2. The crime of dereliction of duty.

3. Intentional injury.

4. The crime of negligence causing death.

The first two types of responsible persons are administrative personnel in the school, such as the principal, etc.; The latter two include staff such as administrators and teachers.

Your sister's guardian is your parent, and you have no guardianship duties, so you cannot sue the court.

If you meet the conditions to prosecute, you can only prosecute the civil part, and if the civil department does not constitute a crime, there is no crime.

Excuse me, are you an adult?

In terms of the information you provide, the case may involve the following provisions of the Criminal Code:

1.Article 134 Where an employee of a factory, mine, forestry farm, construction enterprise, or other enterprise or public institution fails to accept management, violates rules and regulations, or compels workers to work in violation of rules and regulations, resulting in a major accident or other serious consequences, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or short-term detention; where the circumstances are especially heinous, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given.

2.Article 135 Where the labor safety facilities of a factory, mine, forestry farm, construction enterprise or other enterprise or public institution do not comply with the provisions of the State, and no measures are taken against the potential danger of the accident after being raised by the employees of the relevant department or unit, and a major accident occurs or other serious consequences are caused, the person directly responsible shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention; where the circumstances are especially heinous, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given.

The key is what kind of accident Ling Mei died in, if the school (which belongs to a public institution) has major faults, such as safety facilities that do not meet the regulations. The school needs to bear criminal liability, and criminal liability must not be "private".

In this regard, if you are a minor, then you can ask other guardians, such as grandparents, to report to the public security organs on your behalf, if the public security organs do not file a case, you can apply to the procuratorate to urge the public security organs to file a case, or if the public security organs and the procuratorate do not file a case, you can file a lawsuit with the court on your own.

If you are an adult, you can exercise these rights on your own.

Hope that helps!

It depends on what the accident is. Is the principal directly responsible? If you are responsible, you should report the case to the local police station.

Whether it constitutes a crime or not is not necessarily.

It is possible to prosecute.

1. According to the provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, a person who clearly knows that another person is a drug addict and still allows others to take drugs constitutes the crime of accommodating others to take drugs.

2. According to the above relevant laws, if your friend clearly knows that the customer is a drug addict, it constitutes the crime of allowing others to take drugs, and if you do not know, then it does not constitute a crime.

Hope it helps.

I agree with his statement, I am a lawyer, I hi you, I am happy to serve you.

1.Does this count as a work injury?

It is an employment relationship, and a contract is required to apply for a work-related injury, etc., and generally cannot be recognized as a work-related injury.

2.Xiao Li, as the driver who caused the accident, and other police officers who determined the responsibility and assumed the liability for compensation according to the responsibility, 3If you want to compensate Xiao Li, how much is appropriate? Does Zhang San need compensation?

Need for compensation Please refer to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases.

Article 17: Where a victim suffers a personal injury, the person obligated to compensate for all expenses incurred for medical treatment, as well as the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, lodging expenses, hospital meal allowances, and necessary nutrition expenses.

If the victim is disabled due to injury, the compensation obligor shall also compensate for the necessary expenses incurred by the victim due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income caused by the loss of the ability to work, including disability compensation, disability assistive device expenses, and living expenses for dependents, as well as the necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

The employer, Zhang San, was not liable for the traffic accident, but did not sign a contract with Xiaoli, and Xiaoli could claim double wages in accordance with the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China.

1. Count as work-related injuries. It doesn't matter if there is a contract or not.

2. Xiao Li bears the liability for compensation for traffic accidents. Zhang San is liable for work-related injury compensation.

3. The specific amount of compensation depends on the actual occurrence of various expenses such as actual loss, disability, lost work, nutrition, medical treatment, etc., and cannot be simply said verbally.

1.Injury.

2. The driver is fully responsible.

3.Work injuries should be accompanied.

The driver is also required to compensate.

This question is answered in two ways.

First of all, if Xiaoli does not have a labor contract with Zhang San, and there is no actual work certificate, then Zhang San's responsibility (that is, the work-related injury) cannot be investigated.

Secondly, if Xiao Li has no obvious violation on the highway, the medical expenses, lost work expenses, and nutritional subsidies for her injuries should be compensated by Xiao Li's car insurance, and the rest (not a claim item of the insurance company) should be compensated by Xiao Li.

Work-related injury insurance system: The employer pays the work-related injury insurance premium, and the employee does not pay. On the way to work, if an employee falls under Article 14 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance, "if an employee has any of the following circumstances, it shall be deemed to be a work-related injury:

6) On the way to and from work, only when you are injured in a traffic accident or an accident in urban rail transit, passenger ferry, or train for which you are not primarily responsible, can it be recognized as a work-related injury. Here, if the driver runs a red light, the employee is not primarily responsible and should be recognized as a work-related injury. Therefore, you can judge by yourself according to the above provisions, and the key is to retain the evidence and apply to the social insurance administrative department for recognition in a timely manner within one year.

Yes, because this is within the scope of work-related injury determination.

The driver is fully responsible, but it does not mean that the boss is fine.

Who is paying?

But a de facto labor relationship has been formed, which is recognized by the labor law).

It's off work, it's definitely not counting! Accidental injuries are pretty much the same.

Article 52 of the Contract Law shall be invalid under any of the following circumstances:

1) One party concludes a contract by means of fraud or coercion, harming the interests of the state;

2) Malicious collusion, harming the interests of the state, the collective, or a third party;

3) Concealing illegal purposes in a lawful form;

4) Harming the public interest;

5) Violating mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations.

Article 53 The following exemption clauses in the contract are invalid:

1) Causing personal injury to the other party;

2) Intentionally or grossly negligently causing damage to the other party's property.

Article 54 One of the parties has the right to request the people's court or arbitration institution to modify or revoke the following contracts:

1) It was concluded due to a major misunderstanding;

2) It is obviously unfair at the time of the conclusion of the contract.

If one party uses fraud, coercion or taking advantage of the danger of others to cause the other party to enter into a contract contrary to its true intentions, the injured party has the right to request the people's court or arbitration institution to modify or revoke it.

Where a party requests a modification, the people's court or arbitration institution must not revoke it.

As long as it is not signed under duress, it is valid.