Why do well off families not have a second child, and the grassroots are eager to have a third c

Why do "well-off" families not have a second child, and the "grassroots" are eager to have a third child?

Because the thinking of the poor and the rich is different, the poor think that more than one child will have more than one pair of chopsticks such a simple thing, teaching not to educate is not too important, raising one more person to raise themselves and help themselves make money, while the idea of the rich is to focus on the cost of children's education and training, and the children will have to study in the future to study for the big economic expenses! Therefore, from this aspect, there is an essential difference between "well-off" and "grassroots"!

The most direct reason for many grassroots two-child families is that if the only child continues from generation to generation, once the parents die, the only child will have no relatives.

Parents are worried that they are living alone in this world, with no place to complain about their sufferings and no one to share their joys. Therefore, I hope to have more children, so that the children can grow up together, share weal and woe, and live forever. Even if their parents leave this world, children can still stay hand in hand and never be alone.

Moderately prosperous families do not have a second child, because they are afraid of a decline in the quality of life, after all, having one more child will increase the family's economic expenses, and the parents' time and energy will also be consumed. Moderately prosperous families prefer to enjoy parenting life, self-leisure and entertainment life and career work at the same time.

Having a second child at the grassroots level may be financially stressful, but I want to let the child have one more brother and sister, one more companion, or one more baby of oneself and a little more happiness, and the family will be more lively.

The idea of a well-off family is not to rely on children to provide for the elderly, and parents in wealthy families do not expect their children to provide for their own pension, but rely on their own hard work. And grassroots families are counting on having more children so that they can live a better life in their later years, and they pin all their hopes on their children.

So that's why parents in families with average or better conditions tend to focus on their careers and are not interested in having a second child. And those grassroots families gave birth to a second child early, and even wanted to have a few more.

People are their own lives, and there are only children who live well and those who do not live well.

The concept of a well-off family is eugenics, while the grassroots family believes that the more children they have, the more wealth they can bring to the family.

Children from well-off families have a relatively higher standard of living and a lot of consumption, and feel that raising a child is too laborious, while grassroots children belong to that kind of free-range model, and they feel that raising a few are raised, and they also like to have more people.

Because well-off families pay more attention to their children's educational resources, children's growth environment and the living environment of couples. Moderately well-off families are willing to spend money on the quality of life for their children's education, so they think that one child is enough. Grassroots families are eager to have three children, except for the reason that they like children.

Another reason is that I want to have more children to prevent myself from being old and having no one to support in my old age.

Because well-off families will pay attention to the comprehensive development of children in all aspects, a child is already very tired, but"Grassroots"The family may be the traditional idea, the more children, the better, so they will fight for 3 children.

Well-off families don't have that time, they do big things, and children take more time, so they don't have a second child. Grassroots families, doing special unskilled work, hope that the family will be lively and lively, and they pay more attention to the quality of life.

1. There are many reasons not to have three children, one of which is that you may not be able to raise them. Nowadays, the cost of education and raising is very expensive, and if you want to raise a good child and cultivate a pillar of the country, it takes a lot of money, and the average family conditions are simply not able to support a third child.

2. The second of them is that no one has a child, two days ago I saw a **, the third child was crying, and the mother was holding and coaxing the child. The second and third are about the same size, and they are also shouting for their mother to hug them, but there is also a boss who asks his mother to accompany him to do his homework, and his mother is really more than enough to do her alone.

3. Other ......

Summary: Although there are many reasons not to have three children, but there are many reasons to have three children, many people are joking that having three children is for the future when they are critically ill, the eldest and the second child discuss whether to pull out the oxygen tube, the third child can make a decision as soon as possible, and to implement, although it is very funny, but it is also a fact, the three children have a discussion, can help each other.

In today's world where involution is so serious, making money is definitely not an easy task. Many people complain that "dads" have less time to take care of their children, but if "dads" have more spring tremors when they take care of their children, there will be less time to earn money.

The responsibilities of men and women in marriage are so clear, the woman is in charge of the family and can find time to work, and the man works wholeheartedly to earn money to support the family.

I believe that there will be many families who will usher in a third new life, but there will also be many families, choose one or two, it will vary from person to person.

For a long time, it has been relatively common for families not to pursue a third child. Generally speaking, families do not pursue three children because of several reasons such as Sun Diqin:

First of all, financial pressure is a big reason why families do not pursue a third child. At present, the per capita income of residents in China is already relatively high, but generally speaking, most families are still at the middle income level, which has a great impact on family finances. Therefore, having an extra child can put more pressure on the family's finances, so families often have concerns in this regard.

Secondly, from a development perspective, the consideration of carrying capacity and energy will also hinder families from pursuing a third child. The family's pursuit of a third child means that in order to provide a good environment for the development of children, the family has to bear a certain burden in terms of financial resources and energy, so the family is usually unwilling to face too many burdens.

In addition, families will also give up pursuing a third child for different reasons. Families may give up pursuing a third child due to social policies and other reasons, such as the policy that a third child will be punished in some places, which will affect the family's decision-making; For example, if there are already two children in the family, they may not pursue the third child because they feel that a family of three is lively enough.

Generally speaking, families will not pursue a third child because of financial pressure, carrying capacity and energy considerations, as well as social policies, which are all important aspects of family considerations.

The general family does not want to have three children, mainly for the following reasons.

The cost of having a child is too high. After giving birth to a child, you need to have someone to serve the child, and in fact, in the face of the two children who have not grown up before, the two of them are already tired of coping, and now they have to face the third one who is about to be born, which is really more than enough and not enough. How can another person's income not support the total expenses of the family?

