It turns out that the world s armaments combined are inferior to those of the United States

It is difficult for the United States to win, because Russia's military development technology is comparable to that of the United States, but because the collapse of the Soviet Union is a bit tight economically, there is no development after the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, if the whole world is united, then the countries will complement each other technologically and economically, and the United States will definitely surpass the United States in technology. Moreover, even if China's ballistic missile development technology is not much worse than that of the United States, it will only be two or three years.

Moreover, war is not only about strength but also about economy, and the best fighter aircraft (not necessarily the best, maybe the best fighter may not be taken out) made public by the United States is F2.2 billion US dollars, and the best bomber B2 is not supported by 2 billion US dollars. There are also large-scale wars, oil and steel are not yet to be imported, and if there is no world market, it is estimated that it will be difficult for the United States to obtain abundant steel supplies.

The technical blockade and economic sanctions are estimated to be over in less than a week.

Even if the United States is so powerful now, even if it fights a small war with Russia, it may not be as good as China.

The number of armaments in the world will definitely surpass that of the United States, but there are many things that only the United States has, and other countries do not have, so it is really difficult to compare.

In the case of not using nuclear **, let alone one United States, two United States may not win, fighting with the whole world is to fight a war of attrition, not a few days, months can be defeated, a long time to fight, can the United States eat it, don't you see that small countries like Iraq and Afghanistan have not yet done it.

If it is attacked with nuclear **, the whole world will be finished, and now the United States, China and Russia have so many nuclear **, and they will be built in large quantities when they are fought.

Hit the whole world!!

There are 200 million Chinese regular troops alone, and imagine that there are 200 to 300 million people in the whole of the United States. Not to mention the whole world.

..The United States and the whole world are fighting The United States will lose...

It's certainly not the United States, and the tigers are hard to beat.

An army is very strong, mainly because it has reliable backers, such as the United States, its economic development level is very advanced, and some of their country's high-tech **ah, are ahead of the world.

The most important prerequisite is to have sufficient funds, and the root of all this is the two world wars, because of the geographical location, which brought huge war wealth to the United States.

Because the United States is one of the most developed countries in the world and is well equipped, their army is also very strong.

There is money, there is a battlefield, a strong national strength, and very unique geographical conditions, there is no strong country around, so you can save a lot of defensive energy, and you can attack from all sides and enhance your influence.

How did the U.S. military manage to blow up the Iranian general with only 3 rockets of this type?

Finally, the Americans claim to be the world's policeman, and since they are the world's policeman, they must exercise their hegemony all over the world, otherwise how can they be called the world's policeman? In their propaganda to themselves, Americans often claim to be the world's policeman. Since it is the world's police, then it is certain that there must be military bases where its troops are stationed all over the world.

Otherwise, how can we implement the strategy of global hegemony, otherwise how can we ensure our own interests? Therefore, the US military presence abroad is the skeleton that supports US hegemony in the world.

US hegemonism has always been widely criticized by the people of all countries in the world, and now the trend of globalization is becoming more and more obvious, and no country can dominate the whole world on its own, and the United States is no exception. If he cannot let down his guard and aggressiveness, sooner or later the United States will be defeated by other allied countries, and peace in the world today is the common expectation of the people and the theme of the development of the entire human race.

The United States has troops stationed in many parts of the world, such as Japan and South Korea in East Asia, Iraq in the Middle East, and Germany in Europe.

These overseas US troops have become the main force for the United States to achieve world hegemony, so there is a saying that "the US overseas troops stationed abroad are the skeleton that supports US hegemony."

The analysis of international relations should be carried lightly, and should not always be too heavy.

Fearing that it would be stolen and robbed, a factory found a security company and paid them to send someone to guard it.

What's wrong with that?

International relations and interpersonal relations are similar.

Theoretically speaking, in the eyes of many countries, looking for a U.S. military presence is actually the same as finding a security company.

As long as this security company doesn't violate the policies of this factory, doesn't mess around, gives them a few offices and guard rooms, and spends some money to hire them, it's normal.

This is because the United States has troops stationed overseas on major roads throughout China, and it can be said that it has troops stationed at all nodes in the world, and it can rush to all parts of the world as quickly as possible, and it can also claim hegemony and control strategic points in the local area.

This is because to this day, the United States has 374 overseas military bases distributed in more than 140 countries and regions, mainly in the Middle East, Europe, Japan, South Korea, the Pacific and other regions, and the total number of troops stationed overseas exceeds 300,000, accounting for 1.5 percent of the total number of troops. It can also be seen from the data that even though the US military bases abroad are constantly being reduced, they are still distributed in all corners of the world, and its emergency response and strike capabilities are still able to cover the whole world. This is the hard foundation of US hegemony, and without the support of these overseas troops, the United States cannot become a great power that influences the whole world, at most it is only a regional power in the Americas.

I think the U.S. relies on these overseas troops to deploy troops quickly and prepare for possible enemies, to deter and deter outsiders.

The United States is stationing troops in various countries, and the United States will actually save a lot of money, and these countries will give the United States military spending, after all, the United States is going to protect him, and you must be filial to the United States in terms of military spending.