Whether the administrative lawsuit filed against the Wujiang Marriage and Relocation Management Meas

You can move your wife's hukou into the collective hukou of the Suzhou unit.

The relevant provisions in the Wujiang Municipal Measures for the Administration of Household Registration and Access refer to the fact that only those who have a job in Wujiang can move in the household registration, which is very similar to the household registration management measures in Beijing and Shanghai.

It's almost too likely to win! Because the rules of the game are not interpreted by the complaining party.

It depends on whether you have the evidence to overturn the effective judgment.

You can apply for an administrative review or file an administrative lawsuit in court.

This is not right, you can ask him for the relevant receipts as evidence, or you can ask them to show the legal basis for fees and fines?

Because your mother was born to you, they will make a fuss about your hukou, I don't know if you have a hukou now?

There is no legal basis for such fines.

Go to get a marriage certificate, then go to get a divorce certificate, and then move out of the other party or your own household registration, and then go to change the household registration book, so that it will not show that you are married.

Administrative litigation is useless, it may have been determined that you were a de facto marriage, and the place was registered as a married person when registering your household registration.

You can report to the higher department or file an administrative lawsuit with the civil affairs department as the defendant!

After 94 years, the marriage law no longer recognizes de facto marriages, and you are in a common-law relationship, so there is no divorce at all.

It is recommended to report the problem to the public security bureau at a higher level, and if it is not resolved, file an administrative lawsuit to correct the mistake.

And, of course, what was the status of registration at the time of the census?

Article 37 of the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the plaintiff may provide evidence to prove that the administrative act is illegal. Where the evidence provided by the plaintiff is not sustained, the defendant is not exempted from the burden of proof.

Article 38 stipulates that in a case where the defendant is sued for non-performance of statutory duties, the plaintiff shall provide evidence of his application to the defendant. However, there are any of the following circumstances:

The defendant shall take the initiative to perform legally-prescribed duties in accordance with their authority;

The plaintiff is unable to provide evidence for legitimate reasons.

In cases of administrative compensation or compensation, the plaintiff shall provide evidence of the damage caused by the administrative act. Where the plaintiff is unable to present evidence due to reasons attributable to the defendant, the defendant bears the burden of proof.

Article 34 stipulates that the defendant bears the burden of proof for the administrative act taken, and shall provide evidence of the administrative act and the normative documents on which it is based.

Where the defendant does not provide evidence or fails to provide evidence within the time limit without a legitimate reason, it is deemed that there is no corresponding evidence. However, the administrative act being sued involves the lawful rights and interests of a third party, except where the third party provides evidence.

I read your published letter. It is necessary to compensate Yang Jin first; Or do you have to complain about the inaction of the public security department first? These are two different legal issues.

Yang Jin's legal ** person should take the beater Li Jun as the defendant and file a lawsuit with the court to demand civil compensation.

Report to the local public security organ, let the procuratorate intervene, prosecute Li Jun, and conduct criminal proceedings.

During this court debate, do not get involved in the inaction of the public security department.

After dealing with Li Jun's problem, you are still not satisfied with the public security department. An administrative reconsideration may be filed separately. Go to the Datong Municipal Public Security Bureau for administrative reconsideration.

If you are still not satisfied with the administrative reconsideration of the Datong Municipal Public Security Bureau, you may file an administrative lawsuit in the Datong Municipal Court.