Therefore, this reason is in the first place.

The idea of having children is reduced. With the increase of age, many couples are not willing to have so many envious children, too many children, which is tantamount to reducing the quality of life, more pressure has to be concentrated on one person, and then there are two parents who need to support, emotional pressure, and conflicts between husband and wife, which need to be dealt with, so the idea of childbearing will be reduced.

3.The problem of children's education also makes many people afraid to have three children. Parents in modern society attach great importance to the education of their children, if they give birth to a third child, then all the children's education problems will appear widowed education, are borne by one person, and the other person will be exhausted, so two people dare not have a third child, once born, his education is a big problem.

In short, from the cost of childbirth and the idea of childbirth, coupled with the pressure of education, people have some resistance to the idea of having three children, but those who have the ability can still give birth.

1. Families in difficulty: the total number is more important than the quality.

Poor families feel that each child is raising 2 and also has a belt, having more children is very beneficial to the elderly themselves, and the poor family has little investment in children's chemicals and education projects, and the clothes and pants worn by the eldest can be sent to Erbao to wear, most of them are to buy one thing, so that the children take turns to use it, so having more children is not too harmful to the usual expenses. In the countryside, there is a view that the children and grandchildren are full, and in their opinion, the more children and grandchildren there are, the more blessings they have, and they don't care about having one or two more children, and they feel that they can take care of each other when they are older.

2. Families in difficulty: satisfaction in third- and fourth-tier cities.

Compared with the pressure of life and work in first-tier cities, the third and fourth-tier cities will actually be much less, although the salary is slightly lower, but the cost of living is also relatively low, most of the people in the eighteenth-tier small counties have ordered social pension insurance in advance, so there are no worries about leaving at the regular age, you can enjoy the corresponding policy preferences, they can choose to have a second child, which is not too much for their work pressure, and the two children will make the family happier, which can increase a sense of satisfaction.

3. Middle-class families: work pressure in first-tier cities.

It is an invisible pressure for middle-class families, because most middle-class families living in big cities are facing great loan work pressure, temporary salary is enough to pay, rent, housing loans, car loans and other assets without more consumption, once a second child is born, not only to provide for the child's accommodation problem, but also to take into account the child's future education budget. The second-born child has undoubtedly become an obstacle in life, adding more difficulties to their close life.

4. Middle-class families: pay attention to project investment in children.

Middle-class families take into account the hot issues of children's education, because parents in big cities always want to give their children a good education, in addition to basic teaching on weekdays, they will also enroll their children in various training institutions in their free time, which is a huge expense. If you have a second child, you really can't concentrate network resources to cultivate an excellent child, if the two children don't have a good education, it is not as good as cultivating a child to relieve the pressure on your life.

5. Middle-class families: fast-paced life.

Middle-class families will also consider not having time and energy to take care of their children, and in the fast-paced city, office workers are always busy at work and rarely have the time and energy to take care of their families. They often find a nanny to take care of their children, or call their parents to help take care of them. The premise of having only one child is enough for them to be busy, not to mention after giving birth to a second child, so many middle-class people will fully consider how much confusion they will cause for themselves and their parents after having a second child.

Many people's parents are already old and do not have much energy to take care of their children, and if they all find nannies to take care of them, it can also add to their own financial situation and work pressure, so most middle-class people will give up their second child.

Because many low-income families, parents do not have career worries. Most of them are manual laborers, freelancers, and do not have regular jobs, and they work the same wherever they work. They are also not worried about the impact that pregnancy and childbirth will have on their careers.

Because middle-class families are more competitive and want to create better conditions for their children, they dare not have a second child, while grassroots families dare to fight for a third child because the state's support is relatively large, plus they have some traditional ideas.

Because middle-class families don't worry about money, having a child can train that child to become a top talent. Grassroots families have no money, so they can only change their own destiny by having three children, and having three children can provide for them in old age.

1.More and more young people in the city marry late and have children for various reasons, and they have already married and had children late, and they don't have the energy to have a third child.

2.Now that the marriage and divorce rate is so high, it is no longer the era when you have a child and you will live for a lifetime, the marriage is unstable, and no matter how many children you have, it is not responsible for the children.

3.Nowadays, most families are dual-income workers, it is difficult for ordinary families to have full-time mothers, fathers earn money to support the whole family, mothers need to have maternity leave after giving birth, to have lactation, but also to restore their figure, but also to avoid postpartum anxiety. Women have to take more than half a year off when they have a child in the workplace, and if they regenerate as soon as they recover, the workplace will not go smoothly and many opportunities will be missed.

4.Who will bring the children of dual-income families, either the elderly at home or ask for a nanny, the elderly can take one or two or couples take turns to pick up a child, if there is another child, the family is even more inseparable from people. As for the nanny, it will cost an extra money to bring an extra baby chain, and there is not necessarily only one nanny.

5.Housing is another problem after there are more children in the family, two children can live in one room for several years, three children live in one room is not enough, so can't you change to a big house?

6.The problem of children's education, which child in this society does not attend a few extracurricular classes, parents tutor their children's homework which is not to do their best, and how much more financial resources and energy is required for one more child.

7.And no matter how well a child is raised, the normal pre-call to eat, drink, and daily learning cannot be ignored, and almost 20 years of this life have to revolve around the child.

Children are indeed the future of society, and they can also bring a lot of joy to a family, but at the same time, it is undeniable that the current social pressure is not as good as in that era, and each family has its own measure on the topic of whether to have children or not.