On legal issues, urgent! Legal questions, please help answer them!

The business license is only a change of legal representative, which is a change of the business license, but it does not affect the nature of the unit itself, and the original administrative penalty is still valid.

The punishment of the health department is for the unit corresponding to the business license, not for the individual, so the health department is in accordance with the law for the store to continue to pay the fine.

If the legitimate rights and interests of the successor are damaged due to the behavior of the original owner due to the change of business license, the successor has the right to recover from the original operator, which belongs to another civil legal relationship.

In layman's terms, the health department has the right to require your parents to pay the original fine, which is stipulated in the Food Safety Law, and your parents can recover the money from your brother-in-law after paying the fine, which belongs to the scope of civil law. Note that the change of business license does not affect the corresponding creditor's rights and debts and administrative penalties, and it is impossible to evade debts or penalties by changing the license.

1. It is speculated that in this case, the administrative penalty is mainly aimed at the store.

2. The store is still there, although the person in charge has been changed, but only the business license has been changed, and the responsible subject has not changed.

Therefore, there may be the following legal risks:

1. The business license has been revoked.

2. Compulsory enforcement by the people's court.

3. Be included in the integrity blacklist.

Is it legal for your brother-in-law to be punished for food safety problems, refusing to pay the fine, and transferring the store to others to evade responsibility?

You don't even need to ask this question! Think about it: if you can escape punishment by changing the legal person, then you can change the legal person if you are punished again in the future.

Besides, let alone changing the legal person, even if it is sold, as long as the penalty clause is not reflected in the agreement, the sale will still be investigated.

I think it's legal, because no matter whose name the store is, there is a problem with the non-payment of fines, and the penalty will not be erased just because of the name change.

It's legal, the main thing is to punish this store, no matter who the owner changes.

Although the name has been changed to your parents, the name of the store still exists, and the name of the store belongs to the business entity that bears the qualification independently. So you have the right to ask your parents to pay a fine.

Legal, because you have to ask for a fine if you don't pay it.

Hello, you need to pay a fine, because the fine is linked to the business license, and now the license has changed, and the responsible person is your parents.

Say, because they are a family.

Legal, otherwise how can that account be calculated?

I asked, I asked, as long as you give me money.

What exactly are the questions you are talking about, you can ask for money

Your age is not an offence and does not raise the question of compensation. If the woman gives birth to a child, both have the obligation to support her. But morally speaking, the man should accompany the woman to kill the child, after all, he is still young, give a certain amount of nutrition, and more importantly, psychological comfort.

I think you can communicate with her parents, and you don't have to go to court!

The law is settled according to the civil principle The woman has lived in the south without her parents It has been proved that the woman has taken the initiative and the man has not been actively at fault unless the woman is under the age of 18.

Hello, first of all, the marriage is completely voluntary, so there is no question of damages. The marriage is null and void because the parties have not reached the legal age for marriage.

Secondly, if there is a damage result, the right to claim lies with the woman, and the family has no right to claim compensation. Because the woman has reached the age of 18 and is a person with full capacity for civil conduct.

You need to prove that the woman and the man are completely consensual and that they were at least 18 years old at the time of pregnancy. will not suffer.

The courts will generally settle the dispute as a family dispute.

If the woman is over 18 years old or has reached the age of 16 but is under the age of 18, but her main livelihood is based on her own labor income, the woman is already a person with full capacity for civil conduct and is an independent civil subject. Her parents do not have the right to take the man to court because of the woman's marital or love problems.

The legal principle is very simple, there is no situation to compensate, but logically you are not very advantageous, and the in-laws will give some money if they want it, but they have no reason to sue in terms of litigation.

There are also married men 22 and women 20 They are not old enough, so get the certificate as soon as you reach the age.

The two parties have not yet reached the legal age of marriage, and they live together without a marriage certificate, which is still not recognized in the law of our country, so this marriage is invalid, but the woman is pregnant, and she needs to pay child support, which you jointly own.

But from a personal point of view, I think that if both parties really love each other, or if there is really a relationship, I hope that parents can give the boy a chance to take the man to court, not only for the man personally, but also for your daughter to be hurt, and the child will be innocently implicated, I hope that parents can think more about their daughter's future, and do not seek temporary responsibility, destroying their daughter's bright future and her happy life.

Hello, the first question, 100 yuan is the proceeds of robbery, before the payment is made to the store, the criminal proceeds should be returned to the victim, so the police should confiscate his 100 yuan, and the loss of the store should be claimed to the criminal. The second question is that if the money has been paid to the store and the money has been transferred to the store for possession, the police cannot recover it, but the offender can only return the remaining dirt to the victim, and the offender will compensate for the shortfall.

On the contrary, Foxconn is a very formal factory and fulfills all Chinese laws very well.

They have two days off and overtime pay

Mainly Foxconn Apple They are large enterprises, and in general, small enterprises, some add to the salary.

1.The law is the last line of defense for social morality. Unless this worst-case scenario is undertaken, there will be no legal action.

2.Ozawa's performance in China is a commercial activity, and as long as he does not perform pornographic content, it is legal.

3.This phenomenon should not be regulated by law, but by the relevant administrative authorities. It is a more effective way to use the slogan of rectifying vulgarity to restrain the current chaotic entertainment industry.

A while ago, there was a program that invited Sister Cang to perform in China, which can only be said to be a manifestation of vulgarity and vulgarity, catering to low-level groups. After that, ** issued an internal document requiring the regulation of entertainment programs.

4.In today's commercial society, morality has long been forgotten. Between interests and morality, some ** still choose interests. Forget about their social functions and responsibilities. It's a cup.