Ask us a legal question and ask a legal professional to answer these two questions

Updated on society 2024-02-08
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    China's "People's Bank of China Law" stipulates that the institution that confirms the authenticity of the renminbi is the bank, and the confiscation of counterfeit currency belongs to the bank, and the public security department or any other unit or individual has no right to confiscate it, but the commercial service departments have the obligation to assist the bank in discovering and confiscating the counterfeit currency. That is to say, if the general public or the financial and accounting personnel of the unit find "counterfeit money" (actually suspicious money) when receiving and paying cash, they should first detain the "fake money" and then send it to the bank for identification in time.

    At the same time, it is also stipulated that the collection department shall issue a voucher to the consumer when collecting the "counterfeit money", and the voucher shall indicate the face value and number of the suspicious banknote and the name of the banking institution that intends to hand over the banknote, so that the consumer can go to the relevant bank with the receipt for inquiry in the future. Since the bank has registered the "counterfeit money" it has collected, if it is confirmed to be counterfeit money after inspection, the bank should stamp the counterfeit money with the stamp of "counterfeit money" and issue a "counterfeit money confiscation form"; If the confiscated "counterfeit money" is found to be genuine, the bank shall return it to the payer or consumer, that is, the consumer can collect the confiscated "counterfeit money" from the payer or the handing over bank indicated in the receipt with the collection receipt.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Yes, with the exception of banks set up by state financial institutions, ordinary people cannot determine whether it is counterfeit or not, and they have no right to withhold it.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    There is no right to confiscate counterfeit money from grocery stores.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Of course, he does not have this right, he does not have the right to identify and confiscate.

    The state has special laws and regulations on the management of the confiscation of counterfeit money.

    The notice was just a scare.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Confiscation of counterfeit currency is only possible by financial institutions handling deposit and withdrawal business by the People's Bank of China, and no other department has the right to confiscate counterfeit money. Once a grocery store or supermarket or other business place receives counterfeit money, it should be handed over to the People's Bank of China public security organ and the financial institution handling the deposit and withdrawal business in a timely manner.

    Article 43 of the People's Bank of China Law stipulates that (purchase of counterfeit or altered renminbi or possession of renminbi knowingly counterfeit or altered. Use. where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law; where a crime is not constituted, the public security organs are to detain them for up to 15 days and impose a fine of up to 10,000 yuan. )

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Case 1, you are not legally liable because you have made an obligation to inform in advance. Insider hazards are clearly stated, so please do not break in.

    Case 2: If this fact is captured in the surveillance video of your car, it can be used as evidence for the defense of innocence. If the old man uses violence and intimidation to make you lose money, and there is evidence to prove it, can your surveillance video still be recorded?

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    First, there is no problem in terms of the specific situation. There is no legal liability.

    The second, which is innocent in the first place, is only a certain civil liability even if it is really touched. Hitting people on the highway is even less problematic. The other party can be guilty of fraud.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    In Case 1, you are justified in self-defense and do not need to be held legally responsible.

    In case 2, if you can provide the video, you can prove your innocence, or you can countersue the old man.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    In favor of the above. It will not affect the child's college attendance. However, if there is a position that needs to be reviewed in the future, it will be a stain.

    It's hard to say to what extent it can be changed.

    There may still be a penalty, but how to punish ......You can find someone to help you or something, it's not a hard measure.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    May I ask what you should have to bear, why should your brother bear it??? He's going to change it to your name, and your ID card, which should have been yours. Why wouldn't you???

Related questions