How about the fire thief, how about the right hand and left hand

"The Universe in the Shell" is also Hawking's; "What is Life" by Schrödinger; "From One to Infinity" Gamorey's ......There are too many, and any one of them is a classic.

A Brief History of Time.

Second Nature: The Mystery of Consciousness.

The Fire Stealer.

A Brief History of Everything. Hidden Reality: What a Parallel Universe Is.

A book of mathematical magic for all mankind.

BBC Science Trilogy – Earth, Life, Oceans.

The art of nature.

From One to Infinity - Facts and Conjectures in Science.

A new perspective on the universe.

Visual Journey: Magical Chemical Elements.

Global Science has a set of first scientific vision book series, which is quite good.

About quantum mechanics – does God roll the dice.

I don't read much, but I like these two very much.

I'm also a freshman in high school, and I'm watching the Divine Comedy (Dante), and I feel like it's full of Renaissance feeling, which is very good, and it is recommended to buy one with a picture, which will scare me.

I recommend a book separately, "The Book of Fu Lei's Family".

The Fire Stealer Translation Series, the first push series.

It's good to read more, I read a brief history of time 3 times, and I can only understand 2 percent of the first time.

You can read more other books to supplement, such as "The First Promotion Series", and "Fire Stealer Translation Series" by Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House.

In addition, the reason why you can't understand it is on two points. Quantum theory and relativity, the theory of relativity is really difficult, I read Einstein's "A Brief Introduction to Special and General Relativity" and I still don't understand anything. In terms of quantum theory, I highly recommend the book "History of Quantum Physics", which basically does not require you to have any foundation, is easy to understand and rigorous.

Figure below. <>

I'm in my third year of junior high school this year, and I've also read A Brief History of Time. In my opinion, the so-called confusing things in it are limited to the names of those particles, and some of the theories in it are still relatively acceptable, and you can understand them by calming down and looking at them slowly.

Don't wait until college.

Because even if you go to college, you won't necessarily be able to see it through. That book is mainly an introduction rather than an explanation, and it belongs to the popular science book.

I like this set of books translated by the fire thief very much, and when I saw this book in the Zhongguancun Book Building, I couldn't bear to leave while standing by the bookshelf, and it took me one night to read it. The questions discussed in this book remind me of this part of the physics teacher.

I like this set of books translated by the fire thief very much, and when I saw this book in the Zhongguancun Book Building, I couldn't bear to leave while standing next to the bookshelf, and Hua Na laughed and finished reading it all night. The questions discussed in this book make me wonder where to go to this section where there is a lack of physics teachers.

It's not that I have to apply the principles of Marxism, but I have to admit that there are no absolutes in things!

Can you admit it? If you can accept my point of view, it will be easy to understand later!

There is no absolute accident, which means that there is a certain inevitability.

It should be agreed that civilization and progress are contingent, for example, who was the first monkey to walk upright? Why did he come down from the tree, and why did he walk upright? The reasons for this period are complex, and it is impossible to say which link is inevitable, so this can be classified as accidental.

However, since one monkey walked upright, the second monkey, or because of the influence of this monkey, walked upright, and there was some inevitability. Why? Regardless of whether the second monkey is better for survival because the first monkey walks upright on the ground or not, it is certain that he has received the influence of a factor that has already been formed, even if this factor is formed by chance, but for the second monkey, it is a necessity!

Got it? Whether it is civilization or progress, it is a continuous state that cannot be separated.

It is not denied that it started by chance, but it must not be assumed that it was all accidental just because it started by chance! Because for monkeys, civilization is not only about walking upright on the ground, but also about walking upright on the ground, but also about using flint, eating cooked food, and starting to have a marriage system, and so on!

So, you are right when you say that the progress of civilization is accidental, to give a very simple example, which monkey accidentally ate an animal that was burned by fire, and then thought that cooked food was more delicious, and then began to eat cooked food? We certainly don't know this, but it's certain that the monkey starts eating cooked food and plays a very important role in the development of his intelligence, because one of the differences between humans and animals is that humans can make tools, which requires intelligence. However, after the first monkey ate cooked food, and later began to eat only cooked food, and gave up the eating habit of drinking blood, the intelligence of the whole group began to be greatly improved, and then more tools were created, which promoted the great progress of society, which is inevitable!

I think it's very commendable that you can think that way.

Because there are very few people who think for themselves now.

I recommend you watch The Fire Stealer.

What people can realize and control is called necessity, and what cannot be realized or controlled is called accident. Necessity and chance are only one of the many criteria by which man distinguishes things.