Help translate the following into English Good bonus for that

You can post this on the school forum, where many classmates will help you translate.

Or you can check it out on the Rayin Walker website.

If b is used, the present perfect tense means that he is still living in New York, but the title means that he is now in Anhui, so he can only use the past tense to indicate that he has lived in New York for ten years. It seems that you don't have a good grasp of the past completion.

Choose A, because I am now at Anhui University, not in New York, so in New York is just a pure description of the past, so use the past tense.

Isn't My Uncle in Anhui now? Living in New York is a thing of the past, and the most important thing is to look at the context.

The present perfect tense refers to the effect that an action that has been completed relative to the present is the effect on the present. In this sentence, I just state the fact that my uncle used to live in New York, and emphasize the fact that my uncle is now teaching at Anhui University. So it is better to choose the simple past tense.

The for+ time period is generally paired with completion, but is not required. It doesn't necessarily have to be done when you have it.

Choose A, the meaning of the sentence is that my uncle is now teaching English at Anhui University, and he used to live in New York for more than ten years, which means that my uncle has returned from New York, which is a thing of the past

Choose A, this second half of the sentence is just a description of the uncle, so use the simple past tense.

The main clause is in the present tense, now in Anhui University, and the clause is in the United States before it, which is the past tense.

"for+ for a while" is a sign of the present perfect tense, but it has to be in the middle of the main clause.

For example, in the previous sentence, the comma is preceded by the main clause, and the comma is followed by the modification of "my uncle". For more than 10 years in the question is to confuse you.

Therefore, the auxiliary verb has to be omitted.

The answer is a

Choose a because the following sentence indicates a general state of the past.

b, because according to the meaning, my uncle now teaches English at Anhui University, and he lived in New York for more than 10 years before that. The 10 years are until the time of his return to China, so the emphasis is on the past He lived in New York, so the past perfect tense should be used, so B is chosen

If it wasn't had lived, then only live should be chosen, emphasizing the past state, and living in the past 10 years, this question can't be used has lived because has lived emphasizes that he has lived for 10 years now, obviously he is now in China, it can't be until now, so it is impossible to use has lived

The answer is b.

for more than 10 years.Instructions should be used in the time of completion.

He taught at Anhui University and lived in New York for more than 10 years. It shows that I have not lived until now, but I have lived for more than 10 years in the past.

So use the past perfect tense. Pick B.

A, of course. Judging from the context, the following clause refers to the fact that he has lived in New York for more than 10 years, indicating the state of the past, while the previous clause tells us that he does not live there now.

If it is in the present tense, it indicates that he has lived in New York from the past to the present, and in the present tense, it means that it has continued from the past to the present and is likely to continue.

Translation service integrity unit.

Top 10 Employers in China's Translation Industry.

ISO international quality system certification.

Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court entrusted a translation agency for foreign-related civil and commercial judicial documents.

A fixed translation service provider for many ** institutions, Fortune 500 companies and well-known industry leaders.